What do you think?
Rate this book
9/11 on Trial: The World Trade Center Collapse
Fact vs. Fiction about 9/11 What if the “official” version of events on 9/11 could be disproven solely on the basis of physics, mathematical equations, scientific formulas, physical evidence, and expert testimony – without the use of a single “conspiracy theory”? Might this dramatically alter your perspective on 9-11 and the war and “security” policies that are based on it? That is exactly how “9-11 on Trial” disproves the government’s official story – which it happens to be using to suspend our normal, peaceful, constitutional American way of life. Did you know that never before nor since 9/11 has a steel building ever collapsed due to fire? Yet on 9-11, three of them supposedly did just that in seven hours – with WTC 7 not even being hit by an airliner. All three steel-frame buildings hit the ground at free-fall speed – physically impossible unless all resistance beneath was blown away by controlled demolition. Even the government admitted in their final FEMA report that “The heat produced by burning jet fuel does not by itself appear to have been sufficient to initiate the structural collapse.” How to explain the pools of molten steel which were found bubbling 70 feet beneath the towers five weeks after 9-11? A temperature of 5,182 F is needed to melt steel – yet the estimated heat of the fires in the WTC was only between 300 F and 500 F, and jet fuel can only reach a maximum temperature of 1,517 F – in ideal conditions. 9/11 on Trial is the final answer to obfuscation, intimidation and disinformation, because it is clarity itself.
- GenresPolitics
192 pages, Paperback
First published February 4, 2005
73 people want to read
About the author
Victor Thorn
59 books56 followersPseudonym of Scott Robert Makufka, Operator of the website WingTV and writer on conspiracies. Thorn was a Holocaust-denier and blamed Israel and the Jews for the death of Kennedy and 9-11. In his three books against the Clintons he cites proof of Bill Clinton's drug-running and attributes four deaths of her critics to Hillary Clinton. Thorn also published the writings of other anti-Semites and conspiracy theorists.
Thorn died of a gunshot wound, which some sources say was not suicide but the work of either Hillary Clinton or Mossad.
Thorn died of a gunshot wound, which some sources say was not suicide but the work of either Hillary Clinton or Mossad.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 3 of 3 reviews
July 27, 2009
ARGH! Steel and concrete buildings cannot be burnt down by jet fuel (which is nothing more then kerosine and cannot melt steel which melts at over 1000 F) that burned off within the first few seconds, buildings don't fall down into their own shadow when glanced at the top, and THOSE BUILDINGS WHERE DROPPED. read this book. end of story.
July 26, 2024
A MOCK "TRIAL" IN WHICH THE "OFFICIAL" CLAIMS ABOUT 9/11 ARE SCRUTINIZED
"Victor Thorn" is a pen name for the author of numerous "conspiracy"-related (and sometimes anti-Zionist) books, such as 'New World Order Assassins,' 'The Holocaust Hoax Exposed: Debunking the 20th Century's Biggest Lie,' 'The New World Order Exposed,' etc.
This 2005 book is written as if a prosecuting attorney was cross-examining a variety of witnesses. He explains in his prefatory "Notes On the Text" that the "answers" in the book are nearly always comprised of direct quotations from a variety of sources. (Somewhat confusingly, the sources are listed numerically in the back of the book---and are often simply taken verbatim from some website---and no page numbers are given for books, so that it is difficult to readily assess the reliability of a given source, or to check a quotation.)
Nevertheless, this approach is relatively effective; it conveys the impression of being like a fictional "trial" in which the "official story" claims for 9/11 are critically scrutinized.
The book would be more persuasive, however, if it dealt with potential objections, or allowed itself to comment on the "testimony" quoted; e.g., it cites seismographic data of "jolts" recorded BEFORE the planes struck the Twin Towers as evidence for "controlled demolitions"---but the towers obviously did not collapse until hours after these "blasts," so what was their effect supposed to be? For another example, it cites a book which asserts, "In order to pulverize concrete into powder, explosives must be used. Concrete will not turn into powder simply by falling down onto another piece of concrete," but it gives no technical/scientific reference for this assertion.
"Victor Thorn" is a pen name for the author of numerous "conspiracy"-related (and sometimes anti-Zionist) books, such as 'New World Order Assassins,' 'The Holocaust Hoax Exposed: Debunking the 20th Century's Biggest Lie,' 'The New World Order Exposed,' etc.
This 2005 book is written as if a prosecuting attorney was cross-examining a variety of witnesses. He explains in his prefatory "Notes On the Text" that the "answers" in the book are nearly always comprised of direct quotations from a variety of sources. (Somewhat confusingly, the sources are listed numerically in the back of the book---and are often simply taken verbatim from some website---and no page numbers are given for books, so that it is difficult to readily assess the reliability of a given source, or to check a quotation.)
Nevertheless, this approach is relatively effective; it conveys the impression of being like a fictional "trial" in which the "official story" claims for 9/11 are critically scrutinized.
The book would be more persuasive, however, if it dealt with potential objections, or allowed itself to comment on the "testimony" quoted; e.g., it cites seismographic data of "jolts" recorded BEFORE the planes struck the Twin Towers as evidence for "controlled demolitions"---but the towers obviously did not collapse until hours after these "blasts," so what was their effect supposed to be? For another example, it cites a book which asserts, "In order to pulverize concrete into powder, explosives must be used. Concrete will not turn into powder simply by falling down onto another piece of concrete," but it gives no technical/scientific reference for this assertion.
Displaying 1 - 3 of 3 reviews