Several major drawbacks, which prevent it from earning a higher score... 1) the author's writing style is very elementary, part of which is a consequence of the subject material. He bounces between major charcters very frequently within chapters, which puts events out of chronological order. Some events (like the death of Stonewall Jackson) are covered several times. It's almost as if he had forgotten he wrote about them earlier. Some chapters seem very rushed, perhaps out of a lack of source material. Some chapters seem to be included just to continue with the narative of the Civil War, even though the six main charcters are not involved in any way. Other battles, like Cedar Mountain, take up several chapters. 2) This book is essentially a summary of action on the eastern front of the Civil War which focuses on six officers who happened to go to school together. There are only a few occasions where the author makes any effort to discuss their interaction with each other. So, basically, this book is like many others except in its framing. 3) Even though this book is clearly a summary work of eastern front battles, it is clearly intended for readers who are familiar with the events and people in the war. For example, he makes references to generals without mentioning which side they are on... a fact that will leave many less-knowledgable readers confused. 4) Even though I am pretty familiar with the events of the Civil War, his fast pace and superficial coverage makes some of the events and actions very confusing to understand. A simple fix would have been to include maps, but there are none.
Despite these drawbacks, I found the book easy to read and enjoyable. It doesn't shine any new light on the war and I feel it doesn't cover the bonds of brotherhood as well as it could have, but I still don't regret reading it.