The writer accepts that all men are created free and equal in the state of nature and consent to be governed, which is rejected by Sir Robert Filmer, one of the other primary English proponent of absolute authority in the 1600s. This means he accepts that democracy or aristocracy are acceptable as long as the people consent to these forms of government.
One thing I found interesting is how Hobbes rejects eternal conscious torment in hell, or the existence of immaterial spirits who require exorcisms, as these things are used by the preachers to control their congregations. He also believed the sovereign must be in authority over the religious power or men will have two masters which will lead to instability and war, which is a rejection of the liberal principles of freedom of conscience, of thought and of religion.
Good book to read if you want to hear an alternative view as to what the scope and ends of power and sovereignty should be. Read Filmer to hear about an alternative source of that sovereignty.