What do you think?
This Perfect Day
By the author of Rosemary’s Baby, a horrifying journey into a future only Ira Levin could imagine
Considered one of the great dystopian novels—alongside Anthony Burgess’s A Clockwork Orange and Aldous Huxley’s A Brave New World—Ira Levin’s frightening glimpse into the future continues to fascinate readers even forty years after publication. The story is set in a seemingly perfect global society. Uniformity is the defining feature; there is only one language and all ethnic groups have been eugenically merged into one race called “The Family.” The world is ruled by a central computer called UniComp that has been programmed to keep every single human on the surface of the earth in check. People are continually drugged by means of regular injections so that they will remain satisfied and cooperative. They are told where to live, when to eat, whom to marry, when to reproduce. Even the basic facts of nature are subject to the UniComp’s will—men do not grow facial hair, women do not develop breasts, and it only rains at night. With a vision as frightening as any in the history of the science fiction genre, This Perfect Day is one of Ira Levin’s most haunting novels.
Considered one of the great dystopian novels—alongside Anthony Burgess’s A Clockwork Orange and Aldous Huxley’s A Brave New World—Ira Levin’s frightening glimpse into the future continues to fascinate readers even forty years after publication. The story is set in a seemingly perfect global society. Uniformity is the defining feature; there is only one language and all ethnic groups have been eugenically merged into one race called “The Family.” The world is ruled by a central computer called UniComp that has been programmed to keep every single human on the surface of the earth in check. People are continually drugged by means of regular injections so that they will remain satisfied and cooperative. They are told where to live, when to eat, whom to marry, when to reproduce. Even the basic facts of nature are subject to the UniComp’s will—men do not grow facial hair, women do not develop breasts, and it only rains at night. With a vision as frightening as any in the history of the science fiction genre, This Perfect Day is one of Ira Levin’s most haunting novels.
320 pages, Kindle Edition
First published January 1, 1970
About the author
Ira Levin
86 books1,817 followersLevin graduated from the Horace Mann School and New York University, where he majored in philosophy and English.
After college, he wrote training films and scripts for television.
Levin's first produced play was No Time for Sergeants (adapted from Mac Hyman's novel), a comedy about a hillbilly drafted into the United States Air Force that launched the career of Andy Griffith. The play was turned into a movie in 1958, and co-starred Don Knotts, Griffith's long-time co-star and friend. No Time for Sergeants is generally considered the precursor to Gomer Pyle, USMC.
Levin's first novel, A Kiss Before Dying, was well received, earning him the 1954 Edgar Award for Best First Novel. A Kiss Before Dying was turned into a movie twice, first in 1956, and again in 1991.
Levin's best known play is Deathtrap, which holds the record as the longest-running comedy-thriller on Broadway and brought Levin his second Edgar Award. In 1982, it was made into a film starring Christopher Reeve and Michael Caine.
Levin's best known novel is Rosemary's Baby, a horror story of modern day satanism and the occult, set in Manhattan's Upper West Side. It was made into a film starring Mia Farrow and John Cassavetes. Ruth Gordon won an Oscar for Best Actress in a Supporting Role for her performance. Roman Polanski, who wrote and directed the film, was nominated for Best Writing, Screenplay Based on Material from Another Medium.
Other Levin novels were turned into movies, including The Boys from Brazil in 1978; The Stepford Wives in 1975 and again in 2004; and Sliver in 1993.
Stephen King has described Ira Levin as "the Swiss watchmaker of suspense novels, he makes what the rest of us do look like cheap watchmakers in drugstores." Chuck Palahniuk, in , calls Levin's writing "a smart, updated version of the kind of folksy legends that cultures have always used."
Ira Levin died from a heart attack at his home in Manhattan, on 12 November 2007. He was seventy-eight at the time of his death.
After college, he wrote training films and scripts for television.
Levin's first produced play was No Time for Sergeants (adapted from Mac Hyman's novel), a comedy about a hillbilly drafted into the United States Air Force that launched the career of Andy Griffith. The play was turned into a movie in 1958, and co-starred Don Knotts, Griffith's long-time co-star and friend. No Time for Sergeants is generally considered the precursor to Gomer Pyle, USMC.
Levin's first novel, A Kiss Before Dying, was well received, earning him the 1954 Edgar Award for Best First Novel. A Kiss Before Dying was turned into a movie twice, first in 1956, and again in 1991.
Levin's best known play is Deathtrap, which holds the record as the longest-running comedy-thriller on Broadway and brought Levin his second Edgar Award. In 1982, it was made into a film starring Christopher Reeve and Michael Caine.
Levin's best known novel is Rosemary's Baby, a horror story of modern day satanism and the occult, set in Manhattan's Upper West Side. It was made into a film starring Mia Farrow and John Cassavetes. Ruth Gordon won an Oscar for Best Actress in a Supporting Role for her performance. Roman Polanski, who wrote and directed the film, was nominated for Best Writing, Screenplay Based on Material from Another Medium.
Other Levin novels were turned into movies, including The Boys from Brazil in 1978; The Stepford Wives in 1975 and again in 2004; and Sliver in 1993.
Stephen King has described Ira Levin as "the Swiss watchmaker of suspense novels, he makes what the rest of us do look like cheap watchmakers in drugstores." Chuck Palahniuk, in , calls Levin's writing "a smart, updated version of the kind of folksy legends that cultures have always used."
Ira Levin died from a heart attack at his home in Manhattan, on 12 November 2007. He was seventy-eight at the time of his death.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 1,105 reviews
June 7, 2021
Reckoning
Written in 1969, this dystopian classic from Ira Levin delves into the social science curiosity of political/social structure and population subservience. In a totalitarian society with mass surveillance, mandatory drug treatments, and complete control of everyone's job, pastime, partner, friends and lifespan, a central intelligence system called Uni, is all powerful.
