Read this as part of a Crisis Counseling class I took from Trinity Evangelical Divinity School extension in Madison, WI. It was one of two texts we used. The other was Norman Wright’s Crisis and Trauma Counseling.
Faced with using either Kristi Kanel’s text or that of H. N. Wright, I would choose Kanel’s book and would recommend it as the better to those interested and those uninterested in how spirituality and counseling connect. In this text, the positive side of crises is given much more of a central role, as is seen starting on page 3 with the Chinese definition of crisis as danger and opportunity. Another excellent example of this is on page 176, “…The crisis worker can be most effective when the person is truly in crisis. A crisis condition is needed to confront clients successfully about the negative impact the drug is having on their functioning.” On the book’s discussion of battering, it is shown how the painful time after the explosive stage in the battering cycle can provide the momentary clarity need for the abused to see their situation for the what it is – unjust and inhumane. While the possibility of good coming from crisis is broached in Crisis & Trauma Counseling (p. 130), this is the only time Wright really considers the concept. For these reasons, I find Kanel’s writing in this area more conducive to the idea that God can use situations of pain and suffering to his ultimate glory than I do Wright’s (who sometimes seems more comfortable avoiding suffering or pain and its effects rather than facing them).
Other positive aspects of this text are:
· The varying forms the text takes: case studies, time-lines, role-playing exercises, and informational quizzes (I just wish we could have done the role-playing as an in-class activity).
· Recognizing the groundwork that psychology has laid for crisis counseling (p. 18-25).
· Accepting that there are varying perspectives on key issues in crisis counseling, for example, “Is de-institutionalization working or not? (p. 130)”
The book does have its faults as well. For one, it may attempt to cover too much with too little room. Some of the issues dealt with, like cross-cultural counseling, are vital, yet may fit better with a text that is not centered upon crisis counseling. Also, even considering the fact that this is a secular text, it seems as though spirituality was not given the time and space it should have. Kanel spent a chapter on death and dying yet did not link person’s worries on this topic to differing conceptions of what happens to someone after death, or how different religions mourn or celebrate death for those that are still living.