I'm not entirely sure why I picked this up, but since my bro-in-law left it and I'm always looking for books about women in society... I did pick it up.
Just a note: the title can be misleading. To me, "Why Isn't a Pretty Girl Like You Married?: And Other Useful Comments" sounds like a feminist diatribe against marital expectations forced on us by a patriarchal society. If this is what you were expecting, I’m afraid you’ll be disappointed. The content of the book attempts to address the issues Christian women often struggle with while single, and quite frankly, if you expected that Nancy Wilson, conservative author and wife of the [in]famous Doug Wilson, had penned a feminist rant, you deserve to be disappointed.
You are not the intended audience of this book.
However, that brings me to the question I kept asking myself while reading: who is her intended audience?
In her book, Mrs. Wilson often presents single women as a sort of "other"; switching her address from single women to the church as a whole (e.g. "We need them!”, pg. 27). She suggests in her introduction that unmarried women can become confused by church teachings that focus on married believers, and that they need assistance and instruction, or else they will be unable to find meaning in their unmarried life. Since Mrs. Wilson seems to be addressing this book to single women, this stance is somewhat confusing -- why is she talking about the responsibility of the rest of the church instead the responsibility of her audience? -- and insulting -- are single women really less capable and less aware than their married counterparts to understand how Biblical teaching relates to them? To address the first: Mrs. Wilson suggests many times that the responsibility is uniquely placed on the single girl (the intended audience of the book). On page 37, she asserts that “women can become vulnerable to others” who wish to lead them the wrong way, and that unmarried women are at fault when they begin to submit under men who are not God-ordained for that authority. This seems to me a simplification of the issue: women are capable of taking in advice from a variety of sources and making their own judgment; submission is not always on their minds or in their hearts.
There are many false suppositions and dichotomies Mrs. Wilson brings up: some she deflates with a well-placed scripture (pgs. 23-24), and others she bolsters with emphatic language. “Women are designed to be led” (page 38) – I disagree. PEOPLE are designed to be led, led either by the Holy Spirit or the lusts of the flesh (used by Satan for maximum destruction). She writes that women are either “easily led” (pg. 32) by church authorities, or they are “difficult and unwieldy” (Ibid). Again, I disagree. Men and women are called to submit to proper authorities, but they are also called to test what others say, and to rely on God and his gifts over and above the head of the church.
I'm beginning to believe more and more that this book is not written to me; the young, unmarried, Christian moderate. Mrs. Wilson’s stories of women complaining that single men won't invite them to "unmarrieds" social functions, and women who worry they are "unfruitful" until they're having babies, have convinced me that her audience is a small subset of conservative Christians, ones who commonly teach that marriage is the ultimate goal for their young people. Perhaps (with a lot more subject matter) her book could be made into 2 different books on the subject: one for the unmarried woman, one for the church that preaches only marriage.