Chip is the main protagonist, his nameber (not misspelt) is Li RM35M4419, and since the great Unification everyone is part of The Family, and their world does not know aggression, sadness, regret, hatred, greed, and poverty. Their lives, however, do not experience curiosity, choice, love, or freedom, and if there are signs that any of these emotions or thoughts exist, the monthly Treatment will likely irradicate them through higher drug doses or a few more potent drugs to bring members back into line. The relaxed and uninhibited nature of reporting on colleagues, family, and friends was unsettling and considered the duty to help treat a sickness. Through this process, Chip starts to feel guilt over the information he already provided about others and starts to withhold information from his advisor.
Chip works in the Institute of Genetic Engineering and we realise from the appearance of members of the Family that gradually the physical appearance of all the World’s races are slowly being genetically consolidated. He works as a genetic taxonomist, has his treatments once per month, performs dispassionate sex on a Saturday, communicates regularly with his advisor, and visits his parents twice per year. He notices himself becoming more creative and questioning in the last few days before his monthly treatments but when he returns after treatment he is once again a compliant member of the Family and can put the previous few day’s ‘sickness’ behind him.
Chip is approached by a group of free thinkers who explain how he can fool the system and become free to think throughout the month and do things beyond what is deemed acceptable. The more Chip learns, the more he wants to know and he explores ways of escaping or overcoming the control of Uni. Some people are ‘incurable’ and it is believed they live on Islands remote from The Family.
This Perfect Day is an allegory illustrating that peace and security in life are possible if we forego, choice, privacy, individuality, and the capacity to create, imagine and love in all its different ways. The worst in our human nature may well lead us on a path to destruction and we can ruminate whether the ultimate price of compliance to Uni, is a price worth paying. There is, however, something in our nature that fervently refuses to consciously give up Our Freeeeeeeeeeeedom (as William Wallace would say).
Ira Levin’s novel is a profound book that explores what we understand by the individual and its uniqueness, and how totalitarian regimes exert control and diminish the individual. It seems as we look at the World today, that while we seem incapable of securing all the requirements of how politics and society should behave for equal rights and opportunity, but we need to treasure the aspects that mean most. This was a Buddy read with Julie. Her insights and discussion proved invaluable in fully appreciating this novel, not only because of its philosophical nature but also because it is an entertaining story with adventure, drama, relationships, and interesting characters. I would highly recommend this book and also thank Julie for her patience and discussion.
Written in 1969, this dystopian classic from Ira Levin delves into the social science curiosity of political/social structure and population subservience. In a totalitarian society with mass surveillance, mandatory drug treatments, and complete control of everyone's job, pastime, partner, friends and lifespan, a central intelligence system called Uni, is all powerful.
Chip is the main protagonist, his nameber (not misspelt) is Li RM35M4419, and since the great Unification everyone is part of The Family, and their world does not know aggression, sadness, regret, hatred, greed, and poverty. Their lives, however, do not experience curiosity, choice, love, or freedom, and if there are signs that any of these emotions or thoughts exist, the monthly Treatment will likely irradicate them through higher drug doses or a few more potent drugs to bring members back into line. The relaxed and uninhibited nature of reporting on colleagues, family, and friends was unsettling and considered the duty to help treat a sickness. Through this process, Chip starts to feel guilt over the information he already provided about others and starts to withhold information from his advisor.
Chip works in the Institute of Genetic Engineering and we realise from the appearance of members of the Family that gradually the physical appearance of all the World’s races are slowly being genetically consolidated. He works as a genetic taxonomist, has his treatments once per month, performs dispassionate sex on a Saturday, communicates regularly with his advisor, and visits his parents twice per year. He notices himself becoming more creative and questioning in the last few days before his monthly treatments but when he returns after treatment he is once again a compliant member of the Family and can put the previous few day’s ‘sickness’ behind him.
Chip is approached by a group of free thinkers who explain how he can fool the system and become free to think throughout the month and do things beyond what is deemed acceptable. The more Chip learns, the more he wants to know and he explores ways of escaping or overcoming the control of Uni. Some people are ‘incurable’ and it is believed they live on Islands remote from The Family.
This Perfect Day is an allegory illustrating that peace and security in life are possible if we forego, choice, privacy, individuality, and the capacity to create, imagine and love in all its different ways. The worst in our human nature may well lead us on a path to destruction and we can ruminate whether the ultimate price of compliance to Uni, is a price worth paying. There is, however, something in our nature that fervently refuses to consciously give up Our Freeeeeeeeeeeedom (as William Wallace would say).
Ira Levin’s novel is a profound book that explores what we understand by the individual and its uniqueness, and how totalitarian regimes exert control and diminish the individual. It seems as we look at the World today, that while we seem incapable of securing all the requirements of how politics and society should behave for equal rights and opportunity, but we need to treasure the aspects that mean most. This was a Buddy read with Julie. Her insights and discussion proved invaluable in fully appreciating this novel, not only because of its philosophical nature but also because it is an entertaining story with adventure, drama, relationships, and interesting characters. I would highly recommend this book and also thank Julie for her patience and discussion.
June 16, 2021
I loved Ira Levin's thriller from 1972, The Stepford Wives, and I was excited to find this slightly earlier work of his, This Perfect Day, a book that was previously unknown to me.
As soon as I started reading it, I felt incredibly inspired, to think that one person could publish two stories like these, two years apart from each other. Like. . . who does this?? Who goes from one amazing concept to another, and in just two years?
