What do you think?
Rate this book


344 pages, Hardcover
First published January 1, 2011
... the ground that each historian tries to cover is often broad, so errors creep in wherever one relies on common knowledge and trusts other writers' words. It takes much work to authenticate some common hearsay; it takes more work to falsify, and some conjectures are too seductive to resist..The author proves the validity of meticulous and thorough research, finding the real sources, and confirming or condemning the use of alternative sources as an easier way of constructing a theory, book, or belief.
... Consciously or not, writers inflate tales to sell books. As rightly noted by Jürgen Neffe, another good biographer of Einstein, “speculations evolve into anecdotes that are then proliferated in book-length studies.”
... Many writers echo traditional stories rather than dig up documentary facts, interpreting bits of evidence to match conjectures rather than to test them.
... This book analyzes several famous topics in the history of science: the lore of Pythagoras, the Copernican revolution, the alchemical quest for the Philosophers' Stone, Darwin's path to evolution, the mysteries of electricity, Einstein's relativity, and the rise of eugenics.
... Legends about Galileo have propagated partly because people were willing to parrot the claims of specialists, believing authority, rather than evidence.
The solution is to trust evidence instead of experts. If someone claims something, even if it is Galileo writing about Aristotle, or Newton writing about Galileo, or even the latest, best biographer writing about Einstein, we should abstain from simply believing what they say, unless they cite the specific evidence to which they refer.The reasons for the various churches to reject or accept the different theories of the old scholars are discussed in some detail. Enough to bring a new understanding for the less scholarly reader who just want to learn more, without completing a dissertation on the subject. The clashes between the different groups: Catholics, Lutherans, Protestants. They all interpreted the Bible differently and they all were willing to kill to protect their interests. Scientists lost their lives in apposing religious leaders.