In chapter one, the authors argue that “in most school settings, educators have focused more on completion of work and assignments than on a true development of understanding.” This statement captures a lot of my recent thinking about education: we need a paradigm shift that moves from teaching to learning. Simply because we’ve “taught” something doesn’t mean students have learned it.
This incredibly practical, yet thoughtful, book is centered around teachers asking “what kinds of thinking do I value and want to promote in my classroom?” and then asking “what kinds of thinking does this lesson force students to do?” To help teachers consider those questions, the book then outlines a score of “thinking routines” that not only guide students through specific content, but also give them habits of mind to approach all of their learning. I especially love that these routines are skills that students can apply to anything independent of a specific classroom. Empowering students with thinking skills is—in my opinion—vastly more important than making sure they remember the plot of To Kill a Mockingbird.
The book is well organized: it introduces a thinking routine, briefly outlines it, discusses appropriate content, steps, variations, assessment, and tips. Each routine concludes with a “Picture of Practice” that describes how a practicing teacher uses it in her classroom. This section was essential to helping me see the possibilities that I may not have noticed before.
Some of my favorite thinking routines in the book are:
1. Zoom In: look closely at a small bit of image that is revealed
2. 3-2-1 Bridge: a variation on the basic 3-2-1, which I’ve used before. This one has a second 3-2-1 at the end of the lesson, then asks students to discuss how their thinking has changed between the two.
3. Compass Points: students consider an idea/question/proposition use the compass points: E=excitements; W=worries; N=needs; S=stance, steps, or suggestions
4. Headlines: students condense the learning in the lesson to a headline that captures a key aspect
5. CSI: students generate a Color, Symbol, and Image that best represents the essence of an idea/theme
6. Generate-Sort-Connect-Elaborate: Concept Map (variation on concept maps that I like a lot and that’s too complex to explain here)
7. The Micro Lab Protocol: a discussion protocol for small groups that helps develop listening and speaking skills
8. Tug-of-War: students generate “tugs” that support each side of a dilemma and use this set up to process it.
The authors are careful to include all content areas and grade levels. This is an incredibly helpful teaching resource that I will return to for both work with students and with other education professionals.