I can't help but wonder if Mr. Levin's writing was influenced by some of Ray Bradbury's earlier works, and I wondered, also, if this story had any influence on Margaret Atwood's The Handmaid's Tale and/or Lois Lowry's The Giver?
I was feelin' groovy reading this novel, published in 1970, about the futuristic world of Uni and its members who are a part of a Utopia because of their special “treatments.”
I was loving this read, and I felt almost as breathless with tension and anticipation as I was when I read Wives. . . but when I got to page 192 and I encountered yet another gratuitous rape scene from a 1970s novel that had nothing to do with the plot or character development. . . I became very, very sad.
I typically become angry when I back up against a rape scene that is intended to be “scintillating,” but this time, I actually felt sad and disappointed.
How could a visionary like Ira Levin have the ability to imagine a future where an egalitarian society has achieved world peace (even if it's because everyone's essentially drugged!), but still stumble over his own preconceptions in the early 1970s that a woman's sole purpose is to be a subdued sex toy?
It got worse. When I got to page 283, he threw some totally unnecessary “incest” into the mix, just to really make me grieve.
It's interesting to me that J.G. Ballard's High Rise, Peter Benchley's Jaws and Ira Levin's This Perfect Day were all written between 1970 and 1975. What they have in common: all three were brilliant, conceptually, yet irrevocably tainted (for me) by rape and rape fantasy scenes that had nothing whatsoever to do with the plot.
I've given all three of these novels a three star rating, reluctantly, for the concepts that I wish, wish, wish, hadn't been ruined for me.
As soon as I started reading it, I felt incredibly inspired, to think that one person could publish two stories like these, two years apart from each other. Like. . . who does this?? Who goes from one amazing concept to another, and in just two years?
I can't help but wonder if Mr. Levin's writing was influenced by some of Ray Bradbury's earlier works, and I wondered, also, if this story had any influence on Margaret Atwood's The Handmaid's Tale and/or Lois Lowry's The Giver?
I was feelin' groovy reading this novel, published in 1970, about the futuristic world of Uni and its members who are a part of a Utopia because of their special “treatments.”
I was loving this read, and I felt almost as breathless with tension and anticipation as I was when I read Wives. . . but when I got to page 192 and I encountered yet another gratuitous rape scene from a 1970s novel that had nothing to do with the plot or character development. . . I became very, very sad.
I typically become angry when I back up against a rape scene that is intended to be “scintillating,” but this time, I actually felt sad and disappointed.
How could a visionary like Ira Levin have the ability to imagine a future where an egalitarian society has achieved world peace (even if it's because everyone's essentially drugged!), but still stumble over his own preconceptions in the early 1970s that a woman's sole purpose is to be a subdued sex toy?
It got worse. When I got to page 283, he threw some totally unnecessary “incest” into the mix, just to really make me grieve.
It's interesting to me that J.G. Ballard's High Rise, Peter Benchley's Jaws and Ira Levin's This Perfect Day were all written between 1970 and 1975. What they have in common: all three were brilliant, conceptually, yet irrevocably tainted (for me) by rape and rape fantasy scenes that had nothing whatsoever to do with the plot.
I've given all three of these novels a three star rating, reluctantly, for the concepts that I wish, wish, wish, hadn't been ruined for me.
January 25, 2008
I am not the type of person who rereads books. In fact, I never reread books. Except this one. I pick it up every couple of years. This is A Brave New World but so much better. So much realer. Unfortunately, it is now out of print. But maybe with the author's recent passing, they will bring it back soon. But if you ever see it in a used book store, pick it up and buy it. Don't think. Just walk over to the cash register and buy it. Then go home and read it. You'll thank me.
April 6, 2012
I'm kind of sorry to give this book two stars, because it is a very good story and in it's own way a good addition to the dystopian genre. I've read two other Ira Levin books before this one; 'A Kiss Before Dying' and 'Rosemary's Baby' and enjoyed both of those, and I will go on and read other works of his. My niggles with it are personal ones which I felt were unnecessary and unrealistic. Even dated maybe.
SPOILERS!!
So, for me to explain my problems with this book I have to talk about the story. On the whole I enjoyed the tale of an individual questioning the society he lives in and taking steps to escape it and find something else and ultimately better. The journey however doesn't end with escape but on the taking on of the central force which controls the world and the way it works in the first place. All this made for excellent reading! The fact that he didn't want to do it alone but with the woman he loved is also pleasing. However, did he have to rape her? And did she then have to submit to him after? Is this very realistic? She seemed to be apologising for the events which led up to his forceful lustfulness and inevitable forgiving him nothing really, but justifying his very act of savage impulses. I hated it for that. The story then continues as if it never happened and they continue as any couple in love and against society. For this I have a lower rating than what it could have deserved. Maybe, I've missed some point and the rape was necessary to demonstrate his primal nature coming through or something or this sort, but I just thought it was distasteful and sexist. It isn't detailed if anyone who hasn't read it yet but is reading this spoiler, it's just the very fact that the rape took place followed by feminine passivity, compliance and ultimately respect. YUCK!
So there, for anyone that disagrees feel free. I don't care.
Ok, final niggle and that is of the secret group sexual dynamics. The secret meeting were split into couples, or at least that is what they were trying to do. Three pairings of opposite sexes, for which they never did find a mate for sparrow. Snowflake even felt sorry for the fact that she use to freely partake in sexual activities with the other girl Sparrow. So this society is homophobic as well as sexist and they each feel they should only pair up with another of the opposite sex. In a way I don't think this is a problem in the story as they probably believe this is right because their closely monitored society will not see the logic of same gender relations as this doesn't work for breeding, but there is no evidence of anyone falling in love with or displaying attraction towards their own sex and it would happen. There would be gay couples on that island and there would be sexual discovery going on outside of the chemically conditioned family. I felt that the only mention of it in this book was in a negative context or one of mockery.
