Not well visualized
Could not finish. Rating: minus 5
At this rewrite, Goodreads only allows to see only 2 of the 200 reviews and one is mine, which is more than I usually can see. More significantly Goodreads responded to none of my queries and their harassment intensified. 🤔 The final catalyst for my rewrite project was discovering that Goodreads had masked commenter ID's on all my reviews (with the sole exception of Powers of the Earth). 🤔 putting up with very nasty comments was one thing but having the site "protect" the member names of these people crossed every line. I have not received an acknowledgement of my queries about these actions in more than two years. 🤔
I soon after closed my reviews to comment and removed my lurkers but one. Goodreads will not allow me to remove a Dr Susan Hamilton (Maths professor at University of Tennessee ?) and of course did not respond to queries regarding this last either. 🤔🤔 She posted nothing over more than two years since her friend request. She then failed to remove me after four requests. 🤔. It makes no sense, if hers is not a stolen identity. I have good qualities but am just not that interesting a person. 😁
If you find the above acceptable, please do not read this or any other of my reviews. Thank you.
It seems that when you write a scathing review of "a poorly written salute to a January 6, 2021 hero", a lowly (rogue, of course) Goodreads tech suddenly decides that a member being a communist is a bad thing. Quite a surprise that. 🤗🤗
For additional Goodreads, see my review of "Stowaway", a sad attempt at space adventure or Powers of the Earth (a poorly written salute to a January 6, 2021 hero) and the comments of a Claes Rees Jr/cgr710 (a self-identified NeoNazi and US patriot).
To Claes Rees Jr/cgr710
Don't be a numpty. Be a smarty. Come and join the Communist Party.
I wonder sometimes what besides huge gold transfers motivates US patriots (Tucker Carlson, Claes Rees Jr and US Republican legislators, for example) to so vocally support Putin or his Russia, even after Putin has threatened their country with nuclear war. I think that it might be the prospect of replicating the forced relocation of at least two million Ukrainian women and children to Siberia. In any case.
Today Kherson! Tomorrow Crimea! GLORY TO UKRAINE !!! and GLORY TO THE HEROES !!!
I put the book away at the at the 53% mark. I never thought that I would say this of a book of science fiction but in this book there was too much science. There was the usual (for low end work) big problem of inadequate and/or deficient world building.
"From this great sin doth all other harm arise." That must be a quote from a 16th century theologian or philosopher but if not, it should be.
The background universe is neither described nor explained. The sole attempt to create that background is to repeat the mantra that defines the circumstances of the ship's crew. The mission is doomed to failure. The agency or government (unknown) that funded the journey expects them to die. The expert opinion of engineers and scientists is that the crew will die on the trip. The press it seems expects that the crew will not survive the mission (which is not described). The crew whose reasons for joining the crew are not given, expect that this will be a one way trip.
This is the very description of lack of world building. Still this example is superior to most Low Effort, Minimal Effort or No Effort current US science fiction. Why a writer undertakes to pen a fiction that requires that they of necessity must imagine an entire world and for which they must then write a complete background from the ground up and then not write that world is a puzzle to me.
In writing my book, I have so far spent most of my time building a world. I think that I have gone full Sanderson, sometimes. I am creating a planetary society, a humanity wide general tech level allowing for differences between that of various multinational blocs. I have almost perfected my technology framework and ship design for one faction at least. Then there is the need for the range of major values that define the difference between blocs. I have begun the series (I hope) plot in a general way.
I can not conceive of doing this in any other manner. Now I at least have an incomplete context in which to place the major characters that I have in mind. It requires a commitment of research and modeling time but Frank Herbert spent seven years (if I remember correctly) writing "Dune". I do not expect to write an epic that engrossing but with some effort, I may finish something entertaining and relatively well written.
These writers all either lack imagination or work ethic and most probably both. Their disregard for the reader is on sad display. Their respect for the genre or writing in general is obviously absent. The publishers and editors encourage the attitudes in approving the work, then buying their books. Ruin the genre that demands the most of its readers in imagination, then attack critical thinking. Definitely sounds like the plan of an evil Neoliberal financial cabal, celebrating the end of history. Dramatic, I know. Forgive me. Still it would work in one of these books or perhaps a well conceived examination of the supports required to maintain a Neoliberal narrative. British citizens voted by a slender margin for Brexit and only began an online search for the definition of Brexit the day after the vote. I think that proves the cabal premise has a real world precedent, so do not judge me too harshly for my ill timed flight of fancy.
