Austin is a NYC cop when the Twin Towers were hit on 9/11. He ignores phone calls from his brother, who worked there, as he and his partner respond to the call. Afterward, he is forced into counseling after repeated brutality and intoxication complaints. His therapist, Mercy, does what she can to help but has to recommend permanent desk duty. Years later, they meet again in Baltimore where he serves as a paramedic and she as a high school guidance counselor. As they get to know each other personally, they discover how much they have in common. And how much they are different.
Some people label this as Christian fiction. I would argue that label. Austin considers himself a Christian and a man of faith, a faith that he chose and has leaned on to get him through the years of overcoming alcoholism and PTSD. However, nothing in this novel describes what it means to be a Christian or can be construed as proselytizing. Austin's "Christian" friends encourage him to hold on tight to Mercy, even while knowing she rejects Austin's beliefs. At one point, Mercy spews all the reasons she doesn't believe in God (more on that later), including the 9/11 attacks. Austin's response is that God didn't "allow" that to happen. Without delving too far into theology, that is blatantly wrong. Christian beliefs say that God is omnipotent. While God didn't cause 9/11 to happen, to say He didn't allow it is to say that some things are outside of His control, a direct contradiction with the concept of omnipotence and omniscience.
Mercy describes herself as someone who doesn't believe in God. However, that is not how this story reads. I'm not sure whether this was how the author sees it or if this is based on research and conversations with people who make a similar claim. Mercy has not intellectually rejected the idea of God (can't see Him, can't touch Him, etc). She has a raging fury against Him, believing He has taken away everything and everyone she has cared about. There is a vast difference between believing there is no God and rejecting God because you hate Him. Mercy is willing to blame God when a friend is discovered to have stage 4 cancer but suggests coincidence or a wrong diagnosis when the friend inexplicably goes into remission, even after witnessing the rapid deterioration of health between the tests and the healing.
Mercy and Austin have both suffered great pain and loss. But where Austin chose to cling to God, Mercy has rejected Him. The central question of this novel is - can a person of faith develop an intimate relationship with a person who despises the object of his faith?
It's an excellent question and one worth exploring. The execution of that is uneven here. Most of the questioning is done "off-screen". Austin thinks about going home and getting his thoughts together or praying over it, but we never see him actually do it. After Mercy's rage at God bubbles over, she questions whether they can be together, but they don't have a conversation about it. There is a lot of action, love and care. The relationship is developed nicely. Mercy is a good person. She loves deeply, laughs often, helps everyone she is around, including the high school kids she is responsible for. There is no demonization of her here. She is simply deeply wounded and refuses to believe that a God who let bad things happen is worth her time.
We see life throughout the book from the POV of Austin or Mercy, except for one brief glimpse from Griff. That's like waving a huge sign saying, "SOMETHING BAD IS ABOUT TO HAPPEN". Also, the Kindle version I read was poorly edited, sometimes to the point that I was unsure of what was being said.
As to the ending, it's the only way it could have ended. However, I would have liked it to be a little less abrupt. Again, more showing would have been nice, especially of the conversation (even a part of it) that led to the ending. A sense of where life was going to lead them would have been appreciated as well.
Overall, an interesting story and very readable, but just not executed as well as it could have been.