Ravens is a very detailed account of the CIA’s covert operations in Laos during the Vietnam war of the 1960s. It covers everything from dips and peaks in American foreign policy on the matter, the nitty gritties of military decision making against the Pathet Lao and North Vietnam Neutralists, and personal stories on soldiers involved. I’ll summarize my thoughts on all three.
Ravens sometimes reads as an International Relations textbook, but without the whys and hows of policy. It spits facts at you in no specified order, and often devotes entire chapters to providing historical background. Personally, I think books that offer collected histories and individual accounts of war experiences should not concern themselves with providing the reader textbook knowledge except perhaps as a prologue. Kissinger, in particular, is not a figure that requires more than an hour of inattentive reading to understand. However, there was some pretty insightful information on what went down at the political tables to authorize the use of unprecedented tools of air power in Laos - next to nothing. Robbins does a good job of reminding us that the operation that he devotes 400 something pages to is actually one of the least strategized, most impulsive maneuvers on the part of the American government. There is next to no discipline in this war, and that stems from the fact that Laos, an entire country in itself, is nothing more than collateral damage in a wider conflict.
As someone with an idle interest in war strategy and the tussle between political and military decision-making, I always thought that the first military jargon-heavy book that I read would be a rush. Instead, I skimmed over at least 100 words on plane models and military ranks. The fact that Ravens reads as a university lecture by an ex-CIA guest speaker can be a recommendation or discreditation of the book, but if you are looking to expand your knowledge and nothing else, google Ravens on YouTube during lunchtime.
Personal stories on war are always monotonous; that is the catch when reading about military conflict - it is all the same. So I won’t complain about boredom here. (Although I will say I get the ick from these American Sniper renditions of military conflicts, and only feel rehearsed sympathy for characters). One Raven in the book mentions how he has trouble going scorched earth on enemy territory, but does not feel the same way about bombing settlements that have records of retaliation. Another one talks about how the Ravens connect with animals and pets in the absence of real, meaningful relationships (with women and family); this would have been a great segue into talking about the merits of friendship and camaraderie, but that only comes chapters later when it’s time to talk about shared trauma and grief.
I came across this book in Anne Fadiman’s The Spirit Catches You And You Fall Down, which is a documentation of a Hmong child’s experiences with epilepsy and other cerebral neurotic deficiencies, her treatment with American healthcare professionals, and the space Hmong families occupy in Western cultures. Fadiman claimed that Ravens was the first time Americans heard of the “secret” war in Laos in such great detail. Having loved her work, and interested in learning more about this, I was really looking forward to reading Ravens. Suffice to say, I have since had to read it twice because I did not retain anything the first time.