I bought this book after hearing the author, Joel Skousen, on an episode of the "ReWild Yourself" podcast. At the time, my wife and I were living nomadically in a self-converted campervan, and were in the throes of trying to figure out a "safe" area of the country to purchase property in for the future. Hearing Skousen discuss all the things to think about when establishing a rural retreat was fairly eye-opening, so I ordered his book.
While the overall concept of the book is very useful - a guide to safe places broken down regionally and state-by-state - the book has several cringe-worthy flaws that ultimately make it useless for anything but a dejected laugh.
First of all, Skousen writes as if we're still in the Cold War. Nuclear war and proximity to nuclear targets has an outsize effect on his state ratings, whereas he completely ignores more contemporary (and serious/realistic) threats, like climate change.
On the subject of climate change, Skousen is a climate change denier. In the opening pages, he dismisses climate change as nothing more than a conspiracy. Well, I must say that finding somewhere "relatively safe" from the effects of climate change is the number one thing that I am worried about when searching for a place to establish a homestead. Skousen's complete denial of scientific facts deeply limits the utility of this book for those of us who want to make a future in reality.
What's more, Skousen is completely racist. He ranks states lower that have higher nonwhite populations. And in the demographic info he displays on each state, he only lists percentages of minorities (making it clear that his audience is white people who would want to know how many nonwhites are in an area before making a decision). Not only that, his information and interpretations of demographics are often inaccurate. For example, he dings New Mexico for having a large Hispanic population, and writes that the state has been overrun by Mexican immigrants. This is completely wrong. The Hispanic population in New Mexico by and large are descendants of Spanish settlers who came to the area in the 17th and 18th centuries. And in either case, what does this have to do with the suitability of an area or the resiliency of the population? Skousen's entire philosophy is based upon the superiority of white people, which, like so much of this book, is completely false.
I could go on, since there are many nonsensical things that he dings states for (having a higher percentage of Democrats, for one).
While I wanted to like this book, Skousen's blatant racism, climate change denial, and questionable interpretations make this book essentially useless for finding a rural retreat that will actually be safe (or at least safer) from the threats that we are facing in our uncertain future.