What do you think?
Rate this book
The Annotated Pride and Prejudice
This first-ever fully annotated edition of one of the most beloved novels in the world is a sheer delight for Jane Austen fans. Here is the complete text of Pride and Prejudice with more than 2,300 annotations on facing pages, including:
• Explanations of historical context
Rules of etiquette, class differences, the position of women, legal and economic realities, leisure activities, and more.
• Citations from Austen’s life, letters, and other writings
Parallels between the novel and Austen’s experience are revealed, along with writings that illuminate her beliefs and opinions.
• Definitions and clarifications
Archaic words, words still in use whose meanings have changed, and obscure passages are explained.
• Literary comments and analyses
Insightful notes highlight Austen’s artistry and point out the subtle ways she develops her characters and themes.
• Maps and illustrations
of places and objects mentioned in the novel.
• An introduction, a bibliography, and a detailed chronology of events
Of course, one can enjoy the novel without knowing the precise definition of a gentleman, or what it signifies that a character drives a coach rather than a hack chaise, or the rules governing social interaction at a ball, but readers of The Annotated Pride and Prejudice will find that these kinds of details add immeasurably to understanding and enjoying the intricate psychological interplay of Austen’s immortal characters.
• Explanations of historical context
Rules of etiquette, class differences, the position of women, legal and economic realities, leisure activities, and more.
• Citations from Austen’s life, letters, and other writings
Parallels between the novel and Austen’s experience are revealed, along with writings that illuminate her beliefs and opinions.
• Definitions and clarifications
Archaic words, words still in use whose meanings have changed, and obscure passages are explained.
• Literary comments and analyses
Insightful notes highlight Austen’s artistry and point out the subtle ways she develops her characters and themes.
• Maps and illustrations
of places and objects mentioned in the novel.
• An introduction, a bibliography, and a detailed chronology of events
Of course, one can enjoy the novel without knowing the precise definition of a gentleman, or what it signifies that a character drives a coach rather than a hack chaise, or the rules governing social interaction at a ball, but readers of The Annotated Pride and Prejudice will find that these kinds of details add immeasurably to understanding and enjoying the intricate psychological interplay of Austen’s immortal characters.
780 pages, Paperback
First published January 28, 1790
172 people are currently reading
733 people want to read
About the author
Jane Austen
3,892 books74.3k followersJane Austen was an English novelist known primarily for her six novels, which implicitly interpret, critique, and comment upon the English landed gentry at the end of the 18th century. Austen's plots often explore the dependence of women on marriage for the pursuit of favourable social standing and economic security. Her works are an implicit critique of the novels of sensibility of the second half of the 18th century and are part of the transition to 19th-century literary realism. Her deft use of social commentary, realism and biting irony have earned her acclaim among critics and scholars.
The anonymously published Sense and Sensibility (1811), Pride and Prejudice (1813), Mansfield Park (1814), and Emma (1816), were a modest success but brought her little fame in her lifetime. She wrote two other novels—Northanger Abbey and Persuasion, both published posthumously in 1817—and began another, eventually titled Sanditon, but died before its completion. She also left behind three volumes of juvenile writings in manuscript, the short epistolary novel Lady Susan, and the unfinished novel The Watsons.
Since her death Austen's novels have rarely been out of print. A significant transition in her reputation occurred in 1833, when they were republished in Richard Bentley's Standard Novels series (illustrated by Ferdinand Pickering and sold as a set). They gradually gained wide acclaim and popular readership. In 1869, fifty-two years after her death, her nephew's publication of A Memoir of Jane Austen introduced a compelling version of her writing career and supposedly uneventful life to an eager audience. Her work has inspired a large number of critical essays and has been included in many literary anthologies. Her novels have also inspired many films, including 1940's Pride and Prejudice, 1995's Sense and Sensibility and 2016's Love & Friendship.
The anonymously published Sense and Sensibility (1811), Pride and Prejudice (1813), Mansfield Park (1814), and Emma (1816), were a modest success but brought her little fame in her lifetime. She wrote two other novels—Northanger Abbey and Persuasion, both published posthumously in 1817—and began another, eventually titled Sanditon, but died before its completion. She also left behind three volumes of juvenile writings in manuscript, the short epistolary novel Lady Susan, and the unfinished novel The Watsons.
Since her death Austen's novels have rarely been out of print. A significant transition in her reputation occurred in 1833, when they were republished in Richard Bentley's Standard Novels series (illustrated by Ferdinand Pickering and sold as a set). They gradually gained wide acclaim and popular readership. In 1869, fifty-two years after her death, her nephew's publication of A Memoir of Jane Austen introduced a compelling version of her writing career and supposedly uneventful life to an eager audience. Her work has inspired a large number of critical essays and has been included in many literary anthologies. Her novels have also inspired many films, including 1940's Pride and Prejudice, 1995's Sense and Sensibility and 2016's Love & Friendship.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 324 reviews
January 9, 2016
For several reasons, I wanted to try an annotated version for my most recent P&P re-read. There are a few out there, but I've heard such good things about David Shapard's annotated versions that I wanted to see for myself. Two of my reasons for the reading was to a. enjoy yet another read through of P&P, but b. I wanted to get as much background information I could on the story and the historical time it was set in. And did this version do it for me? Indeed, it did.
The structure of the book was an introduction, then it was set up so the story was on the left and the notes on the right, and then afterward was a chronological timeline of the story, maps, and a bibliography. The notes are numbered and correspond to numbers in the text. I found it interesting that David Shapard chose the original edition instead of one of the newer ones. Now, I wonder which editions I've read in the past because there were a few times when sentences were credited to different characters or once in a while a paragraph was split or not split. And then there were the original typos that were fun to have pointed out. There were notations that caught editor errors like time frames not lining up or descriptions reflecting the fact that the story was original written fifteen years before Austen pulled it out again, updated it, and had it published. Some spots didn't get caught for an update. I would have never noticed whether people at the time ate a heavy supper, a light supper, or no supper at all, but I'll bet those who read it a couple hundred years ago did.
It is a scholarly work that is flexible. Anyone can read and enjoy it.
The notes were extensive and took several forms. Sometimes the notes explained and defined older, archaic words or words that have evolved to mean something different in our time. I played a little game to test my knowledge by trying to guess meanings before I read them. I was right pretty often, but I noticed that sometimes even if I got the idea sometimes there were nuances that changed my perception. Like sometimes I thought a character was being serious when they were teasing and at other times I thought they were teasing when they were serious.
Another helpful part of the notes were the explanations about words or phrases that came from popular sources at the time. My perception is always that I'm reading a classic and in truth it was written as a contemporary. I knew this in theory, but it was fascinating when the notes pointed out several references that came from books or plays or current philosophies.
And beyond words or cultural references were the additional delving into the characters and themes of the story. Shapard admits that some is conjecture, but he took the time to work through outside sources like Jane's own letters or information gleaned from other family sources regarding P&P so that he could speak with some authority about the facts and his conjectures.
Naturally, I was most struck by what was said about Elizabeth and Darcy, but the notes enhanced my knowledge of all the supporting characters so that I could see actions and words in a potential different light.
I thought the addition of illustrations and drawings along the way for things like vehicles, furnishings, clothes, and the maps went a long way to helping me sort out things that were a bit obscure in the past. Like I heard things like traveling chaise or barouche, but it was neat to see the illustrations and get an explanation for what type of travel they are good for. Like a chaise and four is good for distance travel, only has seats facing forward, and seats three. This is significant knowledge because it was how the Bennets and Colonel Forester figured out that Wickham and Lydia didn't continue their flight beyond London. They left the chaise at a posting inn and took another vehicle into London which was proof that they weren't going all the distance to Scotland. See? Something new and a fun addition to my Austen lore.
I recommend it whole-heartedly to the Austen lover and of course the Austen researchers. However, for newbies, the extras may be more distraction than help since the notes pop up frequently. Not saying a newbie shouldn't pick this up, but beware that there's a potential for distraction.
All in all, this was a treasure trove and one I will be delving into again and again.