Back to the book. The writer's "background" is not foreshadowing. It should not even be the background. The reader probably is curious about the mission parameters, which might at least explain the rushed nature of the whole expedition. The stakes if explained would make the book more entertaining. It would be nice to know something about the state of the planet that launched them. The organization would be even better.
Having repeated that every one in the solar system expects the crew to die, reminding the reader that the 1969 Moon mission was accomplished only with luck and duct tape was unneeded. While It is true, that was overkill.
The first 30 to 35% of the book was comprised almost solely of engineering descriptions, materials science, orbital mechanics.
The characters and dialogue really aren't. They seldom speak and only the musings of the main character, give any insight into the rest of the cast. I would say that the mission and its supposed urgency is contrived, if so had a clue whay the mission was.
The background is too skimpy to disguise the pointlessness of rushing the trip. The creation of both new power plants and exploration machines is conducted while the mission itself is being designed. The ship design and creation is not explained. Who built it and where was not answered. It simply appears in orbit. Before the manned ship is sent, an unmanned supply ship is launched but it isn't mentioned by the characters until about page 200 or so. The point of launching an unmanned ship is never made and the possibility of it failing is not even discussed. This is the supply source without which the crew of the manned ship will not be able to return to Earth. Bad planning or bad plotting?
With that background the story consists of two parts. There are the hundreds of paragraphs dedicated to describing the engineering requirements, materials and power requirements, aspects of the ship's design, the suits the crew use to minimize the damage from weightlessness on their health and every nook and cranny of their not overly large spaceship. If that's the case, why not include actual ship specs, including length, width and height. The actual dimensions of the internal spaces would make it easier to understand the crew environment.
The main character provides the POV which would be fine but all he does is brood and demonstrate a limited awareness of the people around him. There are scenes where the systems programmer demonstrates savant like maths skill and the same in maintaining the engineering of his spacecraft. He does this while, having no background in either. His detachment is so great that he observes his fellow crew but doesn't understand their very ordinary behaviors. Autistic?
About a third of the way through the story, a female astronaut announces that she is pregnant. The crew then votes whether she should terminate the pregnancy or further strain their limited life support resources. The biggest issue for the crew seems to be the lack of baby diapers. There is even a baby shower of sorts. The main character spends days wrapping his head around the discovery that the mother and her boyfriend had been having sex for months in their shared cabin. The main character is obviously either intellectually or emotionally impaired but it's not clear which.
The rest of the story is a stream of equipment failures, faulty mission planning, emergencies that anyone might have foreseen and so on. That the writer expects that a consortium would spend 80 billion dollars on such an ill conceived project is very optimistic but I don't see how that would be possible.
As a feasibility study of a multi-year intrasystem journey, it is a failure. He needed to include real financial, technical and political constraints. These would be spelled out as part of his argument, whether for or against it. The crew would only exist to demonstrate the ability to provide life support and other necessities in any ship design. Adding unplanned pregnancies is just immature writing and explains the lack of character development.
He would have done better to do one or the other. Write a well researched feasibility study on the limits of near future launches to other planets or write a novel about the crew who is tasked with the trip and the process by which the crew and ship come into being. He has done neither. It wasn't so much hard science fiction as hard to read thin science in search of a fictional framework.
I have over the last two years lost much of my interest in current science fiction print. I generally reread the better writers or rely on Netflix and other streaming services for the rest of my science fiction. All of the streaming services have stories that are better written than Low Effort US science fiction print. Some of the film and shows are very,very good and the rest are usually at least interesting.
About two years ago, I began searching YouTube for science fiction channels. I was pleasantly surprised to find quite a few and other special interest channels besides. I had not known that there were book channels on YouTube and it was a welcome discovery.
The book channels really cover everything related to the world of books from redecorating of the library through book recommendations and reading challenges. These channels host communities of readers who are varied in tastes and interests, curious and love all bookish things. I think that is obviously the opposite to whatever Goodreads are (besides being toxic and left to low level techs willing to break laws in support of things like pro-slavery comments).
I recommend that you visit some of the book channels for any reader. I have listed some below.
