I am amazed at the vitriolic reactions on the Internet against Colin Forbes, who, for me, has been one of the most successful thriller writers of the last few decades. As far as I can see here, the biggest criticism that Forbes has faced from most of the readers is that his characters are not developed properly. While I would concede that to an extent, I would say, in his defence, that Forbes probably sacrificed character development for a smooth flow in his stories. I think this is the most important part in a thriller novel. I just love the way Forbes' novels pick up pace. He doesn't waste time in telling people what his characters look like or how they dress, because he moves straight to the point. He would rather concentrate on the surroundings. And that, I think, is something which is very unique to him.
His books are well researched. One funny criticism I noticed is that Tweed doesn't like mobile phones but still ends up using them! How hillarious! I know people who don't carry a cellphone even these days but do borrow them to make a call when required. Folks, don't put down a writer just for the sake of it.
I think Forbes' earlier novels, those not featuring Tweed, were much better. But that's not to stay that the Tweeed ones are trash! He wrote much better than most people and I have throughly enoyed his books. Among my favorites are The Stone Leopard,The Fury and The Leader and the Damned.