The structure of the book was an introduction, then it was set up so the story was on the left and the notes on the right, and then afterward was a chronological timeline of the story, maps, and a bibliography. The notes are numbered and correspond to numbers in the text. I found it interesting that David Shapard chose the original edition instead of one of the newer ones. Now, I wonder which editions I've read in the past because there were a few times when sentences were credited to different characters or once in a while a paragraph was split or not split. And then there were the original typos that were fun to have pointed out. There were notations that caught editor errors like time frames not lining up or descriptions reflecting the fact that the story was original written fifteen years before Austen pulled it out again, updated it, and had it published. Some spots didn't get caught for an update. I would have never noticed whether people at the time ate a heavy supper, a light supper, or no supper at all, but I'll bet those who read it a couple hundred years ago did.
It is a scholarly work that is flexible. Anyone can read and enjoy it.
The notes were extensive and took several forms. Sometimes the notes explained and defined older, archaic words or words that have evolved to mean something different in our time. I played a little game to test my knowledge by trying to guess meanings before I read them. I was right pretty often, but I noticed that sometimes even if I got the idea sometimes there were nuances that changed my perception. Like sometimes I thought a character was being serious when they were teasing and at other times I thought they were teasing when they were serious.
Another helpful part of the notes were the explanations about words or phrases that came from popular sources at the time. My perception is always that I'm reading a classic and in truth it was written as a contemporary. I knew this in theory, but it was fascinating when the notes pointed out several references that came from books or plays or current philosophies.
And beyond words or cultural references were the additional delving into the characters and themes of the story. Shapard admits that some is conjecture, but he took the time to work through outside sources like Jane's own letters or information gleaned from other family sources regarding P&P so that he could speak with some authority about the facts and his conjectures.
Naturally, I was most struck by what was said about Elizabeth and Darcy, but the notes enhanced my knowledge of all the supporting characters so that I could see actions and words in a potential different light.
I thought the addition of illustrations and drawings along the way for things like vehicles, furnishings, clothes, and the maps went a long way to helping me sort out things that were a bit obscure in the past. Like I heard things like traveling chaise or barouche, but it was neat to see the illustrations and get an explanation for what type of travel they are good for. Like a chaise and four is good for distance travel, only has seats facing forward, and seats three. This is significant knowledge because it was how the Bennets and Colonel Forester figured out that Wickham and Lydia didn't continue their flight beyond London. They left the chaise at a posting inn and took another vehicle into London which was proof that they weren't going all the distance to Scotland. See? Something new and a fun addition to my Austen lore.
I recommend it whole-heartedly to the Austen lover and of course the Austen researchers. However, for newbies, the extras may be more distraction than help since the notes pop up frequently. Not saying a newbie shouldn't pick this up, but beware that there's a potential for distraction.
All in all, this was a treasure trove and one I will be delving into again and again.
May 15, 2020
"Usted es demasiado generosa para jugar con mis sentimientos. Si los suyos siguen siendo los mismos del pasado abril, dígamelo en seguida. Mi afecto y mis deseos no han cambiado, pero una palabra suya me silenciará para siempre."
— Jane Austen, 'Orgullo y prejuicio'
No falla. Cada relectura de 'Orgullo y prejuicio' termina para mi de la misma forma. Ojos soñadores, una sonrisa de satisfacción en el rostro y un corazón henchido de pura alegría...¡qué absoluta delicia la de esta novela y qué ingenio el de Jane Austen!
'Orgullo y prejuicio' es un libro brillante, ingenioso y alegre repleto de escenas memorables.
¿Quién puede resistirse al toque cómico de algunos de sus personajes; a esos diálogos punzantes e inteligentes entre sus protagonistas; a esos enredos que hacen avanzar convenientemente la trama?
Y, como no, ¿quién puede resistirse al romance entre Lizzy y Darcy?
¡Ay, esos primeros comentarios sobre el poder de unos ojos hermosos en el rostro de cierta joven!
— Jane Austen, 'Orgullo y prejuicio'
No falla. Cada relectura de 'Orgullo y prejuicio' termina para mi de la misma forma. Ojos soñadores, una sonrisa de satisfacción en el rostro y un corazón henchido de pura alegría...¡qué absoluta delicia la de esta novela y qué ingenio el de Jane Austen!
'Orgullo y prejuicio' es un libro brillante, ingenioso y alegre repleto de escenas memorables.
¿Quién puede resistirse al toque cómico de algunos de sus personajes; a esos diálogos punzantes e inteligentes entre sus protagonistas; a esos enredos que hacen avanzar convenientemente la trama?
Y, como no, ¿quién puede resistirse al romance entre Lizzy y Darcy?
¡Ay, esos primeros comentarios sobre el poder de unos ojos hermosos en el rostro de cierta joven!
April 21, 2025
I love Shapard's annotations!
4/21/2025 What he said!!!
4/21/2025 What he said!!!
March 4, 2025
(reread 02/2025) once again, this just gets better with each reread, elizabeth and darcy will always be it for me.
i did really love this annotated edition as well!! will be reading the other jane austen’s novels in this edition.
—————
(reread - 10/2021) every single time i read this book i end up loving it even more than i thought was possible, and it gets even funnier then i remembered it to be
this will always be the ultimate comfort book for me ❤️
—————
(reread - 06/2020) I don’t have enough words to say how much I love this book. No matter how many times I read it, it only gets better.
Jane Austen’s writing is everything, and Elizabeth Bennet and Fitzwilliam Darcy will forever live in my heart as my all time favorite couple.
”I cannot fix the hour, or the spot, or the look, or the words, which laid the foundation. It is too long ago. I was in the middle before I knew that I had begun.”
i did really love this annotated edition as well!! will be reading the other jane austen’s novels in this edition.
—————
(reread - 10/2021) every single time i read this book i end up loving it even more than i thought was possible, and it gets even funnier then i remembered it to be
this will always be the ultimate comfort book for me ❤️
—————
(reread - 06/2020) I don’t have enough words to say how much I love this book. No matter how many times I read it, it only gets better.
Jane Austen’s writing is everything, and Elizabeth Bennet and Fitzwilliam Darcy will forever live in my heart as my all time favorite couple.
”I cannot fix the hour, or the spot, or the look, or the words, which laid the foundation. It is too long ago. I was in the middle before I knew that I had begun.”
May 17, 2025
LiterariTea Book Club
The ultimate in romance and the quintessential love story, Austen never gets old! I just read this 2 years ago and had no plans to read it again so soon. But when one of your IRL book clubs chooses this for its monthly read, it’s just too hard to pass up! This time I decided to read an annotated version and found it most helpful and informative and would recommend it to anyone who wants to dive deeper into words, phrases, time period, illustrations and much more. With this year being Jane Austen’s 250th birthday and the 25th anniversary of the Kiera Knightly movie from 2005, doing a reread seemed apropos. (Yes, I have watched the 1995 BBC production with Colin Firth as Darcy which is my favorite!!)
This story will never get old, it is so perfectly timeless. The characters that Austen created are perfectly drawn and each has such unique qualities that they stand the test of time. The Bennet sisters: Jane, Elizabeth, Mary, Catherine (Kitty) and Lydia. Gentle Jane is pleasant the most beautiful; Elizabeth (Lizzy) is sharp-witted and outspoken. Mary is subdued and bookish. Kitty is impressionable and highly influenced by Lydia who is immature and selfish.
Mr. and Mrs. Bennet are not necessarily the best at parenting: Mr. Bennet surrounded by so many women withdraws to his library as his coping mechanism. He has a dry and sarcastic sense of humor (most likely because of all of the estrogen!) and favors his second daughter, Elizabeth. If I were to choose the better parent, I would pick him, despite his decision to let Lydia go to Brighton! And then there is Mrs. Bennet who is utterly insufferable. Her hysterical behavior becomes tiresome because of all of her foolishness and silly antics. She really just wants to see her daughters married as the one thing she cares for the most in the world. She is consumed by this but only seems to alienate the ones she means to attract! Lydia is her favorite.
Elizabeth is the most intelligent Bennet and the most admirable. She can be clever and her come backs are sharp and witty, especially in her dialogue with Lady de Bourgh whose condescending attitude is off-putting. Elizabeth’s judgment may not be accurate at first, but as an endearing and charming young woman, she finds out how prideful and prejudiced she was when she realizes her errors.
