The British assault on Breed's Hill and the burning of Charlestown were the first major battles of the American Revolution; after the events at Boston there was no turning back. This detailed text by Brendan Morrissey explores the opposing commanders and forces involved, whilst describing how the sparks at Lexington and Concord ignited the smouldering resentment of the Colonists into the flame of a rebellion. Colonist militia were pitted against British Redcoats in a series of struggles which led the British to evacuate Boston and to George Washington taking command of the fledgling American army.
Brendan Morrissey trained as a lawyer before working as a PR consultant and writer in the defense industry, principally with British Aerospace. He has a long-standing interest in military affairs and Anglo–American relations. He is married and lives in Surrey, UK.
“Their flag to April's breeze unfurled, Here once the embattled farmers stood, And fired the shot heard round the world. Down the dark stream which seaward creeps.”
Love this book so much💃🏼 I’ve studied this story for so long and no matter how many times I read about it or see it talked about in museums, it still grabs my attention. Every. Single. Time.
A concise account of the American Revolution's first battles in Massachusetts. Morrissey brings a British perspective that is a good antidote to American myths. Like most Brits, he does not give much credit to the ideology or "radicalism" of the Revolution, instead seeing it as a contest over self-government that turned violent due to British bureaucratic blunders and the machinations of a few colonials of ill repute. As an introduction to the war's opening phase it does suffice.
Another excellent Campaign series title from Osprey.
This work gives more of a British perspective than some of the flag waving patriotic American texts but that is never a bad thing. The text is clear and concise. His writing style is highly readable and his descriptions of the actions and the characters involved are involving and much to be praised.
He does not shy from highlighting both the political ineptitude of a British government nor the less than sterling patriotism of some colonists. The idea that people burned their own buildings down around Concord in an insurance scam and then attempted to blame the Redcoats for it, is just one of the odd nuggets to come out of the text Nobody is really castigated, General Gage probably comes off worst but he is implied to have been put in a no win situation surrounded by downright hostile civilians who actively spied on him and either attacked, bribed or stole from his troops.
His analysis that (especially at Lexington and Concord) the militias were actually more experienced and effective than the regular professionals is interesting and worth more consideration. He argues that they contained many French & Indian War veterans as well as men who had fought in the Ponitac War whereas the British Regiments had not seen fighting for at least a decade and in some cases far longer. He suggests that the carnage at Breed's Hill was partly down to inexperience and lack of higher level quality. The Colonists not really having any command between Company captain and Brigade General whist the British were constantly having to create new plans as mutiple same level commanders with no clear chain of command impeded each other.
Despite all of this, my favourite part of this book is right at the end. He quotes from an 1812 interviw of a Concord Colonial veteran by an American journalist. Even in print you can imagine the bemused look on the old man's face and the growing concern of the journalist when this tranpired "Do you still remember the oppression that made you take up arms?" "Oppression? Can''t really say I felt any of that" "What about stamp duty?" "Don't think I ever had one. Certainly never paid a penny for one." "How about the tax on tea?" "Never drank the stuff" And so he went on, demolishing shibboleths of the revolution until the interviewer asked what he did actually fight for. "We had always governed ourselves. Damned if we were going to let that change."
In a detailed look at the battles that began the American War of Independence, Morrissey gives a clear and interesting look at the participants and the field involved. It's a very well-written account of the most important battles in world history, and keeps one's interest instead of just being a dull history lesson.
Virtually all the history of the American Revolution one is taught in the elementary grades and in high school in this country emphasizes the “heroic” aspects of the struggle. All the textbook accounts, too, are written very much from the American viewpoint. It’s therefore very interesting to read a history of the beginnings of the war, from Concord to the siege of Boston, written by a British expert and giving equal time to the British point of view. Morrissey is not an academic historian but is a recognized military history expert who has also written texts on Saratoga, Quebec, and Yorktown. He begins here with the immediate background: Parliament’s colonial policies, politics in New England, and Gage’s dilemma in trying to prevent the conflict many could see coming. He examines the personalities and backgrounds of the senior military figures on both sides, and the frequent friction between the prim New Englanders and the unmannered frontier riflemen. Then he goes into detail in examining the nature of the soldiers on both sides -- infantry, cavalry, artillery, and irregulars. The battle maps are very detailed, as are the order of battle lists, and the color plates depicting the uniforms and weapons of units on both sides are up to Osprey’s standard -- though there aren’t as many as usual, and they’re scattered through the text. An altogether excellent treatment of the key series of events in U.S. history that not enough people understand, or even really know about.
While I liked some of this author's other writing for Osprey, at almost thirty years on since publication, this is a book that has become dated, particularly in terms of Morrissey's bibliography. Ten years ago I picked it up used (and very cheaply!), probably at a library book sale, because I had questions about nuts-and-bolts military details in regards to another work on 'Bunker Hill,' Paul Lockhart's "The Whites of Their Eyes." On the basis of such things as orders of battle, it still might have some utility, besides privileging a British perspective on events. I suspect that most readers are now going to pick up Nathaniel Philbrick's "Bunker Hill" as their go-to book on the battle.
One of better Campaign volumes with brief, but fact-filled and readable overview of the campaign, covering actions at Concord and Lexington, major engagement at Breed's Hill and subsequent siege. That final part of the campaign is disapointingly short; perhaps the main weakness of this volume.
As always, the narrative is supported by relevant contemporary graphic material, couple of uniform plates and absolutely georgous maps.
a great classroom resource for history classes, talkes about the events before and after the struggle for boston, it has pictures, documents, drawings and detailed information