Anyway, I'm jumping off my pedestal now.
Sorry Mr Levin but I'm sticking with 2 stars!
SPOILERS!!
So, for me to explain my problems with this book I have to talk about the story. On the whole I enjoyed the tale of an individual questioning the society he lives in and taking steps to escape it and find something else and ultimately better. The journey however doesn't end with escape but on the taking on of the central force which controls the world and the way it works in the first place. All this made for excellent reading! The fact that he didn't want to do it alone but with the woman he loved is also pleasing. However, did he have to rape her? And did she then have to submit to him after? Is this very realistic? She seemed to be apologising for the events which led up to his forceful lustfulness and inevitable forgiving him nothing really, but justifying his very act of savage impulses. I hated it for that. The story then continues as if it never happened and they continue as any couple in love and against society. For this I have a lower rating than what it could have deserved. Maybe, I've missed some point and the rape was necessary to demonstrate his primal nature coming through or something or this sort, but I just thought it was distasteful and sexist. It isn't detailed if anyone who hasn't read it yet but is reading this spoiler, it's just the very fact that the rape took place followed by feminine passivity, compliance and ultimately respect. YUCK!
So there, for anyone that disagrees feel free. I don't care.
Ok, final niggle and that is of the secret group sexual dynamics. The secret meeting were split into couples, or at least that is what they were trying to do. Three pairings of opposite sexes, for which they never did find a mate for sparrow. Snowflake even felt sorry for the fact that she use to freely partake in sexual activities with the other girl Sparrow. So this society is homophobic as well as sexist and they each feel they should only pair up with another of the opposite sex. In a way I don't think this is a problem in the story as they probably believe this is right because their closely monitored society will not see the logic of same gender relations as this doesn't work for breeding, but there is no evidence of anyone falling in love with or displaying attraction towards their own sex and it would happen. There would be gay couples on that island and there would be sexual discovery going on outside of the chemically conditioned family. I felt that the only mention of it in this book was in a negative context or one of mockery.
Anyway, I'm jumping off my pedestal now.
Sorry Mr Levin but I'm sticking with 2 stars!
August 27, 2022
روزگار بی عیب و نقص ، نوشته آیرا لوین نویسنده معروف آمریکایی اگرچه 50 سال پیش نوشته شده اما به گونه ای شگفت انگیزهم چنان به روز و تازه به نظر می رسد . رمان علمی تخیلی او اگر چه پیچیدگی چندانی ندارد اما سرشار از نوآوری هایی ایست که امروزه بیشتر آشنا به نظر می رسند .
در کتاب لوین ، کامپیوتری به نام یونی کامپ به گونه ای برنامه ریزی شده که اختیارات بسیار زیادی دارد ، یونی بر تک تک افراد نظارت دارد و آنها را از راه های مختلف کنترل می کند ، محل زندگی آنها را تعیین می کند و مشخص می کند که افراد با چه کسی ازدواج کنند و آیا می توانند بچه دار شوند یا نه ؟ چگونگی آموزش افراد و انتخاب شغل هم با یونی ایست . یونی از طریق درمان های ماهیانه افراد را راضی و آرام نگه داشته والبته از این راه به گونه ای سرشت و غریزه جنسی افراد را هم کنترل و به گونه ای سرکوب می کند .
یونی و ایده ای که آنرا اداره یا برنامه ریزی می کند روش شگفت انگیزی برای خارج کردن افراد ناراضی از قلمرو خود دارند ، آنها از این راه افراد یاغی را از سرزمین های خود بیرون کرده و سپس افراد با قابلیت رهبری و با هوش و استقامت را دوباره برای سیستم برنامه ریزی خود ، انتخاب می کنند . لوین نابغه از فرصت زندگی افراد در قلمرو خارج از قدرت یونی استفاده کرده و محیطی سرشار از فساد ، تبعیض ، بی کاری و مشکلات اقتصادی را تصویر کشیده ، در حقیقت سرزمینی که نویسنده توصیف کرده با وجود بهره مند بودن از نعمت آزادی ، فرق چندانی با ویران شهر ندارد ، تنها جنس مشکلات آن متفاوت است .
روزگار بی عیب و نقص به گونه ای شگفت آور روان نوشته شده است ، لوین نابغه با جملاتی آسان زندگی در ویران شهر وسرزمین تقریبا مخالف آنرا با هم مقایسه کرده و اگرچه شاید هم به نتیجه یکسانی رسیده باشد اما در پایان کتاب ، او زیستن با اراده آزاد و داشتن حق انتخاب را به زندگی خالی از مفهوم و پوچ تحت نظارت یونی یا هر گروه دیگری ترجیح داده است .
در کتاب لوین ، کامپیوتری به نام یونی کامپ به گونه ای برنامه ریزی شده که اختیارات بسیار زیادی دارد ، یونی بر تک تک افراد نظارت دارد و آنها را از راه های مختلف کنترل می کند ، محل زندگی آنها را تعیین می کند و مشخص می کند که افراد با چه کسی ازدواج کنند و آیا می توانند بچه دار شوند یا نه ؟ چگونگی آموزش افراد و انتخاب شغل هم با یونی ایست . یونی از طریق درمان های ماهیانه افراد را راضی و آرام نگه داشته والبته از این راه به گونه ای سرشت و غریزه جنسی افراد را هم کنترل و به گونه ای سرکوب می کند .
