4.5
What I loved about this book was the growth of the author's self-awareness, and her honesty about her flaws. In the beginning, she is filling up the hollowness of her life with religion as a way to feel whole. She applies to Teach for America as a way to "appear brave and generous when people asked what I was going to do when I graduated". She does the same when deciding to be a priest. She stays in relationships in which she is being used because she lacks the self-esteem to be alone and because she needs the approval granted to traditional relationships.
Through her time teaching in Compton, attending a church that allowed for diversity in thought, she realized: "pretending to be the person I thought other people needed me to be - the person I thought God needed me to be - was a kind of lie. It was deceitful and manipulative. Dishonest. The good things I did in the world had an ugly underside: I didn't do them for others. I did them for myself. I did them to make people love me." She attends divinity school, which is liberating in its theories of why the construct of God was created and how each of us constructs our own God in the form that we need, in her case, in the form of a father figure who would love her unconditionally. Her professor, Gordon Kaufman, puts it this way: "'The central question for theology ... is a practical question,'...'How are we to live? To what should we devote ourselves? To what causes give ourselves?' Theology that does not contribute significantly to struggles against inhumanity and injustice, he argues, has lost sight of its point of being." She realizes that "the classes I took in divinity school threw Christianity wide open. Christianity was not about single truths but about multiplicity, translations, silences, arguments, new voices. Asking questions, disagreeing and doubting were essential parts of faith, not anathemas to it."
She starts preaching, wanting to show others that God can take the doubting and the alternative views but soon finds out that the institutions of religion can't. She asks "What's faithful about hate?" "Theology, it seemed, was not the point of running a church. Being an institution was the point. Raising money, obeying the hierarchy, following rules, being right, counting the number of people in the pews, deciding whether or not to expand the building or get a new roof, caring for the community - that was church work. And I'm not sure many people in the congregation came to church to talk about God, either. They came to church because they wanted to be in a community with one another. They came to figure out how to live a life with meaning, how to do good work in the world, how to give back, how to be better people. They came to church to be fed, with bread and wine during Communion. They craved connection, and church seemed like a place where this might happen. God was almost incidental to the whole enterprise - background noise."
In the end, she leaves preaching and she leaves God. She is by no means perfect, nor has she figured everything out, but she no longer needs a father figure and religion to sustain her. "What if there is no grand narrative? What if there is only the meaning found in everyday ethics, in trying to live with integrity, in the messy, nebulous, complicated work of caring for what's around you - and for what's not - in trying not to harm another living being?"