Once again I find myself trying to review a book whose content I am still struggling to digest. My struggles with the content are due to both the nature of the subject matter and also with my own
limitations. The 'authors', The Cowherds, are a group of 10 academics who have, working collectively and singly, to produce 14 articles on the Buddhist concept of the two truths, nominally, 'conventional truth' and 'ultimate truth'. While the authors have worked together to produce a cohesive work, it is clear that they are not always in agreement. Further, it is clear that the Buddhist philosophers with whom they are dealing are often far from being in agreement. The resulting book is both enlightening and troubling, as any good philosophy book tends to be. I thoroughly enjoyed the read, while admitting to having spent much time reading and rereading the same paragraphs over and over.
The book is highly recommended for anyone who puzzles over basic concepts of truth/reality and our perception of such. Now, I have twice written longer reviews on my own fascination with the book and the topic AND I have twice had my efforts disappear from the screen, leaving only the paragraph above. I suspect that the message for me, perhaps from GR, is that no one is likely to read my ramblings on truth, whether ultimate or conventional. I shall accept that for now. It's 2:00 a.m. I shall try again after reading The Two Truths Debate: Tsongkhapa and Gorampa on the Middle Way by Sonam Thakchoe.