یونی و ایده ای که آنرا اداره یا برنامه ریزی می کند روش شگفت انگیزی برای خارج کردن افراد ناراضی از قلمرو خود دارند ، آنها از این راه افراد یاغی را از سرزمین های خود بیرون کرده و سپس افراد با قابلیت رهبری و با هوش و استقامت را دوباره برای سیستم برنامه ریزی خود ، انتخاب می کنند . لوین نابغه از فرصت زندگی افراد در قلمرو خارج از قدرت یونی استفاده کرده و محیطی سرشار از فساد ، تبعیض ، بی کاری و مشکلات اقتصادی را تصویر کشیده ، در حقیقت سرزمینی که نویسنده توصیف کرده با وجود بهره مند بودن از نعمت آزادی ، فرق چندانی با ویران شهر ندارد ، تنها جنس مشکلات آن متفاوت است .
روزگار بی عیب و نقص به گونه ای شگفت آور روان نوشته شده است ، لوین نابغه با جملاتی آسان زندگی در ویران شهر وسرزمین تقریبا مخالف آنرا با هم مقایسه کرده و اگرچه شاید هم به نتیجه یکسانی رسیده باشد اما در پایان کتاب ، او زیستن با اراده آزاد و داشتن حق انتخاب را به زندگی خالی از مفهوم و پوچ تحت نظارت یونی یا هر گروه دیگری ترجیح داده است .
February 26, 2022
از نظر توصیف آرمانشهرش در مقایسه با بقیهی رمانهای ضدآرمانشهری شاید خیلی چیز جدیدی نداشته باشه و تکراری به نظر بیاد، ولی در نیمهی دوم کتاب یک تفاوت نبوغآمیزی با اغلب رمانهای مشابه پیدا میکنه که خوندنش رو به نظر من واجب میکنه. و البته از بخش آخر کتاب («جنگ») خوشم نیومد. به نظرم میبایست یه پایان ناامیدکننده داشته باشه
February 4, 2009
This is the March book for the Pittsburgh Dystopian Science Fiction Club. Before I get to anything else, I'm going to address the problematic gender dynamics in this book. I think one of the things that has often turned me off to science fiction in the past has been the dude factor, which I find extensively in this book. Maybe I just don't like it when straight men write sex scenes. At any rate, let me tell the world this: the "incredibly hot chick falls in love with me after I rape her" storyline is tiresome. I don't care what decade you wrote this in. Stop doing it.
Okay then, now on to the rest of the book. I found this book to mimic the moral/theme of many other books of this genre, namely the "USA good, Russia bad" message. In other words, the possible societal choices offered are a strictly regimented and totalitarian system and one of supposed free choice but which is actually ruled by brute force. And the choice is always clear: it's better to live in a brutal society with greater choice than one in which you're life is controlled by a system. It just seems to be book after book with the same message, never with the idea that there could be a choice other than these two.
Okay then, now on to the rest of the book. I found this book to mimic the moral/theme of many other books of this genre, namely the "USA good, Russia bad" message. In other words, the possible societal choices offered are a strictly regimented and totalitarian system and one of supposed free choice but which is actually ruled by brute force. And the choice is always clear: it's better to live in a brutal society with greater choice than one in which you're life is controlled by a system. It just seems to be book after book with the same message, never with the idea that there could be a choice other than these two.
May 27, 2016
Completed way back in June, 1969, Ira Levin's novel THIS PERFECT DAY introduces a futuristic colony with a computer at the helm where everyone is programmed to be cold and lifeless, and everyone, as a member of the "family" is monitored throughout the day.
"Even the basic facts of nature are subject to the Unicomp's will ----- men do not grow facial hair, women do not develop breasts, and it only rains at night."
Lots of action and some pretty cool twists along the way keep things from becoming too dulled or normalized as Chip aka Li RM35M4419 with his one green eye, and a few of his witty non-conforming pals, have some different views on the subject.
GREAT sci-fi Classic!
August 12, 2023
کتاب دربارهی آرمانشهری است که توسط رایانهای به نام یونیکامپ اداره میشود، آرمانشهری که حتی زمان مرگ آدمها و اینکه تا چه سنی میتوانند زندگی کنند را هم مشخص میکند، تغذیه، روابط عاطفی، ازدواج و ...
در این بین افرادی موفق به فرار از یونی میشوند، آنها کسانی هستند که یونی را مقصر میدانند و معتقدند که باید با آن جنگید چرا که احتمال هیچ تغییری در آینده وجود ندارد.
چیپ یکی از شخصیتهای اصلی داستان است. در کودکی واژهای به نام "جنگ" برایش عجیب است. به او میگویند که در زمانهای قدیم مردم با هم جنگ یا دعوا میکردند. ولی حالا که یونیکامپ ساخته شده، هر کدام از اعضای خانواده آن را دارد تا همهی جای دنیا از او مواظبت کند. یونیکامپی که حتی پدربزرگ چیپ هم در ساختنش نقش داشته است.
کتاب چهار فصل دارد: رشد، زندگی، فرار و جنگ
در این بین افرادی موفق به فرار از یونی میشوند، آنها کسانی هستند که یونی را مقصر میدانند و معتقدند که باید با آن جنگید چرا که احتمال هیچ تغییری در آینده وجود ندارد.
چیپ یکی از شخصیتهای اصلی داستان است. در کودکی واژهای به نام "جنگ" برایش عجیب است. به او میگویند که در زمانهای قدیم مردم با هم جنگ یا دعوا میکردند. ولی حالا که یونیکامپ ساخته شده، هر کدام از اعضای خانواده آن را دارد تا همهی جای دنیا از او مواظبت کند. یونیکامپی که حتی پدربزرگ چیپ هم در ساختنش نقش داشته است.
