(I'm reviewing this because I received it for free through Goodreads' First Reads program.)
The one thing worse for me than reading a bad book is writing a bad review of it. But I had such a hard time finding anything to like about this book! As a Christian, it's not as if I even had (many) theological objections to the story, and I'm not even opposed to Christian fiction - I like almost everything by CS Lewis, and in my younger years I read and enjoyed Beverly Lewis' books and Francine Rivers' Mark of the Lion trilogy. What I didn't like was the forced allegory. The story seemed to make no sense at all apart from its theological implications - like what motivation did Nick have to participate in nailing the feet of the Woodsman? Really good Christian fiction - or even allegories in general - usually read as good stories in themselves. This one, not so much. One unfortunate effect of the transparency of Alcorn's allegory is that people encounter it like a Bible study, not like a work of fiction - people can't be open-minded about something when the message is constantly being forced on them.
Moreover, even as allegory, what does this book do to make the basic Christian story of salvation seem more real? It seemed to do nothing but provide illustration of some basic Christian concepts, no imagination necessary.
The characterization, too, was rudimentary at best - but I suppose that's what happens when you write an "everyman" character? Speaking of which, I also had some problems with the main character being, in fact, a man. The section on lust was too, too much for me - if the goal was NOT to see women as objects, then don't portray the only women in the book as objects of sexual lust. All we learned is that lust is harmful to the spiritual life of men, and women don't really enjoy it. I understand that the book was written from the perspective of a male character, and I normally wouldn't mind, except that this book is supposed to be a highly generalizable Christian allegory, and assuming the male perspective in this case is just another way of participating in the mistaken idea that men's spirituality is all that matters.
In sum, I really wanted to like this book, and I tried to give it the benefit of the doubt, but there was just nothing there to redeem it. :/