I am happier even than Jane. She only smiles, I laugh.
Darcy is the crème de la crème of marriage potential. He has the wealth, the well-established family and naturally, the good looks! However intelligent he may be, he demonstrates his pride and harsh judgment of Elizabeth as his haughtiness keeps him from a joyful courtship. Darcy’s initial distaste for the Bennet’s comes full circle when he is humbled by rejection, and he goes against his wealthy Aunt – Lady de Bourgh.
In vain have I struggled. It will not do. My feelings will not be repressed. You must allow me to tell you how ardently I admire and love you.
This will always be a favorite that will be on my list of rereads as long as I live!
The ultimate in romance and the quintessential love story, Austen never gets old! I just read this 2 years ago and had no plans to read it again so soon. But when one of your IRL book clubs chooses this for its monthly read, it’s just too hard to pass up! This time I decided to read an annotated version and found it most helpful and informative and would recommend it to anyone who wants to dive deeper into words, phrases, time period, illustrations and much more. With this year being Jane Austen’s 250th birthday and the 25th anniversary of the Kiera Knightly movie from 2005, doing a reread seemed apropos. (Yes, I have watched the 1995 BBC production with Colin Firth as Darcy which is my favorite!!)
This story will never get old, it is so perfectly timeless. The characters that Austen created are perfectly drawn and each has such unique qualities that they stand the test of time. The Bennet sisters: Jane, Elizabeth, Mary, Catherine (Kitty) and Lydia. Gentle Jane is pleasant the most beautiful; Elizabeth (Lizzy) is sharp-witted and outspoken. Mary is subdued and bookish. Kitty is impressionable and highly influenced by Lydia who is immature and selfish.
Mr. and Mrs. Bennet are not necessarily the best at parenting: Mr. Bennet surrounded by so many women withdraws to his library as his coping mechanism. He has a dry and sarcastic sense of humor (most likely because of all of the estrogen!) and favors his second daughter, Elizabeth. If I were to choose the better parent, I would pick him, despite his decision to let Lydia go to Brighton! And then there is Mrs. Bennet who is utterly insufferable. Her hysterical behavior becomes tiresome because of all of her foolishness and silly antics. She really just wants to see her daughters married as the one thing she cares for the most in the world. She is consumed by this but only seems to alienate the ones she means to attract! Lydia is her favorite.
Elizabeth is the most intelligent Bennet and the most admirable. She can be clever and her come backs are sharp and witty, especially in her dialogue with Lady de Bourgh whose condescending attitude is off-putting. Elizabeth’s judgment may not be accurate at first, but as an endearing and charming young woman, she finds out how prideful and prejudiced she was when she realizes her errors.
I am happier even than Jane. She only smiles, I laugh.
Darcy is the crème de la crème of marriage potential. He has the wealth, the well-established family and naturally, the good looks! However intelligent he may be, he demonstrates his pride and harsh judgment of Elizabeth as his haughtiness keeps him from a joyful courtship. Darcy’s initial distaste for the Bennet’s comes full circle when he is humbled by rejection, and he goes against his wealthy Aunt – Lady de Bourgh.
In vain have I struggled. It will not do. My feelings will not be repressed. You must allow me to tell you how ardently I admire and love you.
This will always be a favorite that will be on my list of rereads as long as I live!
June 6, 2013
Obviously I'm going to rate P&P 5 stars, but this edition is also star-worthy. This series of Austen's novels, edited and annotated by David M. Shaprd, is absolutely indispensable to Austen lovers and anyone interested in the Regency period. Shapard's thousands of notes include information on everything from furniture and clothing to social mores and literary themes.
Do NOT read this edition if you haven't read P&P before. There are spoilers, and Shapard doesn't warn about them. He gives all-cap spoiler-alerts in his "Emma," so a quick glance at an annotation can warn a new reader not to read that particular snippet; but he assumes that readers of P&P are already familiar with the story. (Actually, he doesn't assume that -- he warns readers in the introduction that he'll be ruining some surprises.)
Do NOT read this edition if you haven't read P&P before. There are spoilers, and Shapard doesn't warn about them. He gives all-cap spoiler-alerts in his "Emma," so a quick glance at an annotation can warn a new reader not to read that particular snippet; but he assumes that readers of P&P are already familiar with the story. (Actually, he doesn't assume that -- he warns readers in the introduction that he'll be ruining some surprises.)
July 16, 2022
Enriching My Understanding, Appreciation, and Love for Pride and Prejudice
Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
Source: Purchased
If you been here awhile then you may already know I like to spend the beginning of each year reading an annotated edition of a Jane Austen novel. Although this is the first time it has taken me over a month to read (I blame my work). I’m alternating between the annotated editions by Harvard University Press and the annotated series by David M. Shapard Back in 2014 I read and reviewed Pride and Prejudice: An Annotated Edition edited by Patricia Meyer Spacks.
With all my reviews of annotated editions, my ratings and comments are based on the annotations and observations made by the editors and not Jane Austen’s magnificent and beloved masterpieces.
I hope you find this breakdown helpful!
THE INTRODUCTION:
There is plenty of astute analysis to explore in Mr. Shapard’s introduction, but my favorite points he brought up pertained to what makes Jane Austen’s novels unique for her time, and specifically what makes Pride and Prejudice unique when compared to her other novels. I haven’t read much of Frances Burney or Samuel Richardson, but I greatly appreciate learning that, compared to their works, Jane Austen’s novels are more rooted in verisimilitude and that she distinctly gives her characters the freedom of choice. In addition, while I may have concluded on my own that P&P is the Jane Austen novel most focused upon romantic relationships (how many marriages take place?), I did not make the realization that it was the only novel where both the hero and heroine make crucial errors. I think the realism she shows with these characters and the journey of their mistakes and growth might have a lot to do with why Pride and Prejudice is so many readers’ favorite.
THE ANNOTATIONS AND ILLUSTRATIONS:
The annotations for the text are plentiful, informative, and analytical. Word usage, customs, Regency references are all thoroughly explained. But what I really enjoy is when David M. Shapard shares his own insights, revelations, and commentary. I love the personal touch, and I appreciate that his notes include more of his own deductions and scrutiny, and not just other scholars quoted.
The illustrations are appropriately selected and placed. One downside of this edition versus Harvard University Press is the absence of color images on a large scale. These images, while printed clearly and crisply are black and white.
SOME THINGS I LEARNED/NOTICED:
- Mr. Bingley is Young!: It might be my own mistaken memory or how oftentimes Austenesque novels portray Darcy and Bingley as mates from university, but I completely forgot that Mr. Bingley is 22! That puts some of his immaturity and weaknesses of character into a different perspective!
- A Clergyman’s Lot: Because of an influx of ordained clergyman, only 20% of clergymen received an appointment within five years of being ordained, and some never did and worked as assistants their whole lives! No wonder Mr. Collins is so excessive in his praise and gratitude of Lady Catherine!
- Elizabeth is Contrary: She holds Mr. Darcy’s implacable resentment against him, but sister-friend has some implacable resentment of her own. Also, while she is disappointed with Charlotte’s marital prudence, she openly forgives and defends Mr. Wickham’s marital prudence when he is in pursuit of Miss King.
- The Lucases Be Plentiful: Not all are prominent in the story, but with the mentions of daughters and sons added together there are at least seven children in total! Again, this puts a new light on Charlotte’s situation and actions.
- Elizabeth’s Evolution: Talk about understanding and witnessing a character’s journey through their emotions and the turning of their mind and/or heart! Jane Austen’s representation of Elizabeth Bennet’s evolving feelings for Mr. Darcy is brilliant and perfect. I really appreciate how it is laid out, how it happens gradually and believably, and how Elizabeth becomes aware and reanalyzes her own character. Plot twist: Mr. Darcy isn’t the only one guilty of pride and vanity!
- The Proposal Scene: Even though I’ve read and seen it take place numerous times before, it still fills me with such awe and admiration. There is such fiery emotion, such intensity in their words and actions. It is so vibrant with strong feeling. It may be blasphemous to say, but I don’t know if I yet to see it portrayed on screen as magnificently and powerfully as it is portrayed on page.