کتاب چهار فصل دارد: رشد، زندگی، فرار و جنگ
March 15, 2015
This 1971 novel presents an early imaginative vision of a computer controlled dystopian society masquerading as a utopia. It’s more in the tradition of Brave New World than 1984 in that thought control is not by propaganda but by all intrusive counselors and drugs. The Soma in this tale goes beyond rendering pleasure and a sense of contentment, but pacifies by dampening emotions and curiosity. As in Huxley’s masterpiece, promiscuity is encouraged adding to a populace of happy, shiny people who keep the economy going. The computers come in by tracking everyone’s activities recorded in their electronic bracelets and written into counselor records. Any behaviors suggestive of subversive thought or action guides UniComs computation and selections of reinforcements and punishments as a pervasive background activity to shape good citizens. And anything that reflects independent action fits the bill as a threat to the uniformity of belief in the godlike central computer, UniComp, and the race of humanity revered as “The Family”.
Chip as a boy gets tagged as a threat when, under the influence of his computer engineer grandfather, he begins to wonder what career he might choose for himself rather that trust in UniComp’s wisdom. He also gets seeded with a perception of UniComp as cold machinery when this grandfather gives him a secret tour of the banks of servers comprising the AI. The experience of undermedication in one period leads Chip feel more alive and able to think better, and he learns ways of fake his way into getting lower dosages. He discovers and joins a group of similar malcontents who spend time together having fun at night, fooling around in a museum of ancient Earth, smoking tobacco, and having more enjoyable sex. Eventually they discover there are islands with people living primitively outside The Family and UniCom.
I won’t say any more about the plot, except that you can guess the dream of a return to a society with more freedom will compel Chip to take revolutionary action. As Chip learns to be more human, he makes mistakes due to his stunted development, but he eventually becomes worthy of empathy instead of pity. The plot has some surprising turns as Chip gets closer to unveiling and dealing with the wizards behind this Oz.
The popularity of brainwashing and mind control as the foundation of a totalitarian society has declined in literature both from the failure of the science and from the decline of communism. Despite this dated theme and the as-yet unborn powers of Clarke’s Hal, this made for a pretty compelling read. And it captured well in fairly timeless fashion the drama of an individual putting a lot on the line to address the futility and alienation of a false utopia. It doesn’t have the thrills of his “Rosemary’s Baby” or the satirical horror of “The Stepford Wives” (judging from the movies, not the books), but it’s solid enough as dystopian sci fi that I wish Levin had written more in the genre before passing on in 2007.
Chip as a boy gets tagged as a threat when, under the influence of his computer engineer grandfather, he begins to wonder what career he might choose for himself rather that trust in UniComp’s wisdom. He also gets seeded with a perception of UniComp as cold machinery when this grandfather gives him a secret tour of the banks of servers comprising the AI. The experience of undermedication in one period leads Chip feel more alive and able to think better, and he learns ways of fake his way into getting lower dosages. He discovers and joins a group of similar malcontents who spend time together having fun at night, fooling around in a museum of ancient Earth, smoking tobacco, and having more enjoyable sex. Eventually they discover there are islands with people living primitively outside The Family and UniCom.
I won’t say any more about the plot, except that you can guess the dream of a return to a society with more freedom will compel Chip to take revolutionary action. As Chip learns to be more human, he makes mistakes due to his stunted development, but he eventually becomes worthy of empathy instead of pity. The plot has some surprising turns as Chip gets closer to unveiling and dealing with the wizards behind this Oz.
The popularity of brainwashing and mind control as the foundation of a totalitarian society has declined in literature both from the failure of the science and from the decline of communism. Despite this dated theme and the as-yet unborn powers of Clarke’s Hal, this made for a pretty compelling read. And it captured well in fairly timeless fashion the drama of an individual putting a lot on the line to address the futility and alienation of a false utopia. It doesn’t have the thrills of his “Rosemary’s Baby” or the satirical horror of “The Stepford Wives” (judging from the movies, not the books), but it’s solid enough as dystopian sci fi that I wish Levin had written more in the genre before passing on in 2007.
July 21, 2022
I blasted through this, just as I did with all the other Levin books I've read, but it is by far my least favourite (I am not reading Son of Rosemary or Sliver so can't comment on those).
Rosemary's Baby, The Stepford Wives, The Boys from Brazil and A Kiss Before Dying were all great stories. Levin has this easy, informal way of spinning a yarn-- chapters that flow quickly into one another, good dialogue, and characters that capture your interest (both the protagonists and villains as horrendous as Josef Mengele.) I'd say this is the only one of the five that doesn't go down quite as easy.
It's partially the lack of a really great hero or villain to fear for or despise. This Perfect Day is set in a dystopian future where everyone is virtually the same-- looks similar, behaves in line with the society's rules, and doesn't do anything ludicrous like dream or imagine or make their own decisions. However, as with pretty much every dystopian ever, there is a secret resistance of those who have learned to avoid being dosed up with "treatments" and started to question the way things are.
It is the nature of this society for it to be cold, detached and uniform. No one stands out, including the protagonist, Chip. He spends a good portion of the book being a well-behaved zombie and the rest of the time being a touch of an arsehole. I'm not exaggerating. The guy's an actual
Then there's the fact that this kind of dystopia was a bit "been there, done that" back in the 70s when it published. Today? Seen it all before.
Rosemary's Baby, The Stepford Wives, The Boys from Brazil and A Kiss Before Dying were all great stories. Levin has this easy, informal way of spinning a yarn-- chapters that flow quickly into one another, good dialogue, and characters that capture your interest (both the protagonists and villains as horrendous as Josef Mengele.) I'd say this is the only one of the five that doesn't go down quite as easy.
