What a writer, my God! (Or 'what a writer, by Jove', if one wishes to sound more English). I read 'Homage to Catalonia' - in Italian translation - as a leftist, passionate, troubled teenager, and absolutely adored it. I moved on to 'Down and out in Paris and London' - again in Italian translation - during my University years, and also loved it with a passion. As the years went by, I discovered a few things about Orwell, which, mutually-contradictory as they may seem, actually bear witness to his unflinching moral stance. I must admit that this is, as I recall, my first Orwell in English. And Jesus, could the man write! Two main 'discoveries' were triggered by the book. First, how little the British society and education system have changed, despite the obvious, major external changes. Among the latter, for instance, the fact that, not only is it not allowed to hit a child now, and thank god for that, but things have gone so far that teachers, educators, sports trainers and the likes, have to be extremely careful as to any physical contact they may have with minors of age, as a potential lawsuit is always around the corner (hugs are also dangerous, in that typical,extreme Anglo-Saxon/British exaggeration and passion for political correctness which makes society an awkward, uncomfortable place). I may have to clarify that what I am writing applies to a specific part of the UK, Northern Ireland, where the typical British child abuse described by Orwell adds up to the horrific abuses perpetrated, in Ireland North and South, by the 'beloved' Catholic church. A society that has a guilty conscience must find ways to silence that conscience without actually looking in depth into its own distortions and their causes. Despite such major changes, as I mentioned, the class-structure that underpinned the British education system during Orwell's time is still very much in place, thanks to despicable things like the A-levels, which only serve to make sure that working-class kids do not go to grammar schools...or at least, to make it extremely difficult for them to get there. The second discovery is how similar, in many respects, Orwell's experiences in a prep school in the 1910s were to my own experiences - beginning in 1987! - in a so-called 'Liceo classico' in Italy (a sort of grammar school were pupils learn, or are expected to learn Latin AND Greek): a very similar class system, if based on slightly different values, a very similar cruelty, if not physical, and very similar effects on the pupil's mind- or at any rate, on my own. One passage will suffice to illustrate this: (On leaving the prep school): "...With a sense of coming out from darkness into sunlight. (...). It was not that I expected, or even intended, to be any more successful at a public school than I had been at St. Cyprian's. But still, I was escaping. I knew that at a public school there would be more privacy, more neglect, more chance to be idle and self-indulgent and degenerate. For years I had been resolved -unconsciously at first, but consciously later on - that once my scholarship was won I would 'slack off' and cram no longer. This resolve, by the way, was so fully carried out that between the ages of thirteen and twenty-two or three I hardly ever did a stroke of avoidable work". To say that this rings a bell would be an understatement. That 'sense of coming out of darkness into sunlight' and the notion that I had 'escaped', mirror exactly what I felt on finally leaving high school (the Liceo classico), aged 20. I was free from that toxic, insane atmosphere, and that was all that mattered, even if the future was uncertain. And the 'resolve' not to do a single 'stroke of avoidable work' ever again is the same that I formulated, 'unconsciously at first, but consciously later on' when finally, after three painful years, I moved on from the 'ginnasio' (the first, hard, two years of Liceo classico, in which one is supposed to learn the entire grammar of Latin and Greek- in my case these became three years, as I failed once and had to re-do a year) to the 'liceo' proper, the last three years, in which one could, to an extent, slack off and live off her previous work. Incidentally and to conclude, four years of postgraduate studies in a British University have persuaded me that the political-correctness that rules those institutions is pure fluff, meant to cover up the absurdity of that system and to silence its guilty conscience. Another very striking feature of that system, which makes it, in my experience, significantly worse than Italian University, is the total absence of criticism, self-criticism, ans self-analysis of its teaching staff. All they complain about is their salaries, but they manage to ignore completely their own complicity in maintaining that system and its disgusting little power games and power abuses. They manage to exclude from their intellectual and moral horizon the knowledge that power is not always 'elsewhere' (in the Government, for instance, which refuses to give them a salary raise): that power, in fact, is them, in many respects. British universities have a significantly greater amount of money than Italian universities, but, to anyone thinking of studying in one such institutions, I would remind a very nice line from Virgil: "timeo Danaos et dona ferentes". From which derives the suggestion: mistrust educational institutions, even - or especially - if they have money.
(ps: needless to say, not ALL academics are like that, etc)