Disclaimer: I am a colleague of Scott Nicholson. I have professionally edited several of his books outside of this genre. I approached this book as a reader exclusively, and this is an independent personal review/analysis based upon my perspective as a reader who enjoys this particular genre. It is based upon my subjective enjoyment of the content, and is as objective as possible regarding quality of content.
Book Description:
Twelve-year-old Freeman is en route to Wendell, a group home for problematic, orphaned children. He has a history of truancy trailing him along with a traumatic early childhood.
The property that Wendell occupies is over 50 years old, and was originally a mental hospital with a dark history. Horrors untold and secrets not revealed are hidden deep within.
The Trust: Without morals, bound by ultimate conceit, this secret group procures and uses children as a means to an end for their own cause. While fostering paranormal traits in these children, they unknowingly release the horrors of the past that taint THE HOME.
Review:
Experience Southern religious dogma, ESP, paranormal activity, mad scientists, and a world beyond that is left to your imagination. Venture through a world of science versus religion as each is taken to the extreme. Face chilling inhumanity buried deep in the past as the victims seek vengeance, intent on destroying everything in their wake. Be thrilled, be horrified, and be entertained. A definite buy and read.
Analysis
Pros:
THE HOME is a fast, enjoyable read. Fans of Scott Nicholson will not be disappointed. A definite page-turner. Lots of action, creep factor, and paranormal activity. Nicholson gives the perfect amount of detail to create the structure, and allows the reader to create the rest of the detail in his or her imagination.
As an example: In the beginning, Nicholson does a superb job describing the Wendell properly. He is not overly descriptive, allowing perfect narrative structure in the most simple non-obtrusive form. It is beautiful piece of narrative--one of the best descriptive narratives I have read in a long time.
Cons:
Although Nicholson ties up almost all of the loose ends in the denouement, I would have preferred it to have been fleshed out a bit more. The ending felt abrupt and hasty. Additionally, I believe one particular character could have been tied up a little bit more clearly (to write about him/her would be a spoiler.)
Some of the characters could have been developed more fully, providing a richer experience. The trade-off would have been a longer novel. These days, readers expect novels no longer than 300 or so pages, which limits authors considerably. In this case, however, I believe that this novel would have been better off having been expanded. The downside to this would have been more scenes in different points of view, but I don't think the book would have suffered.
Last note:
I think that this book/concept would make a great trilogy. The second in the series would allow for a flesh-out of the characters that didn't get a chance to speak in this novel. There are other children that need an opportunity to share their stories as well, and the story isn't concluded yet.
This book is optioned for a movie. It is my contention that it would make an incredible movie due to the digital effects available today, coupled with the creative content that Nicholson has written. This is a core reason why I believe a trilogy is necessary. The story must conclude; all loose ends must be tied up. We must have closure on the Group, the children, and the adults.