Rewritten, having just seen the movie from last year.
*
This is a hell of a story, which has a whole skein of personal connections to me.
In the mid 1980s Margaret Humphreys was your average social worker living about three miles away from where I’m typing this review, in West Bridgford, Nottingham. She got interested in what happens when adopted children try and trace their biological parents, which as we know is an emotional minefield. One day a letter arrived from Australia from someone who thought Margaret might be able to help her. This woman wanted to find out who she was.
I was four years old when I left England. I was living in a children’s home because my parents were dead, and was put on a boat with other children and sent to Australia. I don’t even know if my name or birthdate are right. All I know for certain is that I once lived in Nottingham.
Margaret checked this woman's sketchy information and fairly quickly found that her mother, at least, wasn't dead at all. So why did she think she was? So she began to tug at this little thread, and found several more, and finally unravelled the whole sorry astonishing story of the child migrants.
BASIC HORRIBLE FACTS
The essential facts of the matter are easily told, but not so easily believed. Between the 1920s and the 1960s various British charities, most with religious affiliation, took about 130,000 children between the ages of three and 14 from children’s homes in the UK, put them on boats, in shipments of varying sizes, and sent them without any family members or guardians firstly to Canada, then in the 40s and 50s to Australia and in a minority of cases to Rhodesia and New Zealand.
When the kids arrived in the colonies they were sent to what was basically the children’s version of prison farms – remote farms run by organisations such as the Christian Brothers where they were schooled and also did all the farm and building maintenance work. The discipline was severe and the pay was poor. Actually, they didn’t get paid at all, they were children. Oh, and quite often they were sexually abused. But you’d guessed that.
When they were grown up they were turned out and left to get on with life wherever they might be, with no explanations of where and why and who they actually were.
WHY DID THE CHARITIES DO THIS THING?
It was a solution to two social problems at once : the children’s homes and orphanages of Britain were full to overflowing in those years - because, as we know, if a woman had an illegitimate child it was taken away from her and put in an orphanage if no adoptive parents could be found - those were the days, hey?; and the British colonies were perceived to be in dire need of “good white stock” - that was the phrase they used!. Wow!
11 August 1938 : His Grace the Archbishop of Perth, Henry LeFanu, in a speech welcoming a shipment of 37 boys (as published in The Record, a Catholic newspaper) :
At a time when empty cradles were contributing woefully to empty spaces, it was necessary to look for external sources of supply. And if we did not supply from our own stock we were leaving ourselves all the more exposed to the menace of the teeming millions of our neighbouring Asiatic races.
To simplify matters, the kids were all told they were orphans (the vast majority weren’t). And the parents (probably mostly single women who thought their kids were in care temporarily while they got their lives together) were told the kids had been adopted by English families!! - they had no idea their kids were put on a boat and sent thousands of miles away.
What extraordinary lies. And of course, the authorities, the Christian charities, the governments who organised this, all thought they were doing a good thing, providing a lovely life for the kids away from the English slums they were born in, in sunny Australia or Canada!
THE ROAD TO HELL IS PAVED WITH GOOD INTENTIONS
So the kids grew up with no family at all, none. They didn’t know what age they were, what their right birthday was, or what their last name was. They had problems but they didn’t know who to talk to. A journalist got interested in Margaret’s investigation and wrote an article in the Observer. The lid was off, and the letters began arriving :
I’m shaking as I write this. This is the first time I’ve allowed myself to think about some of these things.
If I ever get to England I would go to them and say : look what you have done to me.
So suddenly Margaret Humphreys had become the champion of all these now middle-aged and elderly child migrants. They all wanted her to find out who they were. What a job. She got a secondment from her social work position and created the Child Migrants Trust and it took over her whole life. As she began to make enquiries MH was met with institutional amnesia and flat-out hostility from the charities and church organisations. Surprise!!! She had to prise the information out bit by bit. They hated her.
They really hated her.
Well, this plainly written and very compelling book tells the story up to 1994 – there was a documentary, a mini-series, the Order of Australia award for MH, and on 16 November 2009 there was finally an official apology from British Prime Minister Gordon Brown and from Australian PM Kevin Rudd :
"To you who were sent to our shores as children without consent ... we are sorry. Sorry that as children you were taken from your families and placed in institutions where you were so often abused, sorry for the physical suffering, the emotional starvation, and the cold absence of love of tenderness of care. Sorry for the tragedy, the absolute tragedy of childhoods lost, childhoods spent instead in austere and authoritarian places where names were replaced by numbers. The truth is a great evil has been done."
A MOVIE
In 2010 they filmed the story as Oranges and Sunshine starring Emily Watson as Margaret Humphreys. It's a very solid decent attempt to tell a complex story of human unhappiness. One of the things that came through very strongly is that
religious institutions of the past were magnets for sadistic men who enjoyed being cruel to children, and that some of these sadists were also paedophiles, or perhaps men who used kids for sex because their options were very limited, it's hard to tell, and who's going to say anyway. And who wants to draw these distinctions? But here's another head-rattler -
None of these criminals ever came before a court. Their organisation (in this case the Christian Brothers but elsewhere other religious groups) closed up like a giant clam full of vile secrets.
PERSONAL CONNECTIONS
- My maternal grandmother, I discovered, after many years, had an illegitimate child who ended up in Australia. Maybe he was one of these migrant children, maybe he emigrated on his own initiative. I'm not sure.
- One friend of mine who had been adopted got Margaret Humphries to trace her parents - that's a whole other story, but it did have a quasi-happy ending. At the age of 31 she found two sisters she had no idea about.
- And finally, if you watch this movie on dvd pause it at 46 minutes and 20 seconds. Through the car window you can see my old house, the first one I bought!