- Pemberley Shades: I need to laugh at myself for this one! When Lady C made her exclamation about the “shades of Pemberley” being polluted, I was thinking shades like window covering, and that the Elizabeth’s inferior relations would dirty and befoul them. But it looks like the term would more likely apply to the grounds of Pemberley and all the shades of light and darkness produced by trees.
COMPARING HARVARD UNIVERSITY PRESS AND DAVID SHAPARD EDITIONS:
It is a super tough decision to make because I equally loved Patricia Meyer Spacks’ Pride and Prejudice: An Annotated Edition – her comments are equally astute and insightful, but I feel like I may have learned a bit more and delved into P&P a little bit deeper with David Shapard’s annotations. So my vote is once again for David Shapard.
CONCLUSION:
I emphatically urge all Austenesque readers and Jane Austen admirers to read annotated editions of Jane Austen’s novels. The reading experience will be time-consuming, but the gift you give to yourself is immeasurable. What could be better than broadening your understanding and appreciation of Jane Austen’s genius? If you have yet to read any annotated editions of Jane Austen’s novels, I’d recommend starting with The Annotated Pride and Prejudice by David M. Shapard, because it may very well be the best.
Austenesque Reviews
Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
Source: Purchased
If you been here awhile then you may already know I like to spend the beginning of each year reading an annotated edition of a Jane Austen novel. Although this is the first time it has taken me over a month to read (I blame my work). I’m alternating between the annotated editions by Harvard University Press and the annotated series by David M. Shapard Back in 2014 I read and reviewed Pride and Prejudice: An Annotated Edition edited by Patricia Meyer Spacks.
With all my reviews of annotated editions, my ratings and comments are based on the annotations and observations made by the editors and not Jane Austen’s magnificent and beloved masterpieces.
I hope you find this breakdown helpful!
THE INTRODUCTION:
There is plenty of astute analysis to explore in Mr. Shapard’s introduction, but my favorite points he brought up pertained to what makes Jane Austen’s novels unique for her time, and specifically what makes Pride and Prejudice unique when compared to her other novels. I haven’t read much of Frances Burney or Samuel Richardson, but I greatly appreciate learning that, compared to their works, Jane Austen’s novels are more rooted in verisimilitude and that she distinctly gives her characters the freedom of choice. In addition, while I may have concluded on my own that P&P is the Jane Austen novel most focused upon romantic relationships (how many marriages take place?), I did not make the realization that it was the only novel where both the hero and heroine make crucial errors. I think the realism she shows with these characters and the journey of their mistakes and growth might have a lot to do with why Pride and Prejudice is so many readers’ favorite.
THE ANNOTATIONS AND ILLUSTRATIONS:
The annotations for the text are plentiful, informative, and analytical. Word usage, customs, Regency references are all thoroughly explained. But what I really enjoy is when David M. Shapard shares his own insights, revelations, and commentary. I love the personal touch, and I appreciate that his notes include more of his own deductions and scrutiny, and not just other scholars quoted.
The illustrations are appropriately selected and placed. One downside of this edition versus Harvard University Press is the absence of color images on a large scale. These images, while printed clearly and crisply are black and white.
SOME THINGS I LEARNED/NOTICED:
- Mr. Bingley is Young!: It might be my own mistaken memory or how oftentimes Austenesque novels portray Darcy and Bingley as mates from university, but I completely forgot that Mr. Bingley is 22! That puts some of his immaturity and weaknesses of character into a different perspective!
- A Clergyman’s Lot: Because of an influx of ordained clergyman, only 20% of clergymen received an appointment within five years of being ordained, and some never did and worked as assistants their whole lives! No wonder Mr. Collins is so excessive in his praise and gratitude of Lady Catherine!
- Elizabeth is Contrary: She holds Mr. Darcy’s implacable resentment against him, but sister-friend has some implacable resentment of her own. Also, while she is disappointed with Charlotte’s marital prudence, she openly forgives and defends Mr. Wickham’s marital prudence when he is in pursuit of Miss King.
- The Lucases Be Plentiful: Not all are prominent in the story, but with the mentions of daughters and sons added together there are at least seven children in total! Again, this puts a new light on Charlotte’s situation and actions.
- Elizabeth’s Evolution: Talk about understanding and witnessing a character’s journey through their emotions and the turning of their mind and/or heart! Jane Austen’s representation of Elizabeth Bennet’s evolving feelings for Mr. Darcy is brilliant and perfect. I really appreciate how it is laid out, how it happens gradually and believably, and how Elizabeth becomes aware and reanalyzes her own character. Plot twist: Mr. Darcy isn’t the only one guilty of pride and vanity!
- The Proposal Scene: Even though I’ve read and seen it take place numerous times before, it still fills me with such awe and admiration. There is such fiery emotion, such intensity in their words and actions. It is so vibrant with strong feeling. It may be blasphemous to say, but I don’t know if I yet to see it portrayed on screen as magnificently and powerfully as it is portrayed on page.
- Pemberley Shades: I need to laugh at myself for this one! When Lady C made her exclamation about the “shades of Pemberley” being polluted, I was thinking shades like window covering, and that the Elizabeth’s inferior relations would dirty and befoul them. But it looks like the term would more likely apply to the grounds of Pemberley and all the shades of light and darkness produced by trees.
COMPARING HARVARD UNIVERSITY PRESS AND DAVID SHAPARD EDITIONS:
It is a super tough decision to make because I equally loved Patricia Meyer Spacks’ Pride and Prejudice: An Annotated Edition – her comments are equally astute and insightful, but I feel like I may have learned a bit more and delved into P&P a little bit deeper with David Shapard’s annotations. So my vote is once again for David Shapard.
CONCLUSION:
I emphatically urge all Austenesque readers and Jane Austen admirers to read annotated editions of Jane Austen’s novels. The reading experience will be time-consuming, but the gift you give to yourself is immeasurable. What could be better than broadening your understanding and appreciation of Jane Austen’s genius? If you have yet to read any annotated editions of Jane Austen’s novels, I’d recommend starting with The Annotated Pride and Prejudice by David M. Shapard, because it may very well be the best.
Austenesque Reviews
February 10, 2017
What beautiful writing did I come across?? It embellished me in the literal sense, I was happy right after I had read it. This novel, I think was an eye opener without my noticing into the world of nobility and their romances!!
How was it possible to assign this book as required reading so early on in life as high school? I believe this should be read by adults for men to really know the tactics of treating ladies and women not to rush aimlessly for the wrong man. How beautifully these two concepts were expressed together in the same novel.
This novel has been repeatedly recommended to me by people on GoodReads, and now I completely understand why. It's because it refines you as a person in your manners as you read. I never expected to want to speak like Jane and analyze situations in the way Elizabeth handles them.
When writing reviews, many people rewrite what they just read to emphasize their understanding of what they read; however, I myself express what I read. Mr. Darcy is written as the haughty, proud character I see around me; yet his sensibility and honor of Elizabeth is truly something for most men to learn. Most men nowadays are not able to treat a woman in the way deserving, which is extremely sad.
Who could have thought that my way towards reading will change because of Mr. Darcy in 2017? In 2016, I'd say it was Mr. Rochester from Jane Eyre, who tickled my senses and so changed my personal choice of genres.
I loved the writing style emphasizing the Bennets' family happenings with beautifully crafted characters with their own individual behaviors and characteristic traits! Moody Mrs. Bennet did it for me. She was worrisome of having all her daughters married at once, fretting over what's petty with Mr. Bennet on her side to soothe crowded situations. The kindness of Jane is extraordinarily touching, while Elizabeth's stubbornness is so evident, especially when first communicating with Mr. Darcy, leading up to his first proposal.
The change in behavior is evident, because they both felt they were wrong by judging each other on first glance. Elizabeth's stubbornness toward him though was heart cracking, when he was almost begging to marry her through proposing multiple times. This part broke my heart, she doubted him loving her and she wasn't in for it.
