Edward Muir’s Ritual in Early Modern Europe describes the Reformation as a process of distanciation from the material world, relocating the locus of the sacred from the materially accessible to the inwardly apprehensible. With a shift in focus from real presence to represented presence, and from direct encounter to description (the exposition of truth), ritual became more a matter of cognitive apprehension than visceral experience. Reformers seeking clarity and certainty “replaced the mass with the sermon” (184) and tended to intellectualize faith. The core ritual question correspondingly shifted from “what emotions does it evoke?” to “what does it mean?” (158)
The strength of Muir’s argument is its clarity, and while Muir gravitates towards the sensational, lurid and macabre, his vignettes give a rich texture to his argument. I do wonder, however, whether these extreme stories give an accurate description of what late medieval life was actually like. Nevertheless, Muir avoids what Charles Taylor called “the subtraction story”: a relatively straight line from the numinous medieval world to the disenchanted world of modernity via the Protestant Reformation. Instead, he attempts to show how the Protestant relationship with ritual was not so much a matter of loss as of transformation.