A last note as regards Goodreads. I suggest minimizing information in your profile and periodically removing lurkers. They may not cause you problems unless you are doing something right but why take chances. Try to remember that the same "rogue" tech or two are responsible for answering any complaints or queries and need not acknowledge your message. 🤔
They can also affect your Kindle service as I discovered. With good internet my Amazon services would go blank after posting negative comments some reviews for hours. 🤔 Guess who handles the complaint? After I mentioned my odd service cutouts in several reviews, they ended magically and never returned.
That was a system activity that can not be covered up and is really illegal. 😐 Despite movies, very few things can be removed from the system log with no trace. I do not think that Amazon will do a system log review without a court order, so take a screen shot and save it. Please protect yourself as if on a potentially hostile site. Enough of them.
YouTube has essay and documentary channels but also pointed me to educational video sites via advertisements. I began with Curiosity Stream/Nebula at a cost of about $15 USD for a yearly subscription. I think that any of them is worth a look.
My picks of the moment.
Alt Shift X, Ancient Geographics, Truth to Power, Larry and Paul, Sarah Z, MIT Video Productions, Tom Nicholas, Tibees, Ben and Emily, A Cup of Nicole, MANDY, Utopian Broadcast, Violet Orlandi, Sabine Hossenfelder, Boat Time.
Some of my favorite YouTube channels are.
Second Thought, Beau of the fifth column, Ben and Emily, Munecat, Some More News, Owen Jones, Eleanor Morton, Renegade Cut, Lindsay Ellis, Novara Media, Tara Mooknee, The Juice Media, The Great War, A Life of Lit, Dead Good Books, The Narrowboat Pirate, 2Cellos, Cruising Alba, Lady of the Library, Emmie, Tibees, History Marche, What Vivi did next, AstronautX, Philosophy Tube, Owen Jones, Denys Davydov, Boat Time, Tulia, Merphy Napier, With Olivia, Camper Vibe, Steam Punk, Swell Entertainment, Brittany the Bibliophile, Noelle Gallagher, Isaac Arthur, Karolina Zebrowska, Sabine Hossenfelder, Celtica, Lady knight the Brave, Lilly's expat life, BrandonF, TIKHistory, Double Down News, Alice Cappelle, Alize, I'm Rosa, Prime of Midlife, Jessica Gagnon, France 24, Double Down News, Sarah Z, Kitty G, Adult Wednesday Addams, Neringa Rekaslute, Chloe Stafler, Books with Chloe, Dr Becky, Jack in the Books, Bookleo, Overly Sarcastic Productions, Kathy's Flog in France, Book Odyssey, Thirdworld Booknerd, Lily Alexander, Rebecca Watson, Zoe Baker, Three Arrows, Max Joseph, Anton Petrov, Kelly loves Physics and History, Military History Visualized, Joe Scott, IzzzYzzz, Rowan Ellis, Invicta, Spacedock, Jessie Gender, Then & Now, Beautifully Bookish Bethany, Mythic Concepts, Quinn's Ideas, Jaxon the Critic, Told in Stone, The Templin Institute, The Piano Boat, The Welsh Viking, Books and Quills, Task and Purpose, Dakota Warren, Pro Robotics, A Cup of Nicole, Alexa Donne, Zoe Bee, Enby Reads, Bookslike Whoa, Noah Samsen, The Radical Reviewer, Spacedock, Storyworldling, Writing with Jenna Moreci, Juliette Wade, Christy Anne Jones, Atun Shei, Cursed by Design, The Great War, Between the Wars, World War Two, Diane Callahan Quotidian Writer, Vlad Vexler, Kalyn Abridged, Jill Bearup, We're in Hell, Depressed Russian, WION, A Different Bias, DUST, Mala Armia Janosika, The Angry Astronaut, The Shades of Orange, UA Courage, Art by Annamarie, The Leftist Cooks, Steve Shives, Violet Orlandi, Ship Happens, May Moon Narrowboat, Northern Narrowboaters, All Shorts.
I wish you a bright morning, a gorgeous afternoon, a refreshing evening, a wonderful night and may we all keep learning.
Gentlemen, we did it! Can you not smell the individual liberty and freedom in the air?
Hamilton, Toast at the 1783 Christmas Gala of the Association of English North American Slave Owners and Slave Traders