Currently available on Kindle Unlimited, this is a good book but it is irritatingly packed with typos and random homophones that really ought to have been picked up by the second edition. There are more serious editing errors as well: the same quote used for an almost identical purpose only a few pages further on, references to a notion being expanded later on when the relevant section was in fact in the previous chapter, and reference to Hannibal Lecter having kidney with fava beans, rather than - famously - liver. That’s shoddy.
But as I said, this is a good book. I was delighted to find that this is a reference for writing entertainment, not art. Write what you know is described as a canard, novels are meant to be escapism rather than reflect reality, more is more, and the pithiest of quotes comes from Calvin and Hobbes. All the techniques discussed here are about keeping the reader immersed in the story, turning the pages, wondering what happens next. They address relevance and clarity of expression, but good writing comes second to good storytelling.
Some topics may be genre specific (such as researching real world locations), but the author does try to accommodate the quirks of speculative fiction. The classics are given due deference, but are kept secondary to contemporary tastes.
Some explanations of hoary chestnuts such as show don’t tell are clear and - importantly - applicable. Pacing is particularly usefully treated, and is central to most discussions. The central message is keep the story moving, at the structural level, at the scene level, at the paragraph level, at the individual sentence level. Forward motion, clarity, and keeping the writer’s presence to the minimum are all essential to the experience of reading entertainment.
Many topics discussed are pretty obvious. Many examples given are painfully obvious. They are also matters of taste. However, these are not persnickety rules, but a reminder of the things a writer ought to keep in mind to avoid boring the reader or jolting them out of immersion. And I noted to my discomfort that I do many of these awkward things in my writing, so this book has given me much to think about. It will often be consulted (hence the score), but mainly in editing. All these suggestions are there to add spit and polish rather than build a story from the ground up.