As I'm writing my thoughts, I'm observing that this book builds a personality in the reader, who is busy picking favorites and making enemies throughout the book. Jane Austen's writing style forces you to do that I believe. It's so evident that the story relates a comedy; however, I know for sure that this is the comedy of it's class! So beautiful, I wanted it to last forever!! :)
How was it possible to assign this book as required reading so early on in life as high school? I believe this should be read by adults for men to really know the tactics of treating ladies and women not to rush aimlessly for the wrong man. How beautifully these two concepts were expressed together in the same novel.
This novel has been repeatedly recommended to me by people on GoodReads, and now I completely understand why. It's because it refines you as a person in your manners as you read. I never expected to want to speak like Jane and analyze situations in the way Elizabeth handles them.
When writing reviews, many people rewrite what they just read to emphasize their understanding of what they read; however, I myself express what I read. Mr. Darcy is written as the haughty, proud character I see around me; yet his sensibility and honor of Elizabeth is truly something for most men to learn. Most men nowadays are not able to treat a woman in the way deserving, which is extremely sad.
Who could have thought that my way towards reading will change because of Mr. Darcy in 2017? In 2016, I'd say it was Mr. Rochester from Jane Eyre, who tickled my senses and so changed my personal choice of genres.
I loved the writing style emphasizing the Bennets' family happenings with beautifully crafted characters with their own individual behaviors and characteristic traits! Moody Mrs. Bennet did it for me. She was worrisome of having all her daughters married at once, fretting over what's petty with Mr. Bennet on her side to soothe crowded situations. The kindness of Jane is extraordinarily touching, while Elizabeth's stubbornness is so evident, especially when first communicating with Mr. Darcy, leading up to his first proposal.
The change in behavior is evident, because they both felt they were wrong by judging each other on first glance. Elizabeth's stubbornness toward him though was heart cracking, when he was almost begging to marry her through proposing multiple times. This part broke my heart, she doubted him loving her and she wasn't in for it.
As I'm writing my thoughts, I'm observing that this book builds a personality in the reader, who is busy picking favorites and making enemies throughout the book. Jane Austen's writing style forces you to do that I believe. It's so evident that the story relates a comedy; however, I know for sure that this is the comedy of it's class! So beautiful, I wanted it to last forever!! :)
This entire review has been hidden because of spoilers.
September 10, 2024
● FMC is "not like other girls"
● Problematic MMC
● Evil OW
● Big misunderstandings
● NO spice
Just another "plain yet beautiful" heroine who falls for a tall, handsome, rich alphahole.
At least the grovel was good. ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
● Problematic MMC
● Evil OW
● Big misunderstandings
● NO spice
Just another "plain yet beautiful" heroine who falls for a tall, handsome, rich alphahole.
At least the grovel was good. ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
May 16, 2024
All the stars. I can't believe I hated this book at any point in my life. I absolutely devoured this and am in the process of buying the rest of Austen's works.
August 27, 2022
This review is not of Pride and Prejudice itself but rather of the specific edition annotated by David M. Shapard.
I have read Pride and Prejudice many times in many editions but this is the first time I have read Shapard’s annotated edition, and I have to say I don’t like it very much. His notes, when they restrict themselves to matters of wording or history, are fine, but those are in the minority, swamped by overly intrusive comments that interpret the action and foreshadow the plot.
Choosing what to annotate and what to leave alone must be challenging when it comes to a classic. Carefully considered notes enrich the reader’s understanding but it must be a challenge to know where to stop. Shapard apparently set no limits on himself, to the point that I would describe him as the Lady Catherine of annotators: the majority of the notes are written in a spirit of her infamous moment of instructing her listeners “what weather they were to have on the morrow.” He feels compelled to warn readers every time a character says something that might mislead them, and to hint at future events to the point of spoiling the plot. At the Netherfield ball, for instance, Elizabeth Bennet observes Mr. Darcy observing her mother. Shapard notes, “Elizabeth’s surmise of Darcy’s careful attention to Mrs. Bennet will turn out to be correct.” Nobody needed that note, dude!
Similarly, he repeatedly explains characters to the reader rather than allowing the reader to form her own judgment. Where the text says of Darcy, “He was struggling for the appearance of composure, and would not open his lips, till he believed himself to have attained it,” Shapard notes. “Even here Darcy strives to avoid weakness, in this case the weakness of losing self-control and speaking under the influence of too much emotion and anger.” Duh, really? This paperback edition is nearly 800 pages long, and it could have been cut in half. You would think he was paid by the word.
On the other hand, Shapard’s edition could be very useful to a modern reader when noting all the ways in which changes in the meaning and force of words over the intervening centuries might skew our understanding of the text. It is useful for readers to know that “disgusting” was a much milder term of distaste in the early nineteenth century than it is now, more like the French dégoûter, to have a distaste for. The difference in the meaning of “temper” (not a mood of wrath but a person’s general disposition or temperament) is important too. He is also very skilled on the whole at pointing out the social significance of objects and behaviors that would have been clear to Austen’s contemporaries but might go over the head of a modern reader. To my understanding, he got most of those notes right. And he has occasional valuable insights into Jane Austen’s thinking, such as the spot near the end where he points out “what may be the central ideal in Jane Austen, that of love as a force to perfect our characters.” I would have appreciated more of that type of contextualization.
Unfortunately, my overall takeaway from his notes was that of being taken through the text by a high school teacher bent on leading his students to exactly his own personal reading of the text. He should have left out the over-explaining and the foreshadowing.
I have read Pride and Prejudice many times in many editions but this is the first time I have read Shapard’s annotated edition, and I have to say I don’t like it very much. His notes, when they restrict themselves to matters of wording or history, are fine, but those are in the minority, swamped by overly intrusive comments that interpret the action and foreshadow the plot.
Choosing what to annotate and what to leave alone must be challenging when it comes to a classic. Carefully considered notes enrich the reader’s understanding but it must be a challenge to know where to stop. Shapard apparently set no limits on himself, to the point that I would describe him as the Lady Catherine of annotators: the majority of the notes are written in a spirit of her infamous moment of instructing her listeners “what weather they were to have on the morrow.” He feels compelled to warn readers every time a character says something that might mislead them, and to hint at future events to the point of spoiling the plot. At the Netherfield ball, for instance, Elizabeth Bennet observes Mr. Darcy observing her mother. Shapard notes, “Elizabeth’s surmise of Darcy’s careful attention to Mrs. Bennet will turn out to be correct.” Nobody needed that note, dude!
Similarly, he repeatedly explains characters to the reader rather than allowing the reader to form her own judgment. Where the text says of Darcy, “He was struggling for the appearance of composure, and would not open his lips, till he believed himself to have attained it,” Shapard notes. “Even here Darcy strives to avoid weakness, in this case the weakness of losing self-control and speaking under the influence of too much emotion and anger.” Duh, really? This paperback edition is nearly 800 pages long, and it could have been cut in half. You would think he was paid by the word.
On the other hand, Shapard’s edition could be very useful to a modern reader when noting all the ways in which changes in the meaning and force of words over the intervening centuries might skew our understanding of the text. It is useful for readers to know that “disgusting” was a much milder term of distaste in the early nineteenth century than it is now, more like the French dégoûter, to have a distaste for. The difference in the meaning of “temper” (not a mood of wrath but a person’s general disposition or temperament) is important too. He is also very skilled on the whole at pointing out the social significance of objects and behaviors that would have been clear to Austen’s contemporaries but might go over the head of a modern reader. To my understanding, he got most of those notes right. And he has occasional valuable insights into Jane Austen’s thinking, such as the spot near the end where he points out “what may be the central ideal in Jane Austen, that of love as a force to perfect our characters.” I would have appreciated more of that type of contextualization.
Unfortunately, my overall takeaway from his notes was that of being taken through the text by a high school teacher bent on leading his students to exactly his own personal reading of the text. He should have left out the over-explaining and the foreshadowing.
