What do you think?
Rate this book


272 pages, Hardcover
First published April 1, 1998
The Deobandis represent the extreme of such attempts to regulate personal behaviour, having issued a quarter of a million fatw on the minutae of everyday life since the beginning of the [21st] century. There is eyewitness testimony to children, chained to their lecterns, rocking back and forth as they learn by rote a Koran written not in Pashtun but in Arabic.No wonder a survey of 160 women reported that :
[...]
[T]aliban misogyny went so beyond what is normally intended by that word that it qualified as a kind of 'gynaeophobia', one so broad that the merest sight of a stockinged foot or varnished finger was taken as a seductive invitation to personal damnation[...Women] had to be covered, closeted and, where necessary, beaten to prevent more sin from being spewed into society. The Taliban penalty for women showing their faces in public was set by the Office for the Propagation of Virtue and the Prevention of Vice, a religious police established in Kabul to enforce such restrictions, at 29 lashes.
[...].
Teachers had been one of the soft targets of the jihad, with some 2,000 assasinated and 15,000 forced to abandon the profession out of fear for their lives. In Nangarhar, one commander admitted to burning down the local primary school and slaughtering its nine teachers, because 'that was were the communists were trained'
[...]
'Even a woman has trouble in examining a woman in Afghanistan,' a doctor with Médecins du Monde had explained in Herat over a year earlier. 'There are still women doctors, but for how long one doesn't know. If the access of females to medical studies is forbidden, there will no longer be any women doctors to assure a service of gynecology or obstetrics' [...] Afghan women stood a greater chance of dying in childbirth than anyone outside Sierra Leone; and they gave birth on average nine times in their lives.
97 per cent showed symptoms of depression and 73 per cent reported a decline in their physical health status.The titles of some of these chapters clearly reflect the author's stance, especially when the reader realizes that many of them are ironic if not downright sarcastic: “Warriors of God”, “Mission to Cleanse”, “Burning down the House”, “Ignoble Grave”.
Recent conflicts in Nagorno-Karabakh, Abkhazia, Turkish Kurdistan and Chechnya are all linked by a single golden theme: each represented a distinct, tactical move, crucial at the time, in determining which power would ultimately become master of the pipelines which, sometime in this century, will transport the oil and gas from the Caspian Basin to an energy-avid world.There are also fascinating chapters on illegal drug cultivation and trafficking in Afghanistan and its neighbouring states and the unbelievable levels of corruption. The author also attempts to uncover the true extent of Osama bin-Lada's involvement in terrorism while living in Afghanistan and Pakistan's, Iran's, Saudi Arabia's, the US and Russia role in sponsoring, at the very least, terrorist training camps.
[...]
After the fall of the Soviet empire in 1991, Turkey had been seduced into believing that its ties of shared culture and language would provide the template of a new imperial dimension to its Central Asian policy[...] While Turkey worked to deepen its links with a dream hinterland stretching from Azerbaijan to Xinjiang province in China, Iran had also seen its opportunity. As a revolutionary Shia state, Iran had less to commend it in Central Asia, where a lapsed Sunnism was universal after three generations of Soviet rule. Turkey's brash capitalism and its constitutional commitment to secularism held more appeal to Karimov and Saparmyat Niyazov, the president of Turkmenistan, who combined the Soviet predilection for cults of personality with a wide-eyed hankering for expensive construction projects. Analysts said Ankara was forwarding US strategy by providing a role model in tune with Central Asia's transition from the Soviet to the modern, but it was Tehran, a wealthier and better connected player in the region, which actually made the running.
[...]
To outside observers, the ensuing conflict [in Afghanistan] came increasingly to resemble the eruption of ancient hatreds, whether of race or sect, supercharged by Cold War weaponry and the logic of the post-Soviet vacuum in Central Asia.
Widows were doubly victimized under the Taliban. Not only were they denied paid employment, like other Afghan women, but they lost access to food aid, which under the new government, had to be collected by male relatives [...] Few [UN and NGO] agencies bothered to make their projects for widows credible... The bakery and sewing schemes supported by World Food Programme, UNICEF and UNOCHA did nothing to instill self-sufficiency or business skills among their illiterate beneficiaries who were granted a 'salary' of relief food, but below market prices for their bread or quilts.As you struggle through the book with an increasing sense of shock and horror, and if you take a step back and a deep breath, you begin to grasp the enormity of what it means to truly attempt to enforce the UN Bill of Human Rights on a planetary scale, the manifold ways in which 'self-interest' as a basis for capitalism and governments can run seriously amuck in a society lacking adequate checks and balances and the depth of despair that can drive a big enough fraction of a society into the arms of a regime capable of inflicting such levels of psychological and physical violence. And you thank God you did not have to live in Afghanistan, at the very least between 1990 and 2000.
[...]
An evaluation report [identified] three classic UN responses to the restrictions introduced by the Taliban. One was 'adaptive', and entailed continuing to operate within the dominant political values, and a second was 'defeatist', whereby all decisions were deferred until the political situation had altered. There was little to choose between them. The third, termed 'challenging', treated every violation of gender equality as a violation of human rights, to which the only coherent response was a suspension of social aid.
[...]
Secretary-General Boutros Boutros-Ghali, three days later, confirmed the UN's commitment to Afghanistan, but only under the terms of its charter, which states that UN activities must be 'for all without distinction, as to race, sex, language or religion' [...] In the first week of October, the UNCR suspended seven Kabul programmes affecting 8,000 people [...] Oxfam reacted by closing all programs, including the multi-million Logar water supply project which, when completed, would have supplied clean, running water to half the capital's households[...] In November, Save the Children (US), which had closed land-mine awareness programmes when girls were barred from schools, reported a 300 per cent increase in casualties.
[...]
Michael Scott, manager of the UN agency Habitat's urban regeneration programme, summarised the communication breakdown: 'The degree of cognitive dissonance and communicative distance we can see and feel now with these new potential partners [the Taliban] is unlike anything we have experienced with previous Afghan factions, authorities or regimes.' He added: 'Neither in the new order does there appear to be any notion of accountability; the real authorities are to this day a nameless shura, who mediate the will of the Supreme Authority.'