Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

Reference and Description: The Case against Two-Dimensionalism

Rate this book
In this book, Scott Soames defends the revolution in philosophy led by Saul Kripke, Hilary Putnam, and David Kaplan against attack from those wishing to revive descriptivism in the philosophy of language, internalism in the philosophy of mind, and conceptualism in the foundations of modality. Soames explains how, in the last twenty-five years, this attack on the anti-descriptivist revolution has coalesced around a technical development called two-dimensional modal logic that seeks to reinterpret the Kripkean categories of the necessary aposteriori and the contingent apriori in ways that drain them of their far-reaching philosophical significance.


Arguing against this reinterpretation, Soames shows how the descriptivist revival has been aided by puzzles and problems ushered in by the anti-descriptivist revolution, as well as by certain errors and missteps in the anti-descriptivist classics themselves. Reference and Description sorts through all this, assesses and consolidates the genuine legacy of Kripke and Kaplan, and launches a thorough and devastating critique of the two-dimensionalist revival of descriptivism. Through it all, Soames attempts to provide the outlines of a lasting, nondescriptivist perspective on meaning, and a nonconceptualist understanding of modality.

384 pages, Paperback

First published November 29, 2004

2 people are currently reading
32 people want to read

About the author

Scott Soames

29 books25 followers
Scott Soames is a professor of philosophy at the University of Southern California. He specializes in the philosophy of language and the history of analytic philosophy.

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
2 (20%)
4 stars
6 (60%)
3 stars
1 (10%)
2 stars
1 (10%)
1 star
0 (0%)
Displaying 1 of 1 review
Profile Image for Charles.
3 reviews1 follower
July 10, 2010
Soames's argument for possible world semantics is weaker than his zesty argument against anti-descriptivism. But this is a good thing; it's refreshing to see that some philosophers still pick fights on purely intellectual grounds--all the more so since metaphysical intensionality gets such short shrift nowadays.
Displaying 1 of 1 review

Can't find what you're looking for?

Get help and learn more about the design.