It's partially the lack of a really great hero or villain to fear for or despise. This Perfect Day is set in a dystopian future where everyone is virtually the same-- looks similar, behaves in line with the society's rules, and doesn't do anything ludicrous like dream or imagine or make their own decisions. However, as with pretty much every dystopian ever, there is a secret resistance of those who have learned to avoid being dosed up with "treatments" and started to question the way things are.
It is the nature of this society for it to be cold, detached and uniform. No one stands out, including the protagonist, Chip. He spends a good portion of the book being a well-behaved zombie and the rest of the time being a touch of an arsehole. I'm not exaggerating. The guy's an actual
Then there's the fact that this kind of dystopia was a bit "been there, done that" back in the 70s when it published. Today? Seen it all before.
March 1, 2025
Frequently tedious, this really should have been edited to about half its length. It generally feels dated, a product of its time, not altogether different than Logan's Run and other such dystopian novels of the 60's and 70's that were I think were partly an expression of "future shock" and fears at the time of humanity sacrificing freedoms for the efficiencies afforded by technology. The narrative is fairly flat and dry, and the plot only really gets interesting towards the very end with the introduction of an unexpected twist.
April 20, 2026
در کتاب روزگار بیعیب و نقص اثر آیرا لوین در نگاه اول با یه آرمانشهر طرفیم که توش خبری از جنگ و فقر و بیماری و ناراحتی نیست. همه آدما توش خوشحال و منظم و برابر هستن.
دنیای خوبی به نظر میاد مگه نه؟
خب شاید نه کاملا
همه اینا با یه قیمت سنگین به دست اومده. یه کامپیوتر مرکزی هست به اسم یونی کامپ که همه چیز رو کنترل میکنه. از ازدواج و شغل و اسم تو گرفته تا احساسات و حتی تعداد و زمان رابطه داشتن تو. تو هیچ انتخاب واقعی نداری. خواستن به معنی بیماری شناسایی میشه و هر چیزی که بخوای یعنی باید درمان شی. فردیت معنایی نداره و فقط یک خانواده بزرگ وجود داره.هر چند روز یک بار دوز دارویی که بهت تزریق میکنن مشخص میشه و با توجه به شرایط تو ممکنه اون دوز رو زیاد یا کم کنن ولی خیالت راحت باشه که بعد زدن اون دوز از دارو تو از تمام شرایط موجود خوشحال خواهی بود و اگه حتی یک نفر حرف عجیبی بزنه یا کار عجیبی انجام بده تو سریع اونو لو میدی چون کار درست همینه.
حالا اینو در نظر بگیرید که این کتاب ۵۵ سال پیش نوشته شده و خیلی شبیه زندگی مدرنه. الگوریتمها بهت میگن چی ببینی، سیستمها تصمیم میگیرن چی بخری، دادههای شخصی کنترل میشه و خیلی وقتا به نظر ما داریم انتخاب میکنیم درحالی که انتخابهای ما دستکاری شدن و یه استانداردسازی صورت گرفته.
اگه همهچیز کامل باشه، آیا هنوزم انسان هستیم؟
آیا برای انسان بودن باید ناقص بمونیم؟
تو دنیایی که مردم راضی و خوشحال هستن کنترل مردم با لذت و رضایت انجام میشه، حقیقت دستکاری نمیشه و فقط بیاهمیت میشه و قدرت تو رو راضی نگه میداره تا حتی نخوای فرار کنی. کاملا برعکس چیزی که تو کتاب 1984 خوندیم و اونجا قدرت تو رو میشکنه و با ترس و شکنجه کنترل میکنه و حقیقت دائم تحریف میشه.
ولی به نظرم کنترل وقتی خطرناکتره که شبیه آزادی باشه.یه جایی خوندم که خطرناکترین زندان، زندانیه که زندانیهاش ازش راضی باشن.
در نهایت اگه کنترل باعث خوشبختی بشه، آیا باید قبولش کنیم؟
کتاب داستان روان و خوبی داشت و شخصیت اصلی خوب پرداخت شده بود. داستان واقعا خوب بود و قسمت پایانی هم برام جالب بود و چرخش جالبی داشت ولی بازم از نظر شخصی و حسم به کتاب نمیتونم بهش امتیاز کامل رو بدم. خیلی وقتا فکر میکنم دارم سخت میگیرم :))) ولی جا داشت بهتر باشه.
شخصیتهای فرعی خیلی سطحی بودن و همون بخش آخر کتاب میتونست بهتر باشه.
البته ترجمه کتاب هم یه جاهایی یه ایرادای عجیبی داشت. انگار یه گوگل ترنسلیت قدیمی بعضی قسمتاش رو ترجمه کرده. واقعا ایراد ابتدایی بود که چند بارم تکرار شد ولی میشه کتاب رو خوند و اوکیه و من پیشنهادش میکنم.
4.5/5⭐
دنیای خوبی به نظر میاد مگه نه؟
خب شاید نه کاملا
همه اینا با یه قیمت سنگین به دست اومده. یه کامپیوتر مرکزی هست به اسم یونی کامپ که همه چیز رو کنترل میکنه. از ازدواج و شغل و اسم تو گرفته تا احساسات و حتی تعداد و زمان رابطه داشتن تو. تو هیچ انتخاب واقعی نداری. خواستن به معنی بیماری شناسایی میشه و هر چیزی که بخوای یعنی باید درمان شی. فردیت معنایی نداره و فقط یک خانواده بزرگ وجود داره.هر چند روز یک بار دوز دارویی که بهت تزریق میکنن مشخص میشه و با توجه به شرایط تو ممکنه اون دوز رو زیاد یا کم کنن ولی خیالت راحت باشه که بعد زدن اون دوز از دارو تو از تمام شرایط موجود خوشحال خواهی بود و اگه حتی یک نفر حرف عجیبی بزنه یا کار عجیبی انجام بده تو سریع اونو لو میدی چون کار درست همینه.
