I read about half of the articles and essays gathered in this anthology, and here is what I thought about each one:
Introduction by James Quandt
A solid intro into Bresson, the literature written about him, his influences, methodology, and ways of studying his cinema, which also serves as an overview of the book.
Journal d’un cure de campagne and the Stylistics of Robert Bresson by Bazin
The classic text on Bresson, that for the first time articulated many of the terms and concepts are now taken for granted in Bresson criticism. It’s as much about Bresson and Journal as it is about the subject of adapting films from literary sources.
The Universes of Robert Bresson by Amedee Ayfre
Another classic study of Bresson’s cinema. Certain much-debated concepts (or dichotomies, rather) like transcendence and immanence, loneliness and communication and abstraction v. realism are explained fabulously.
Spiritual Style in the Films of Robert Bresson by Susan Sontag
The last of the three essays which James Quandt calls the three classic texts on Bresson in the introduction: texts that have informed subsequent critical approaches towards his films more than any other. Sontag’s prose is simple and straightforward, she focuses on the development of The Bresson Style, and pays special attention to Bresson’s emphatic use of form. She also makes interesting links and comparisons between Bresson with Brech and Cocteau.
The Rhetoric of Robert Bresson by P. Adams Sitney
Extensive profile of Bresson’s filmography from Journal to Une Femme, that assumes different analytical approaches for each film-most conspicuously a philologic one. While it doesn’t initially strike you as the most exciting article in the book, it certainly is one of the most important. The section devoted to Balthazar is the best (and longest) part of the essay and is one of the deftest and solid instances of close analysis in the whole book. It really enlightened me about many of the films formal intricacies.
Affaires publiques by Rosenbaum
A short review that makes some interesting connections between this early short and the rest of Bresson’s oeuvre.
The Exchange: Narration and Style in Les Anges du peche by Bordwell
A detailed analysis of style and narration of the film, that specifically tracks where the film deviates and when it conforms to the common stylistic tropes of Occupation-era French films, as well as comparing and contrasting the film to Bresson’s later films.
On Robert Bresson’s Film Les Anges du peche by Barthes
A very brief appraisal of the film, in which Barthes admires different aspects of the film while maintaining the difficulty of making a film of this kind.
Les Dames du Bois de Boulogne by Tony Pipolo
An extensive and revealing analysis, paying special attention to shot transitions (fades and dissolves) as well as motifs present throughout the film.
Film Form/Voice-Over: Diary of a Country Priest by Nick Browne
An almost incomprehensible account of voice-over narration’s function, in relation to other parts of the film such as decoupage etc. as well as other-cinematic or otherwise-texts’ use of voice-over narration.
Bresson’s Un Condamne a mort: The Semiotics of Grace by Allen Thiher
At times confusing and somewhat difficult to understand, it’s a look at the semantics and theology of the film, which fails to properly address (or at least say anything genuinely interesting about) either.
Pickpocket-Revisited, Again by Mark Rappaport
An accessible collection of mostly interesting wonderings and ideas, very similar in style to Rappaport’s video essays that focuses on sexuality and intertextual comparisons with other films.
“The Sum of a Mysterious Operation”: Bresson’s Joan of Arc by Richard Suchenski
This is really more of a brief history of Joan of Arc’s cinematic treatments rather than one about Bresson’s film. While the emphasis is mainly on the Dreyer, Bresson, and Rivette adaptations, others are also touched on.
“D’ou cela vient-il?”:Notes on three films by Robert Bresson by Keith Reader
Looks at Lacanian psychoanalysis combined with a Christian lens, counting the similarities between the two seemingly disparate methods, and then applying them to a reading of three of Bresson’s films (Diary, Pickpocket, and Mouchette). Due to frequent reference to other texts (Lacan, Pascal, Christian theology etc.), it’s a bit of a difficult read if you are not familiar with the mentioned theories and ideas.
Terror and Utopia of Form-Addicted to Truth: A Story About Robert Bresson’s Au hasard Balthazar by Michael Haneke
An excellent and passionate piece, that describes the philosophy (and indeed necessity) of Bresson’s “model” theory of acting (and its purest distillation in Balthazar the donkey) better than any film critic or scholar has. It also provides illuminating context (from critical theory to literature) for the importance and uniqueness of Bresson and his cinema (oops, sorry Monsieur Bresson, I meant “cinematographe”) as well as the significance and unity of form and content and their indistinguishability in Bresson’s films.
Sound as Symbol in Mouchette by Lindley Hanlon
Informed study of the functions of sound as a means to create an ambiance of entrapment, as an emblem for character dispositions, the use of music, in both descriptive and more technical analyses.
Bresson, Vermeer by Jean-Claude Rousseau
A vehement and poetic ode to Bresson and Vermeer which compares their unique styles and aesthetics, mostly by relying on Une femme douce.
The Sheen of Armour, the Whinnies of Horses: Sparse Parametric Style in Lancelot du Lac by Kristin Thompson
A monumental close analysis that studies Bresson’s use parametric form (motifs, themes, and variations etc.) in great detail, both as a means of narration as well as (and more prominently) autonomous stylistic and aesthetic entities that have their own logic and progression, separate from that of the narrative. She reads Bresson (along with the likes of Ozu and Tati) as at once a narrative filmmaker and a structuralist.
Bresson a Stylist by Harun Farocki
Farocki counts the crucial elements of Bresson’s cinema that form the basis of his film: avoidance of long and establishing shots, use of close-ups, frontal camera positions etc.
The Organ and the Vacuum Cleaner by Serge Daney
Ostensibly about Le diable probablement, but uses the film only as the starting point for a series of (rather odd) musings about sound in cinema.
A Stranger's Posture: Notes on Bresson’s Late Films by Kent Jones
A personal story, rather a scholarly analysis, one that mostly focuses on the political and societal position of Bresson’s later films.
L’Argent by Alberto Moravia
One page comparison between Tolstoy story and Bresson’s adaptation of it, and mainly on the two auteurs worldviews, especially those about “good” and “evil.”
L’Argent by Dardenne brothers
Another single page tribute to L’Argent, in which the Dardennes talk about the diabolical role of money in Bresson’s film, and briefly mention how they have been influenced by him in the way they use money in their films.
Led by the Scarlet Pleats: Bresson’s L’Argent by Hasumi
A somewhat peculiar and unique essay by the renowned Japanese critic that is essentially about hands, and objects that they interact with: money, doors, desks etc., with special emphasis on the role and function of money.
Question by Interview Jean-Luc Godard and Michel Delahaye
A lengthy interview from Cahiers du cinema 1966, after the release of Balthazar, between Bresson and Godard (Delahaye is also there, but there are very few questions from him). Most of the length of the interview is dedicated to Bresson’s use of actors and theories on acting, and there are some interesting back and forths between the two legendary filmmakers.