*Spoilers*
Honestly, I interpreted this story as more of a cautionary tale than anything else, which I doubt it was intended for. In fairness: the book is okay. It’s an easy read, it has adventure and some cool encounters and she does travel to a lot of fascinating places. It’s not terribly written, it’s not awfully insensitive to different cultures, and the author doesn’t waste time pointlessly describing what happened in the less interesting periods of her life, like some memoirs are determined to do.
However.
I have a few bones to pick.
Firstly, I don’t think it’s justified to have on the cover of your book “a love affair with five continents” if you don’t even explore all that much of each continent. Is it fair to count it as having had a “love affair” with the entire continent of Africa, just because you spent a year in Egypt and went to a few other places in the Middle East? No, it’s not. A cool phrase, yes, but not an accurate one.
Secondly, it frustrated me that in all Eaves’ wandering, she never seems to stop and ponder the differences between the cultures all that much. A little, yes, but nothing particularly deep; how is it that you can pass through Yemen and not question either elements of that culture, or elements of your own? There’s such clear differences in morality, in worldview, in understanding of women and classes and family and politics. I just genuinely find it strange that she passes through these places without really changing all that much. As a traveller, you try to be relatively impartial and observe without judging, being tolerant and understanding of differences, and hopefully learning something from it. But you still have some kind of a reaction to radical differences from what you’re used to! That’s what I felt like Eaves seemed to lack; that reaction, that moment when your perception of the world suddenly spins the other way because of something new you’ve never encountered before.
Thirdly, and probably the one that left me a lot more unimpressed than the other factors, is the more or less unabashed patterns of cheating in her relationships. That’s not even a judgemental thing; it’s more just that the author doesn’t even attempt to acknowledge it until the last quarter of the book. For a while I thought “okay, maybe these are casual, open relationships she’s writing about – she is a long-term traveller, maybe there’s an understand going on here, I don’t know the whole story” so I wasn’t too perturbed by it. But then it becomes so painfully obvious that it’s literally just cheating, pure and simple. “Oh, I have a long-term boyfriend in New York? That’s fine, I just met a cute French guy in a nightclub in Cusco (quite possibly one I was in last weekend, eerily enough!) so I’ll just have a fling with him. And never confess it – and go on to have a few more affairs when I move to London.” To be fair, Eaves partially addresses it at that point in the tale. But it takes a good portion of the novel. It’s not even the cheating – that happens in plenty of stories that I love, and it doesn’t irritate me so much as this. It was just the sheer lack of acknowledgement that maybe it wasn’t a good thing to do, what comes across as a lack of responsibility for her own actions.
Obviously everyone has different interpretations about love and relationships, and I wouldn’t put it in a review if it was a novel touted solely as about travel. Because that would be nitpicking. But it’s not irrelevant if the author keeps saying how it’s a story about travel and love/lust/whatever, all intertwined and intermingled. So I find the idea that once that initial spark, that early awareness of passion wears off, she is just automatically done and disappointed with the relationship fairly sad. Is there any long-term relationship that is exactly like it was at the start? I would be pretty surprised. Of course, you might not be looking for a long-term relationship. But she seems to be – but it just seems like an incredibly idealistic and naïve expectation to have of a relationship, that I’ve never heard evidence of existing, even.
And it all ends rather sadly too. She loses Stu, who probably wasn’t the best fit for her as a partner anyway; but she loses the Englishman too, who seems like the good guy. She ends up basically just getting into a relationship because she needs to make rent; and seriously, how sad is it that you could live in a beautiful apartment in Paris, and be blasé? It’s almost like a warning – don’t get too cocky about travelling, or else you won’t appreciate the places that you do go to.
Of course, some of it’s quite relatable. The whole idea of escape, that you can leave and in different places, live different lives – like you get more than one shot to create a character. I totally get that. And the desire to suddenly go everywhere, to the most difficult, far-flung places, just because you can; that’s half the reason I’m currently living in a small town in the Sacred Valley in Peru (that’s a long way from Melbourne, Australia, folks). But like I wrote at the start, appeared to me as quite a cautionary tale; to not let that sense of wanderlust carry you away to total abandon. And as much as it goes against a lot of my travelling instincts, it’s also to make sure you have something left somewhere. Cultivate friendships, even if you aren’t there in person; have somewhere as backup, something to do for employment, someone who will be there for you if all else falls through. Have roots; they don’t have to be strong, but have something.