Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

Academy Awards®: The Complete Unofficial History -- Revised and Up-to-date

Rate this book
Updated to include the 2014 Academy Awards, this is the definitive guide to 86 years of the Oscars, including every nominee and winner in every category, plus red carpet highlights, unforgettable photographs, and insider information from onstage and behind the scenes.

The Academy Awards invites us to share in the celebration of 86 years of best actors, actresses, directors, cinematographers, costume designers, and more, plus the greatest films in movie-making history. All of the winners and the losers of Hollywood's prestigious award ceremony are covered here in detail, together with all of the glamour and gossip that is the Oscars®.

Written by film experts Jim Piazza and Gail Kinn, who are sought out by the media every year for their insider knowledge of movies and Hollywood, The Academy Awards is both a handy reference and a detailed history of the annual event. Organized by year, beginning with the very first awards given in 1927, The Academy Awards presents in each chapter a complete and fun-to-read overview of the ceremony, including highlights of the most memorable moments (and outfits!) of the evening. Piazza and Kinn also provide details and little-known facts about award winners for best picture, best actor and actress, best supporting actor and actress, and honorary awards, plus a complete list of nominees in every category.

Packed with more than 500 photographs from the ceremonies and red carpet, as well as stills from the movies themselves, this unauthorized book delivers what fans want all the facts, enhanced by juicy commentary and pictures galore.

368 pages, Paperback

First published August 7, 2011

Loading...
Loading...

About the author

Gail Kinn

10 books

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
11 (28%)
4 stars
20 (51%)
3 stars
7 (17%)
2 stars
0 (0%)
1 star
1 (2%)
Displaying 1 - 3 of 3 reviews
Profile Image for Paul Bryant.
2,449 reviews13.3k followers
October 11, 2016
This is about as good as a history of the Oscars could be. Each year has a summary of the comedy highlights of the ceremony (oh the boycotts and the suppressed rage) and then half a page on the main Oscars with sidebars featuring:
- essential firsts : for instance Cabaret won the most Oscars (8) without winning Best Picture
- Sins of Omission - movies and performances overlooked by the idiots at the Academy
- Role Reversals : Tom Hanks in American Beauty?? Harrison Ford in Big ???)
- Always a Bridesmaid, Never a Bride : Peter O'Toole, who received his first nomination for Best Actor 44 years ago, set a record for the most years between nominations in that category... - he's had 8 nominations and no wins, ah well.
- Unmentionables, which is just a lot of vicious gossip and funny quotes - “My wife doesn’t get jealous,” revealed Jeremy irons “when she sees me in sex scenes she says to herself ‘Oh he is only acting, I know he can’t last that long’”

HAVE YOU NOTICED HOW MANY TIMES THEY DISH OUT OSCARS TO ACTORS PLAYING PHYSICALLY OR MENTALLY DISABLED PEOPLE?

These are just from recent years:

Jamie Foxx in Ray
Russell Crowe in A Beautiful Mind
Angelina Jolie in Girl interrupted
Geoffrey Rush in Shine
Nicholas Cage in Leaving Las Vegas
Holly Hunter in The Piano
Al pacino in Scent of a Woman
Daniel Day-Lewis in My Left Foot
Dustin Hoffman in Rain Man
Marlee Matlin in Children of a Lesser God
And the list goes on

HOOKERS

On Page 287 there is a handy list of Oscar winning hookers – Hollywood just loves them

Anne Baxter in The Razor’s Edge
Claire Trevor in Key Largo
Donna Reed in From Here to Eternity
Jo van Fleet in East of Eden
Elizabeth Taylor in Butterfield 8
Shirley Jones in Elmer Gantry
Jane Fonda in Klute
Mira Sorvino in Mighty Aphrodite
Not to mention Julia Roberts in Pretty Woman who was nominated but did not win

RIGHT OSCAR, WRONG FILM

Then I could list the many Oscars given to actors for the wrong film – this is where they were trying to make up for previous omissions. Such as John Wayne in True Grit. I mean, John Wayne in The Searchers, maybe, but never in True Grit, beating Dustin Hoffman in Midnight Cowboy! As if.



BEST PICTURE OSCARS : BLIMEY, WHAT WERE THEY THINKING OF?

