Time Binds is a powerful argument that temporal and sexual dissonance are intertwined, and that the writing of history can be both embodied and erotic. Challenging queer theory’s recent emphasis on loss and trauma, Elizabeth Freeman foregrounds bodily pleasure in the experience and representation of time as she interprets an eclectic archive of queer literature, film, video, and art. She examines work by visual artists who emerged in a commodified, “postfeminist,” and “postgay” world. Yet they do not fully accept the dissipation of political and critical power implied by the idea that various political and social battles have been won and are now consigned to the past. By privileging temporal gaps and narrative detours in their work, these artists suggest ways of putting the past into meaningful, transformative relation with the present. Such “queer asynchronies” provide opportunities for rethinking historical consciousness in erotic terms, thereby countering the methods of traditional and Marxist historiography. Central to Freeman’s argument are the concepts of chrononormativity, the use of time to organize individual human bodies toward maximum productivity; temporal drag, the visceral pull of the past on the supposedly revolutionary present; and erotohistoriography, the conscious use of the body as a channel for and means of understanding the past. Time Binds emphasizes the critique of temporality and history as crucial to queer politics.
I read this book to polish up a writing sample before sending it out as a part of my graduate school applications. Throughout the book, Freeman develops a theory of erotohistoriography. To put it simply (a grossly repetitive phrase used by Freeman herself, attesting to the convuluted nature of much of this book), the concept of erotohistoriography explains how queer writers and artists make sense of a collective past through a focus on corporeal pleasure, thus bringing ideas of temporality into conversation with the body and centering its erotic pleasure as the point of contact for understanding histories that run counter to our heteronormative understanding of time. Without going too deep into a theoretical hole, this theory helps provide a new theoretical framework to parallel the traditionally future-focused — pain and shame-focused in the case of queer historiography — rhetoric of queer theory.
Aaaand I've finally finished this (prompted by a course) - it's excellent. One of the best, perhaps the best, book I've read on queer temporalities. Her elegant, but also frequently humorous and playful prose, often streamlines (in a good way) the theoretical rigor of her work, making it accessible and very portable. Her concept of "temporal drag" is particularly generative, as is the somewhat more unwieldy "erotohistoriography." I don't expect to unlink this from my brain any time soon.
an interesting intervention in the notion of queer temporality, but it wasn't really a fun read for me. she spends a few dozen pages analyzing a little-known lesbian film, which made me fall asleep...
One of the few critics to give Isaac Julien's "The Attendant" a good critical consideration. Also, a necessary addition to our thinking about alternate temporalities and queerness.
In Time Binds, Elizabeth Freeman posits that much of queer life is a kind of temporal drag. That through consciously enacting gender or sexuality and through the jagged seams between these ideas, time itself warps. She writes: “By ‘time binds,’ I mean…that naked flesh is bound into socially meaningful embodiment through temporal regulation: binding is what turns mere existence into a form of mastery in a process I’ll refer to as chrononormativity. Pointing out that time itself has been bound to capitalism through an insistence on productivity, Freeman suggests queer joy and queer eroticism are ways of moving through oppression. Ending with an exploration of the time-bending powers of S&M culture, she illuminates how typical S&M scenarios can be read through the multiple lenses of time, race, power, and eroticism. ⠀
it attempts to explore compelling themes within queer studies, but its dense and overly academic prose makes it challenging for a broader audience to engage. The book's disjointed organization and lack of concrete examples further impede understanding and connection with readers. While it delves into significant subject matter, its abstract analysis and assumption of prior knowledge may alienate those seeking a more accessible introduction to the topic. As a result, "Time Binds" falls short of its potential to deliver a truly impactful and engaging exploration of queer temporalities and histories.
interesting, but hard to understand, like most queer theory. She should learn how to write about film, since she seems intent on analyzing film and video, but she has not bothered to learn the terminology, which makes her seem a little dense, not to mention pretentious. Even first-year film students know the difference between a splice and an edit.
Erotohistoriography, Prosthetic Memories, and of course Drag Time, were the concepts I will remember from this iconic book. I will probably have to read it over to completely understand it, or at least reread those few concepts and chapters. Like others noted, the writing can be circular and convoluted, but it still got me inspired, and I still enjoyed reading it (slowly).
3.5/3.75: at times too dense and the readings, whilst thorough and always convincing, left me desperate to find something else to connect to - though I am but a fledgling academic and lacking proper reading behind me! overall, generative, and will be super useful for my queer marxism diss.
really fascinating. i would recommend this to anyone who is interested in queer temporalities and queer a-formal stylings especially in the 90s/early 2000s (ACT up era)
Elizabeth Freeman's work on queer temporality is incredibly fascinating regarding how different histories become embodied through certain acts and fashion, and also how chrononormativity produces straight temporalities that seek to bind queer histories. My chief complaint with the book is that I feel like the bulk of its deep ideas come out in the introduction and preface, making it so a person may not necessarily need to read the rest in order to have a decent understanding of the book's central subject. Nonetheless it is a fascinating read.
Time Binds is a powerful argument that temporal and sexual dissonance are intertwined, and that the writing of history can be both embodied and erotic. Challenging queer theory’s recent emphasis on loss and trauma, Elizabeth Freeman foregrounds bodily pleasure in the experience and representation of time as she interprets an eclectic archive of queer literature, film, video, and art.
"Unbinding time and/from history means recognizing how erotic relations and the bodily acts that sustain them gum up the works of the normative structures we call family and nation, gender, race, class, and sexual identity, by changing tempos, by remixing memory and desire, by recapturing excess."