If you put the story of True Crime Redux in a novel, they wouldn’t believe you. Editors would shake their heads. Too implausible. Nobody’s going to believe it.
That’s in part because a novel drives the mind-blowing real-world events that lead to the wheels of justice getting back on track in the case of a long-dormant, unsolved murder of a suburban housewife in 1973.
What’s hard to fathom is the author of the novel that reignites the case—a novel that took decades to germinate, write and find publication—came within two weeks of becoming the murder victim’s daughter-in-law. The morning Betty Frye was killed, Stephanie Kane talked to her on the phone. Later that day, Kane saw Betty Frye’s killer. Later that day, she was dead.
Certainly a galvanizing moment. Certainly a day you’re never going to forget. Especially, in part, because the case, at the time, wasn’t closed. Betty’s husband Duane was charged but the charges were later mysteriously dropped.
Care for another wrinkle on the emotional landscape? Young Stephanie thought her arrival on the scene as an outsider forming a new family with the Fryes’ son played a role in the motive for the killing.
About twenty years later, an older Stephanie Kane decides to write a mystery. When Stephanie Kane landed a publisher, the editors were wary. They asked for a series of changes to make sure that no reader would think Stephanie’s novel clung tightly to the reality she witnessed. The editors required Stephanie to move the timeline up ten years. Stephanie even switched her author surname to that of her second husband.
Sure, there were some rough similarities in the book that became Quiet Time to the events young Stephanie Shafer witnessed, but by the time it was published it had been 30 years since the murder and, well, it was fiction. (A line from the book’s description: “Sari Siegel is engaged to Tim Scott when his mother is found murdered. Sari barely knows the Scotts, but even she can sense the terrible secrets that seethe below the surface.”)
Quiet Time came out one week after 9/11. As Kane has said in interviews, “I was done with Quiet Time, but it wasn’t done with me.”
That’s because the sister of Duane Frye watched a rerun of a late-night defunct book show on public television that included an interview with Kane. And that sister, then 78 years old, relayed that Duane Frye had confessed to the murder. That opened a cold case and, suddenly, Quiet Time was in the crosshairs of the legal defense team. Why? Because Duane Frye’s lawyers tried to prove it was factual lies instead of fiction and subpoenaed all of Kane’s notes, correspondence and some 20 drafts of the novel under the theory that Kane and Duane’s sister had fabricated the confession in order to sell more books.
“My drafts, etc. were eventually protected, but the subpoena made me question what I’d done to real people to exorcise my own ghosts. I’d published three legal thrillers since Quiet Time, but the threat of having my creative processes scrutinized paralyzed me. For the eight years the case was in court, I wrote not a word,” Kane writes in the introduction to True Crime Redux.
Can you imagine being Stephanie Kane, back in court with Duane Frye staring you down?
Well, that brings us to True Crime Redux, Kane’s sterling account of how the real world inspired fiction that altered events in, yes, the real world.
True Crime Redux deconstructs these improbable events into 70 nugget-size chapters within 13 sections—Preface, 1973, The Scene, Statements, Collateral Damage, The Right Man, The Right Woman, 2005, The Cold Case, The Family, The Courtroom, Shooting the Survivors, and Coda. The book takes a kaleidoscopic look from all angles, breaking down events that spanned more than 40 years into manageable nuggets. Kane comes at the story with a cool kind of distance, but confronts her own emotions and role, as well, when needed.
In fact, True Crime Redux doesn’t lend itself to easy quotes, but here’s a sample of Kane’s matter-of-fact and engaging style.
“I met Doug at a karate studio in Boulder, Colorado. I’d applied to CU because it was 2000 miles from Brooklyn. But the moment the plane landed, I was in over my head. The dry wind, blazing sky, and strapping kids playing frisbee on a campus backed by mountain peaks felt unreal, like a Technicolor movie. I wandered into a karate studio and watched my future husband, Doug, throwing one perfect kick after another. With his crisp white gi and sun-streaked hair, he embodied everything foreign and exotic about Colorado. We moved in together that summer. And that fall he brought me home to meet his parents.”
There are twists and turns in the case around the original 1973 murder investigation, there are dramatic ebbs and flows as the cold case is pursued starting in 2005. The wheels of justice spin and sputter. It’s easy to see why all the legal grinding took its toll on Kane’s creative work.
In writing True Crime Redux, Kane sees her role in it but also tries to view the tale as a dispassionate outsider, too. It’s a tall order, but Kane pulls it off looking hard at all the evidence and thinking about all the ways one vicious crime gets distorted by time, by the fallibility of memory, and by the involvement of human beings who have a “gnawing need for answers.”
There are lots of quotes out there about comparing fiction and reality, but they all stem from Lord Byron’s assertion: “Truth is always strange; stranger than fiction.” In the case of True Crime Redux, “truth” needed a boost from fiction but Lord Byron sure wasn’t wrong.