I came to this after deciding that ‘The Deadmans Pedal’ was my novel of 2012, pretty much.
To Alan Warner’s credit, it’s one brave task to take on – a novel set overwhelmingly and claustrophobically in an airport, with a large cast of characters that are doomed to be marked down for not being likeable by the ‘likeability’ seeking Richard & Judy reader. To be clear, the dominant character is an irritating twat.
My main criticism though centres around character interaction and voice. Granted, this is a ‘what happened next?’ from an earlier coming-of-age novel, ‘The Sopranos’ (but it’s a standalone too) – so perhaps those relationships have been forged and the work has been done there. But coming to the group for the first time here, I really didn’t believe in the idea that this ragtag band would actually still regroup in this way or retain its loyalties and connections. ‘Manda’ is an exaggeratedly stupid, insufferable Alpha Female and I just didn’t believe that the two plus old friends would still be humouring her and giving her centre stage, having entered their twenties and left town. She’s precisely the kind of person they’d have waved goodbye to years earlier. Her small town ignorance– which a number of the other characters also display – doesn’t really feel credible for a character in an age of TV and mass communication. So I found myself quite often thinking ‘She would know that’; ‘she would have known what that is’; ‘there’s no way she’d call Enrique Iglesias ‘Reaky Glaciers’ by accident’. The studied naivety just didn’t work for me. Or add up. On the one hand we’re to imagine she’s canny, heart-of-gold and folk-smart; on the other she’s a fucking idiot with the brains of an eight year old.
Beyond her, the rest of the cast struggled to come through for me – and six of them is, to be fair, a huge task for a writer to develop and push into interaction. I didn’t really believe in the Ava character; that she would have surrendered herself to this; the Jewish-French-English-Rose-Oxford-Junkie assembly. I wanted her to come to life more and to get an understanding of her rapport with Finn (the reason behind her joining the parade). I also didn’t think she’d have been embraced, in time, the way she was.
The other big flaw, I think, is voice, which didn’t really serve character. At times we have imagery that just doesn’t belong here. A business centre in a hotel is described as looking something like ‘a room of voting booths for an election in a developing world country’ (or something smart like that) – but whose observation is that? Not these girls’. At other times, where Warner was describing the airport interior, I found myself going “Alan, we know what the lifts look like in airports. You don’t have to notice and describe the mechanism of the lifts”. The characters certainly wouldn’t.
The ending (I won’t give it away) is also a bit set-piece-y and for-the-sake of it too, and doesn’t really reveal anything, other than that this novel is set around this date. A la 'On the wireless, Mr Chamberlain was heard saying "I believe it is peace for our time"'.
So, a really brave concept to take on - but not especially rewarding in its execution. It’s the kind of thing that might perhaps get more interesting as decades pass, as it’s a snapshot of current/recent consumer culture and lifestyle (the fashion, the food, the mores). Pardon the pun though - it never really took off.