A wonderful guy named George Ross taught my Sunday school class when I was probably around the age of 14. One Sunday he presented a game of sorts where we were all given a scenario. In it, we couldn’t communicate with the other members of the class. If we silently cooperated and trusted each other, everyone in the group would share equally in the benefit, whereas the first person to act selfishly would claim the entire reward, while everyone else would get zero. It wasn’t easy to trust each other. What were my fellow class members going to do? Would my ego be left high and dry if someone else grabbed it all and won?
As the game went on, and the imaginary rewards he described got sweeter and sweeter, I began to think it would be quite clever to be the one to break ranks and take it all, which is what I eventually did. At first I felt a bit euphoric about it, but when everyone’s disappointment became clear my adolescent glee turned to internal shame. It was all appropriately magnified by good brother Ross of course, who let us all know that he often used the game as a demonstration at his job, and that in all the years he had presented it, never had someone in any group of participants NOT done what I had done to the detriment of the group. He wasn’t surprised by what I had done at all. Someone, like me, had always done the selfish thing. I hadn’t been so cute and clever after all. In the book Federation, I learned that this type of game has a name of sorts. It’s called the Prisoner’s Dilemma.
Federation is a clever book in the Star Trek genre that combines timelines and events from two famous crews from the Enterprise, one under the command of James T. Kirk, and the other under Captain Jean Luc Picard (they’re separated by about 80 years). Anyways, the two ships get into a dangerous situation where they can see each other but can’t communicate. At least one ship can see that if they take advantage of a gravitational wave, their ship escapes doom at the expense of the other one, but if they trust the other captain to recognize and execute a mutually beneficial maneuver, independent of one another, they both likely escape.
Kirk explains the prisoner’s dilemma to McCoy this way, “it’s an old problem in strategy, Bones. In this case, the first prisoner to act selfishly goes free while the other remains in prison. But if we both cooperate, we both go free. The trick is, we can’t communicate with each other. So neither prisoner knows what the other is thinking”. To which Spock replies, “Logic dictates that the first player to act selfishly will always fare better”.
At the time of this review, the age of Covid-19, we’re all prisoners of sorts. What will we do? What should I do? I know what I shouldn’t do. Thank you, George Ross.
***
One other thing that struck me while reading this book was in a discussion about friends and enemies. During the time of Kirk, Klingons and Romulans were bitter enemies, with no end in sight. Later, in the time of Picard, Klingons were no longer enemies, but Romulans still were. In a verbal exchange between a Romulan and Captain Picard, Picard expresses his hope for eventual peace with the Romulans, to which the Romulan says, “the Federation will never conquer my people”. Very calmly Picard replies, “the Federation does not conquer, Commander. It invites”. This exchange led me to think about effective persuasion. No matter how righteous ones cause, it seems true persuasion is never achieved through force.