November 9, 2025
4.5 but closer to 5
my first classic - the romance and tension were chefs kiss (a little too much incest than I would like )
mr Darcy is my dream man. I love Jane and Bingley as well. They barely mentioned, but they were so cut.e
characters that can jump off a cliff- Catherine De Bough, Mr Collins (fuck u), Miss Bingley
I had a annotated version that made it wayyy easier to understand what was happening but I will definitely recommend this as a good classic to get into <333333
my first classic - the romance and tension were chefs kiss (a little too much incest than I would like )
mr Darcy is my dream man. I love Jane and Bingley as well. They barely mentioned, but they were so cut.e
characters that can jump off a cliff- Catherine De Bough, Mr Collins (fuck u), Miss Bingley
I had a annotated version that made it wayyy easier to understand what was happening but I will definitely recommend this as a good classic to get into <333333
Want to read
December 27, 2021Bought this fancy annotated edition so hopefully will get to that soon.
May 3, 2012
When we started this one in class, I thought that Jane Austen books were just a bunch of romantic chick fluff. (No offense intended to the romance fans out there!) As a manly man, I didn't think that there was any way in the world that I would even remotely enjoy it. I'm pleased to report that I was mistaken.
Yes, the main theme of the book is what is commonly referred to as a courtship plot. However, Jane Austen's style is so much more than that. The writing is engaging and very full of social commentary that makes the 1800's literally come alive on the page. The story is filled with very well developed and quirky characters and the story is so much more than just two people going ga-ga over one another and falling head-over-heels in love.
If you haven't read any Jane Austen and enjoy classic literature, I would recommend giving Pride and Prejudice a try. Also, for both new readers and old fans alike, I think that all would highly benefit by reading the fully annotated version published by Anchor Books. It has wonderful insight and illustrations that really fill the reader in on the book itself, Austen and the time in which the book was written. There are a few spoilers in the annotations for the first time reader, but they were few and the rest of the information really added to the quality of my reading experience.
Yes, the main theme of the book is what is commonly referred to as a courtship plot. However, Jane Austen's style is so much more than that. The writing is engaging and very full of social commentary that makes the 1800's literally come alive on the page. The story is filled with very well developed and quirky characters and the story is so much more than just two people going ga-ga over one another and falling head-over-heels in love.
If you haven't read any Jane Austen and enjoy classic literature, I would recommend giving Pride and Prejudice a try. Also, for both new readers and old fans alike, I think that all would highly benefit by reading the fully annotated version published by Anchor Books. It has wonderful insight and illustrations that really fill the reader in on the book itself, Austen and the time in which the book was written. There are a few spoilers in the annotations for the first time reader, but they were few and the rest of the information really added to the quality of my reading experience.
January 9, 2025
(2nd Read) What review can I add to the throngs of praise for Pride and Prejudice? Jane Austen proves that love underlaid by respect, admiration, virtue, self-reflection, and compatibility is truly… yes, I have to: “bewitching”!
December 2, 2014
What better way to start the summer than reading a 740 page annotated version of Pride and Prejudice? Fun, right? I decided to read it in a little over two weeks, hoping to finish it before I left on a family vacation (thankfully, I was successful). In the process, I learned that I am not a Jane Austen fan, this being the first of her novels that I have read in its entirety. While I'm glad that I had an opportunity to read Pride and Prejudice, I wouldn't voluntarily pick up another Jane Austen novel at the moment. Pride and Prejudice should sate any desire to read a classic for quite some time.
For my eleventh grade English class, we were required to purchase and read the annotated edition. I was initially very optimistic about the annotations, hoping that they would facilitate an easier and faster understanding of the text. Unfortunately, as I began reading, I noticed that many of the annotations were unnecessary, or rambled on about completely unrelated topics. While some of the annotations proved to be very helpful, the book could have been significantly shorter in the absence of the extraneous ones, such as images of architecture and carriages that existed at the time.
I found the plot to be very dull, putting me to sleep on more than one occasion (which is definitely saying something because I rarely fall asleep while reading). The events seemed monotonous and nondescript, leading to a dragging and nearly nonexistent plot. The story could have been easily compressed into 5 pages or less.
Austen's style of writing left something to be desired. Her formality made the narrative appear stiff and forced. The characters came across as shallow and lacking depth. They were much too focused on adhering to societal norms to develop a personality and sense of individuality. Consequently, the relationships and romances present throughout the book were equally superficial, often surrounding money and social status. Austen's writing seemed to promote the stereotype that women married solely for money, a generalization that Austen herself refused to succumb to.
While I did not wholeheartedly despise Pride and Prejudice it will not be making my list of all time favorite books. It certainly had its ups and downs, but on a much smaller scale than most novels today. While I wasn't overly fond of the characters, plot, or writing style, it did have a few redeeming qualities, such as a few sharp, witty remarks and the sappy romances that developed. Inevitably, I will be reading more works by Jane Austen at some point in the future and will (hopefully) be able to approach them with an open mind.
Mark Twain had the right idea:
For my eleventh grade English class, we were required to purchase and read the annotated edition. I was initially very optimistic about the annotations, hoping that they would facilitate an easier and faster understanding of the text. Unfortunately, as I began reading, I noticed that many of the annotations were unnecessary, or rambled on about completely unrelated topics. While some of the annotations proved to be very helpful, the book could have been significantly shorter in the absence of the extraneous ones, such as images of architecture and carriages that existed at the time.
I found the plot to be very dull, putting me to sleep on more than one occasion (which is definitely saying something because I rarely fall asleep while reading). The events seemed monotonous and nondescript, leading to a dragging and nearly nonexistent plot. The story could have been easily compressed into 5 pages or less.
Austen's style of writing left something to be desired. Her formality made the narrative appear stiff and forced. The characters came across as shallow and lacking depth. They were much too focused on adhering to societal norms to develop a personality and sense of individuality. Consequently, the relationships and romances present throughout the book were equally superficial, often surrounding money and social status. Austen's writing seemed to promote the stereotype that women married solely for money, a generalization that Austen herself refused to succumb to.
While I did not wholeheartedly despise Pride and Prejudice it will not be making my list of all time favorite books. It certainly had its ups and downs, but on a much smaller scale than most novels today. While I wasn't overly fond of the characters, plot, or writing style, it did have a few redeeming qualities, such as a few sharp, witty remarks and the sappy romances that developed. Inevitably, I will be reading more works by Jane Austen at some point in the future and will (hopefully) be able to approach them with an open mind.
Mark Twain had the right idea:
“I often want to criticize Jane Austen, but her books madden me so that I can’t conceal my frenzy from the reader; and therefore I have to stop every time I begin. Every time I read Pride and Prejudice I want to dig her up and beat her over the skull with her own shin bone!”
February 7, 2017
Quite like this annotation by David M. Shapard, although I would NOT recommend it to someone not familiar with the book -- the annotations are not just on archaic language or historical bits, but touch on authorial technique and plot points and thus are full of spoilers. Shapard's first note to the reader is on that, which I appreciate. The cover has a drawing of Austen's niece Fanny done by Jane's sister Cassandra, numbered with four annotations, which amused me and give the browser a feel for his comments.
There are a few drawings in the text and some sketched maps in the back -- I always appreciate maps! The only gripe I have is that, except for the drawings specifically showing fashions of the time, most of the drawings with people in them have the warning, "the clothing in this picture is from a slightly earlier period," which is kind of annoying. But which only applies to a couple of drawings, so whatever - I would have liked some specifics, though, since some of the ones so labeled the clothes looked Regency to me, and one of the ones without that note looked the least Regency!
Although I've read a couple of books on the Regency era and/or on Jane Austen's books and the Regency Era, Shapard offered information I didn't know, and, for all I gripe about some of the drawings he chose, he also offers an illustration straight out of Gilpin's book on Picturesque Beauty, and a landscape drawing from one of Repton's books, along with some interesting discussion on landscaping ideas of the time that was all new to me and, I thought, quite interesting.
Shapard is not the liveliest Annotator I've ever read, and every great once in a while I think he misses the point entirely, but on the whole he is an informative and interesting companion, and I was happy to have him along. I'm not sure I'd want someone annotating Jane Austen's work to be witty at me -- Jane can carry that load, I reckon.
