“This has been my story, my own memoir, with a heavy dose of redneck social commentary,” writes Bageant on his final page (310), and with fondness for the book I put it down.
While reading it, however, I sometimes grew tired of the socialist tangents the author would go off on, his tone too angry, railing against a government and corporate conspiracy against the hard-working little man. Before the industrial revolution of World War II the latter was self-sustaining on his own little piece of land, in what Bageant calls a family-based economy (“farm families and the small communities that served them in a symbiotic relationship,” 92) where one didn’t make money, but made a living (i.e. the food and products one needed); after the 1950s or 60s this gave way to a commodity and consumer-based economy, resulting in a poorly educated underclass and consequent debt, poverty, unemployment. ("that [post world-war II] rural generation, equipped more often than not with less than a high school education, strong backs, and the ability to endure the toil accompanying farm life, were losers in a new race they weren’t equipped for. They lost in the competition for the perceived conveniences of industrial, urban society." 198)
The reason why there isn’t a large uprising, is a lack of insight in one’s own plight: "Heartland America was and still is a strange place, where poor education and purposefully managed information vacuums prevent social understanding. Things, good or bad, just sort of happen to you, and a passivity reigns for working-class people, as if all things larger than their families are beyond their control, so they believe that Jesus, providence, or plain luck govern their fate,” Bageant thinks (145), and observed exceptions to the affluent Middle-Class ideal are often racial, effectively dividing rather than connecting the enormous underclass: “These underclass-challenger versions [of history], usually ethnic or racial, seldom include the fact that they share their underclass status with a legion of whites several times their own combined number. Beyond that, the challenger versions of national memory include the same seeded basis as the accepted version, such as that all white Anglo-Americans have steadily gained in quality of life throughout our history, as they marched arm in arm toward the American Dream of affluence" (265).
Rainbow Pie is, I think, at its best when it's actually a memoir, with family relations in its focus, a description of dropping out of school, or when a teenage Bageant dresses up to ask out the prettiest girl in town ("she lived in a whitewashed stucco house" and "One block and a coat of whitewash was the difference between Grosse Point and Hell's Kitchen" 231), or the shame of his dad when they are unable to afford the $100 remaining after a grant and scholarship, to send his son to an art institute to further develop his son's obvious skills (240). The following social commentary on the lack of means for advancement, as a direct result of these circumstances is cradled much more in Bageant’s memoir style and a much more pleasant read.
On pages 280 and 281 he conveys how his ancestral home, Over Home, burns down, with family heirlooms and large chunks of the family’s history, even if, in Bageant’s own words, its true history had been lost years before: “By 1960, Over Home was over with as a family lifestyle. Year after year of relentless pressure from an escalating transactional-wealth society had eradicated the ancient farm life (275).” Yet to me, the portrayal of the fire is where the Bageant story comes most alive, where he captures the reader, where I become most engaged what is being told.
Another instance is, when he plainly observes how his Grandmother died a diabetic at 63, as did his dad, and "I am diabetic and this week I turned sixty-three" (285). He was to survive the age of 63, but barely: a year after he wrote his ominous words, he would be diagnosed with cancer, and he would die in 2011, before turning 65.