I read this as part of my exploration of “the great cynics” at the turn of the millennium, the others being Ambrose Bierce and Jonathan Swift. Mencken was the one I knew the least about going in, and I started with this “second” Chrestomathy because it happened to be easily found at Shakespeare & Co.
Mencken will not disappoint anyone looking for cynical writing, and so far as I can tell the “second” Chrestomathy is as good a place to start as any. “Chrestomathy” was a word Mencken appears to have invented for the first anthology of his work. This one was never published in his lifetime, although most of the work for a followup volume had been prepared and was found in his collected writings not long after his death. The editor has organized them thematically and written an extensive introduction for the book, but otherwise allows Mencken to speak for himself.
Few people will agree with all of Mencken’s opinions, but many educated people will agree with some of his sentiments against stupidity in American culture. More importantly, whether you agree or not, it is a pleasure to enjoy the wit and skill with which he demolishes sacred cows and comments on various aspects of contemporary life. He loves Chekov and Nietzsche, but hates Sinclair Lewis and Robert Louis Stevenson. He prizes education but hates teachers. He mocks Christianity and especially the Salvation Army, but despises religious intolerance with equal vehemence. He rarely finds praiseworthy respect in women, but criticizes men who try to do without their company. Although he did revise many of these essays to remove specific references to contemporary figures and ephemeral issues, a familiarity with the history of the early twentieth century will help to contextualize many of the essays.
In short, this book is worth the time for people interested in Mencken, and probably outside the grasp of those who are not.