There are a few drawings in the text and some sketched maps in the back -- I always appreciate maps! The only gripe I have is that, except for the drawings specifically showing fashions of the time, most of the drawings with people in them have the warning, "the clothing in this picture is from a slightly earlier period," which is kind of annoying. But which only applies to a couple of drawings, so whatever - I would have liked some specifics, though, since some of the ones so labeled the clothes looked Regency to me, and one of the ones without that note looked the least Regency!
Although I've read a couple of books on the Regency era and/or on Jane Austen's books and the Regency Era, Shapard offered information I didn't know, and, for all I gripe about some of the drawings he chose, he also offers an illustration straight out of Gilpin's book on Picturesque Beauty, and a landscape drawing from one of Repton's books, along with some interesting discussion on landscaping ideas of the time that was all new to me and, I thought, quite interesting.
Shapard is not the liveliest Annotator I've ever read, and every great once in a while I think he misses the point entirely, but on the whole he is an informative and interesting companion, and I was happy to have him along. I'm not sure I'd want someone annotating Jane Austen's work to be witty at me -- Jane can carry that load, I reckon.
July 15, 2020
favorite quote: "oh, what are men to rocks and mountains?"
hehe.
hehe.
October 17, 2024
4.0 - okay. I get it.
I feel like I’m not going to have much to say that probably hasn’t already been said about this book considering I am the last person in the known universe to read it, but at long last I can finally say I understand. Mr. Darcy is a great love interest (which is so rare nowadays) and he felt like such a standup dude because he for the most part was just a normal human being. Except for when he would just randomly show up for like ten minutes, not say anything, and leave like keep it together my guy. ALSO he’s stronger than me because after that rejected proposal that went Like That I simply would’ve locked myself in a dungeon to never see the light of day again like that was so embarrassing. I also did really enjoy how much he and Elizabeth complemented each other in terms of intellect, and it was entertaining watching both of their affections shift.
I will say though I just did not give a shit about the whole Lydia and Wickham thing that happened at the beginning of Volume III, and it really felt like it’s inclusion just halted the pacing of the story. It did allow Darcy to do something nice for Elizabeth but it was so long that I just kind of wanted to skip ahead because I simply did not care. But hey—that’s credit to the relationship that Austen is able to build that *I* want to get back to the romance at hand. But there were still moments like this that just really halted the pacing for me.
Other Miscellaneous Thoughts:
- I just found Mrs. Bennet and Mr. Bennet equally funny. They’re both ridiculous in opposite ways and both say some of the most out of pocket shit ever.
- The sisterly relationship between Jane and Elizabeth was also really sweet and I enjoyed the scenes of the two of them confiding in each other quite a bit.
- Not enough Bingley.
- Why was Mary even here 😭
I feel like I’m not going to have much to say that probably hasn’t already been said about this book considering I am the last person in the known universe to read it, but at long last I can finally say I understand. Mr. Darcy is a great love interest (which is so rare nowadays) and he felt like such a standup dude because he for the most part was just a normal human being. Except for when he would just randomly show up for like ten minutes, not say anything, and leave like keep it together my guy. ALSO he’s stronger than me because after that rejected proposal that went Like That I simply would’ve locked myself in a dungeon to never see the light of day again like that was so embarrassing. I also did really enjoy how much he and Elizabeth complemented each other in terms of intellect, and it was entertaining watching both of their affections shift.
I will say though I just did not give a shit about the whole Lydia and Wickham thing that happened at the beginning of Volume III, and it really felt like it’s inclusion just halted the pacing of the story. It did allow Darcy to do something nice for Elizabeth but it was so long that I just kind of wanted to skip ahead because I simply did not care. But hey—that’s credit to the relationship that Austen is able to build that *I* want to get back to the romance at hand. But there were still moments like this that just really halted the pacing for me.
Other Miscellaneous Thoughts:
- I just found Mrs. Bennet and Mr. Bennet equally funny. They’re both ridiculous in opposite ways and both say some of the most out of pocket shit ever.
- The sisterly relationship between Jane and Elizabeth was also really sweet and I enjoyed the scenes of the two of them confiding in each other quite a bit.
- Not enough Bingley.
- Why was Mary even here 😭
February 19, 2018
Wonderful story (as everyone in the western world knows). I especially enjoyed this annotated edition by David M. Shaphard. His notes throughout are extremely helpful without making the text longer than it needs to be. Here is a gem to be sure: a prayer Jane Austen wrote that you would not otherwise be privy to in a normal edition of this novel:
"Teach us to understand the sinfulness of our own hearts, and bring to our knowledge every fault of temper and every evil habit in which we have indulged to the discomfort of our fellow-creatures, and the danger of our own souls."
He brings this prayer up in an annotation concerning Elizabeth's discovery that she had not been judging anyone fairly or even really seeing herself in the right light: "Till this moment, I never knew myself."
Jane Austen is a wonderful storyteller and is remarkable at developing characters.
"Teach us to understand the sinfulness of our own hearts, and bring to our knowledge every fault of temper and every evil habit in which we have indulged to the discomfort of our fellow-creatures, and the danger of our own souls."
He brings this prayer up in an annotation concerning Elizabeth's discovery that she had not been judging anyone fairly or even really seeing herself in the right light: "Till this moment, I never knew myself."
Jane Austen is a wonderful storyteller and is remarkable at developing characters.
August 2, 2022
It has taken me a long time to finish this but I finally have. I found the language a little difficult to get my reading mind around but I got into it. My favourite part was with Elizabeth and Lady Catherine de Bourgh when Elizabeth really deals very well to her in refusing to give any information about her relationship with Darcy. Nor is she cowed by her. Yes my favourite part indeed. I read the annotated version so quite a few notes to read as well.
July 31, 2024
“But people themselves alter so much, that there is something new to be observed in them for ever.”
-
“Teach us to understand the sinfulness of our own hearts, and bring to our knowledge every fault of temper and every evil habit in which we have indulged to the discomfort of our fellow-creatures, and the danger of our own souls.”
-
“Teach us to understand the sinfulness of our own hearts, and bring to our knowledge every fault of temper and every evil habit in which we have indulged to the discomfort of our fellow-creatures, and the danger of our own souls.”
April 24, 2024
Will always be one of my favorites. The ending alone makes it so that it will always be high in my regard!
March 22, 2023
you know whenever I heard someone talk about how good pride and prejudice is I was always like, can it really be that good?? But yeah it is that good.
June 25, 2025
rip off of Red White and Royal Blue
November 27, 2017
I would have never thought of reading this book, at least not when I have so many other books on my shelf, but after finding the perfect edition to settle my concerns towards this 19th century classic, as well as the encouragement of a very lovely Austen fan (you know who you are), I've done it! My life was a before and after with this book, as well as the during since it took me over a month to finish. Many, many pages later, I can now proudly declare that I have read Pride and Prejudice.
First of all, I love this copy so, so much. It's filled with annotations. And when I say filled, it basically doubles the length of the book. Yet it is so worth it. All the information from the annotations is, if anything, insightful. I now know much more about the early Victorian era than I can ever dream of knowing. And all of it was super useful while reading the book, making it much more real and understandable to me, a newbie to this kind of literature.
Now as for my feelings for this book, I most certainly liked it. I wouldn't go as far as to say it's my favorite, but it's definitely better than I expected, and the best portrayal of the story, far beyond any book, tv, or movie adaptation. Some parts were slow, like whenever Darcy wasn't around, which was surprisingly often, yet some parts just hooked me. It was a journey, to say the least.
I don't regret it at all to have read it, and I can certainly see myself reading another book by Jane Austen, just farther in the future. I can see how this is so beloved, for the irony, psychology, and stereotype-breaking alone, which I very much appreciated as well. In general, it's just not my usual style. However, I do look very much forward to watching every adaptation I can get my hands on, and take pleasure in the story as a whole in a more condensed way. Glad to now be able to join the conversation. :)
First of all, I love this copy so, so much. It's filled with annotations. And when I say filled, it basically doubles the length of the book. Yet it is so worth it. All the information from the annotations is, if anything, insightful. I now know much more about the early Victorian era than I can ever dream of knowing. And all of it was super useful while reading the book, making it much more real and understandable to me, a newbie to this kind of literature.