The Academy very often goes for the big billowy family friendly feature with scintillating posture and top notch cultural value spritzed all over it like spray on tan. Here are some Best Pictures I would like to REMOVE and the ones I would like them to be replaced by since 1965 :

1965 : The Sound of Music Repulsion
1973 : The Sting Badlands
1976: Rocky Taxi Driver
1980 : Ordinary People Raging Bull
1982 : Gandhi ET
1985 : Out of Africa Brazil
1988: Rain man Mississippi Burning
1989 : Driving Miss Daisy Born on the Fourth of July
1994 : Forrest gump Pulp Fiction
1995 : Braveheart Babe the Gallant Pig
2000: Gladiator You can Count on Me
2005 : Crash Brokeback Mountain
2010: The King’s Speech True Grit

So, this book is recommended for all film fans.



"Oh my God. Oh my God. I'm sorry. This moment is so much bigger than me."
Profile Image for Tina Rae.
1,029 reviews
April 11, 2016
So while watching the Oscars this year and screaming when some of my favorites showed up as presenters/winners, it suddenly occurred to me that I will never, ever have the opportunity to see some of my other favorites, the greats from the 30's/40's/50's as presenters/winners. Which led me to wonder about how the Oscars even started and past winners and things like that. Basically I was just curious about how the Oscars had started and thus I found this book.

I did deeply enjoy reading this book and I learned a lot from it. There were so many favorites that I didn't know had won Oscars?? And I especially enjoyed reading about the antics of the very earliest ceremonies. I really took a lot from this book and it definitely served the purpose I wanted. I can now monologue about *exactly* how the Oscars were formed and have a very firm opinion (about which I will rant) about how the system was initially so corrupt and there were so many winners that didn't deserve to win. I can also talk about my favorite cinnamon rolls and their amazing speeches (please see Jimmy Stewart and Ginger Rogers) and also the two greatest queens of cinema: Bette Davis and Katharine Hepburn. .... So basically talking to me about movies is probably a thing you never want to do because I could go on for DAYS (years?????)

Anyway, those are the good parts of this book. And those are probably all the praises I will sing for it. While I learned a lot from it and enjoyed that, this book was honestly a nightmare to read. It was riddled with typos (some of which were so frightfully annoying) and it left quite a lot out. It was a designer's nightmare (this was probably my own personal problem but I was literally glaring at pages going I COULD'VE DESIGNED THIS BETTER. THESE BOXES ARE UNEVEN AND THE SHADOWS ARE WRONG.) But eventually it bugged me a lot???? (If you are, in fact, normal and not an advertising major and not constantly plagued the design deficiencies of others, this probably won't both you at all so ignore me.)

But I think the biggest thing that bugged me was the reliance on reviews from critics. I, personally, hate critics and never read their opinions nor let them decide for me whether or not to see a film. Because I can form my own opinions and I don't need you forcing yours onto me??? And half the time I don't agree with critics anyway??? (And this book is especially filled with Pauline Kael comments which made me want to throw the book across the room every single time she was quoted whether the review was good or bad. I honestly almost gave this whole book one star for quoting her so much.) I would have MUCH RATHER read descriptions of the films themselves or more about the actors than critics reviews. That's not what I'm here for. The sidebars were full of little tidbits about the actors. Why couldn't those have been in the actor descriptions rather than stupid critic reviews. /rant

Well, anyway, by the time I was nearing the end (which went through 2010) I was just ready to be done. I was really only interested in everything pre-80's (since I was far more familiar with everything that came after) so finishing this book was honestly a chore. I considered not reading past the 80s but eventually did anyway. Because by that time I was too close not to finish? But it's definitely a book I will not be rereading.

So while I will always be grateful for the history this book taught me (and which I will definitely be repeating often) it's also one that was difficult to get through and I will never be revisiting. And probably not be recommending to anyone else (if you have a few hours free I will seriously just tell you everything I learned from this book so you don't have to suffer my fate). I almost hope there's another book like this one out there somewhere that is better organized so I could recommend it instead.

In the future, can the Academy just write one instead?? Or just create a channel of old Academy Awards broadcasts? Or even just release them on Netflix or something? I would watch them all the time. *sends pleas out into the universe in hopes they eventually make it to the right person*
Profile Image for Nova.
56 reviews
May 12, 2016
Rekomendasi bagus untuk para pecinta atau pelaku dunia film. Sayang cuma sampai 2010.
Displaying 1 - 3 of 3 reviews