Now as for my feelings for this book, I most certainly liked it. I wouldn't go as far as to say it's my favorite, but it's definitely better than I expected, and the best portrayal of the story, far beyond any book, tv, or movie adaptation. Some parts were slow, like whenever Darcy wasn't around, which was surprisingly often, yet some parts just hooked me. It was a journey, to say the least.
I don't regret it at all to have read it, and I can certainly see myself reading another book by Jane Austen, just farther in the future. I can see how this is so beloved, for the irony, psychology, and stereotype-breaking alone, which I very much appreciated as well. In general, it's just not my usual style. However, I do look very much forward to watching every adaptation I can get my hands on, and take pleasure in the story as a whole in a more condensed way. Glad to now be able to join the conversation. :)
June 1, 2009
I don't care what Mark Twain said about her, Jane Austen was a brilliant observer of her times and Pride and Prejudice = pure perfection. I feel I'm unable to add to the glowing reviews this novel has received in the nearly 200 hundred years since it was published, except to say, it is well-deserved acclaim. On a personal note, it was one of the most pleasureable reading experiences I've had and I recommend it to everyone.
Although the novel is five-stars, I would give the Annotations only three-stars, because they were hit-and-miss. I found the explanations of historical content and the citations from Austen's life and letters especially valuable. However, I found that I disagreed with Shapard's literary analysis in some instances; his take on Elizabeth's relationship with Mr. Bennet, for example. The least valuable and most annoying aspect of the Annotated version were the definitions and clarifications throughout. Many were repetitive and unnecessary, examples include definitions for common words and phrasing, such as, "less fine" defined as "less showy or fancy in appearance" and "furniture" defined as "furnishings". I could provide many more examples, but suffice it to say, anyone reading Austen would certainly be able to figure out the implications of any unclear content through Austen's flawless execution of dialogue, references and context connections.
If anyone is considering reading the Annotated version before the novel on its own (as I did), I recommend reading the novel in its pure form first. Since, you'll most likely want to read it again and again, go to the annotated versions later to enhance the Jane Austen experience.
Although the novel is five-stars, I would give the Annotations only three-stars, because they were hit-and-miss. I found the explanations of historical content and the citations from Austen's life and letters especially valuable. However, I found that I disagreed with Shapard's literary analysis in some instances; his take on Elizabeth's relationship with Mr. Bennet, for example. The least valuable and most annoying aspect of the Annotated version were the definitions and clarifications throughout. Many were repetitive and unnecessary, examples include definitions for common words and phrasing, such as, "less fine" defined as "less showy or fancy in appearance" and "furniture" defined as "furnishings". I could provide many more examples, but suffice it to say, anyone reading Austen would certainly be able to figure out the implications of any unclear content through Austen's flawless execution of dialogue, references and context connections.
If anyone is considering reading the Annotated version before the novel on its own (as I did), I recommend reading the novel in its pure form first. Since, you'll most likely want to read it again and again, go to the annotated versions later to enhance the Jane Austen experience.
Read
August 29, 2025Without a doubt one of the most captivating and charming stories that has ever come into print. My enjoyment in it shall only increase with the subsequent rereadings that I look forward to over the course of my life.
Austen’s keen observations and critiques of the social conventions of Regency England, while confined to the particulars of the time, carry a timeless relatability owing to her exploration of human behaviour. Elizabeth is one of my most favourite protagonists that I have ever read, not least because of her wit, honesty, and good nature, but also because of her imperfections. These, like all Austen’s best characters, make her so real, and contribute greatly to the closeness the reader must feel with her.
The development of her and Darcy’s relationship is one of the most enjoyable aspects of the novel. How two proud and headstrong characters quite different in their circumstances in life cannot help but find in each other a strong and true love in each other merely. I love how Austen’s view of romance is so grounded in reason as much as passion, in wit as much as gravity.
“There are few people whom I really love, and still fewer of whom I think well. The more I see of the world, the more am I dissatisfied with it; and every day confirms my belief of the inconsistency of all human characters, and of the little dependence that can be placed on the appearance of merit or sense.”
“I am the happiest creature in the world. Perhaps other people have said so before, but not one with such justice. I am happier even than Jane; she only smiles, I laugh.”
Austen’s keen observations and critiques of the social conventions of Regency England, while confined to the particulars of the time, carry a timeless relatability owing to her exploration of human behaviour. Elizabeth is one of my most favourite protagonists that I have ever read, not least because of her wit, honesty, and good nature, but also because of her imperfections. These, like all Austen’s best characters, make her so real, and contribute greatly to the closeness the reader must feel with her.
The development of her and Darcy’s relationship is one of the most enjoyable aspects of the novel. How two proud and headstrong characters quite different in their circumstances in life cannot help but find in each other a strong and true love in each other merely. I love how Austen’s view of romance is so grounded in reason as much as passion, in wit as much as gravity.
“There are few people whom I really love, and still fewer of whom I think well. The more I see of the world, the more am I dissatisfied with it; and every day confirms my belief of the inconsistency of all human characters, and of the little dependence that can be placed on the appearance of merit or sense.”
“I am the happiest creature in the world. Perhaps other people have said so before, but not one with such justice. I am happier even than Jane; she only smiles, I laugh.”
June 1, 2020
Audio/video recording of Jennifer Ehle (who played Elizabeth Bennett in the 1995 BBC version of the story) reading Pride and Prejudice in various places in and around her home...and car, and with various companions...including her lab mix, Violet. A warm, real, and intimate reading during the difficult time of the COVID 19 stay at home order. Her generosity with her time and talent was a saving grace for me during the early days of the stay at home order and time that I was furloughed from my job. The readings took place from late March 2020 until May 2020 and were originally started and stored on her Instagram page. About one-third of the way through the book, she began to transfer the already recorded readings to her youtube page, where I hope they will live forever. Her voice is very calming...perfect for decompression after a difficult day of work...and news. Mind you...these are not edited productions...as I said earlier...they are REAL...Jennifer, with Violet for company, does much of the reading from her car, and Violet is a constant source of doggo fun. Jennifer is compassionate, and ends every reading with thanks for sheltering with her, and a wish of safety and peace to those who are "working essentially." My heart and soul are extremely grateful to her for her generosity. I don't know how I would have made it through those early days without these recordings.
July 1, 2020
“I cannot fix on the hour, or the spot, or the look or the words, which laid the foundation. It is too long ago. I was in the middle before I knew that I had begun.” -Jane Austen, Pride and Prejudice
This book took me a year and a half to read. To some that may make it a book unworthy of a five star rating. However, I beg to differ. Pride and Prejudice is a book that I hold near and dear to my heart for many reasons. Before reading it I had seen both movie adaptations multiple times (I know, I know. How in the world could I watch the movie before reading the book?) and simply loved the story. I had also had the opportunity to act in the play version of it, which led me to study the story line and characters in depth. The story is rich and full of characters with many different personalities. There's an abundance of comedy in it, while also being balanced with plenty of life applicable truths and heartwarming moments.
One of my favorite things about this story is the family aspect. The Bennett family may be a trifle flawed and perhaps even a bit improper, but Lizzie and Jane show a true loyalness to their family, even when you think they couldn't be more embarrassed by the actions of certain family members.
Pride and Prejudice is a classic book full of timeless truths and characters, and is sure to always be a favorite of mine.
This book took me a year and a half to read. To some that may make it a book unworthy of a five star rating. However, I beg to differ. Pride and Prejudice is a book that I hold near and dear to my heart for many reasons. Before reading it I had seen both movie adaptations multiple times (I know, I know. How in the world could I watch the movie before reading the book?) and simply loved the story. I had also had the opportunity to act in the play version of it, which led me to study the story line and characters in depth. The story is rich and full of characters with many different personalities. There's an abundance of comedy in it, while also being balanced with plenty of life applicable truths and heartwarming moments.
One of my favorite things about this story is the family aspect. The Bennett family may be a trifle flawed and perhaps even a bit improper, but Lizzie and Jane show a true loyalness to their family, even when you think they couldn't be more embarrassed by the actions of certain family members.
Pride and Prejudice is a classic book full of timeless truths and characters, and is sure to always be a favorite of mine.
Displaying 1 - 30 of 324 reviews