حالا اینو در نظر بگیرید که این کتاب ۵۵ سال پیش نوشته شده و خیلی شبیه زندگی مدرنه. الگوریتمها بهت میگن چی ببینی، سیستمها تصمیم میگیرن چی بخری، دادههای شخصی کنترل میشه و خیلی وقتا به نظر ما داریم انتخاب میکنیم درحالی که انتخابهای ما دستکاری شدن و یه استانداردسازی صورت گرفته.
اگه همهچیز کامل باشه، آیا هنوزم انسان هستیم؟
آیا برای انسان بودن باید ناقص بمونیم؟
تو دنیایی که مردم راضی و خوشحال هستن کنترل مردم با لذت و رضایت انجام میشه، حقیقت دستکاری نمیشه و فقط بیاهمیت میشه و قدرت تو رو راضی نگه میداره تا حتی نخوای فرار کنی. کاملا برعکس چیزی که تو کتاب 1984 خوندیم و اونجا قدرت تو رو میشکنه و با ترس و شکنجه کنترل میکنه و حقیقت دائم تحریف میشه.
ولی به نظرم کنترل وقتی خطرناکتره که شبیه آزادی باشه.یه جایی خوندم که خطرناکترین زندان، زندانیه که زندانیهاش ازش راضی باشن.
در نهایت اگه کنترل باعث خوشبختی بشه، آیا باید قبولش کنیم؟
کتاب داستان روان و خوبی داشت و شخصیت اصلی خوب پرداخت شده بود. داستان واقعا خوب بود و قسمت پایانی هم برام جالب بود و چرخش جالبی داشت ولی بازم از نظر شخصی و حسم به کتاب نمیتونم بهش امتیاز کامل رو بدم. خیلی وقتا فکر میکنم دارم سخت میگیرم :))) ولی جا داشت بهتر باشه.
شخصیتهای فرعی خیلی سطحی بودن و همون بخش آخر کتاب میتونست بهتر باشه.
البته ترجمه کتاب هم یه جاهایی یه ایرادای عجیبی داشت. انگار یه گوگل ترنسلیت قدیمی بعضی قسمتاش رو ترجمه کرده. واقعا ایراد ابتدایی بود که چند بارم تکرار شد ولی میشه کتاب رو خوند و اوکیه و من پیشنهادش میکنم.
4.5/5⭐
December 5, 2012
I'm not writing this review for anyone other than my nerd friends that check my Goodreads page, so don't be surprised by my lack of literary genius...
I'll only spoil the one thing that should be spoiled- and it's the same one thing that everyone references. The main character (Chip) ends up raping the woman he's in love with (Lilac) to prove to her that she's being brainwashed by the government and to get her to trust him. Reading a lackluster book for three days only to discover that you hate the character whose perspective you're watching the story from, quite frankly, sucks. I can't believe that the sole person who has decided to "make the world a better place" is also a character that never learns about true love, being a father, and the safety of his friends and family. There was no hero in this tale.
The story takes place over the course of 30 years, and I stopped liking the character when he was 9.
I'll only spoil the one thing that should be spoiled- and it's the same one thing that everyone references. The main character (Chip) ends up raping the woman he's in love with (Lilac) to prove to her that she's being brainwashed by the government and to get her to trust him. Reading a lackluster book for three days only to discover that you hate the character whose perspective you're watching the story from, quite frankly, sucks. I can't believe that the sole person who has decided to "make the world a better place" is also a character that never learns about true love, being a father, and the safety of his friends and family. There was no hero in this tale.
The story takes place over the course of 30 years, and I stopped liking the character when he was 9.
December 2, 2011
Christ, Marx, Wood and Wei- dystopian future world child's bouncing song
Led us to this perfect day
Marx, Wood, Wei and Christ
All but Marx were sacrificed
Wood, Wei, Christ and Marx
Gave us lovely schools and parks
Wei, Christ, Marx and Wood
Made us humble, made us good.
September 15, 2026
Being alive and experiencing emotions up and down, even the right to be unhappy if you want, mood swings, joys and heartbreaks, human feelings rather than a machine of moderately consistent servitude, the right to be an individual instead of a drone, is our absolute right.
Ira Levin gets this aspect of dystopia spot on, but with so much potential this is a strangely unfulfilling and badly planned out book mostly because the main character, Chip, is an increasingly dislikeable and disagreeable asshole!
The more he tastes "freedom" the more ruthless he becomes, while, as a reader, you're still trying to sympathize with him as a nice guy.
And if you don't believe in the mission and plausibility of the main character, coupled with poor pacing and odd jolts in plot advancement instead of smooth transitioning, you're doomed.
The immaturity and constant references to sex are unrealistic, weirdly unsexy and awkward too.
Ira Levin is a clever author, though, who instills revulsion at a future AI-controlled society, but in this book comes across as old-fashioned, crusty, reclusive and misogynistic, as though it's okay to accept male character turdism because, after all, they're fighting against the oppressive machine.
The concept is fine, but the execution is not, with poor pacing, too many implausibilities, a chucked together plot, dislikeable characters, and an overall feeling that an AI-controlled society where everyone is equal (clones if you like), with similar pay, interests and social lives is not that bad at all! And that's a fail when you can't sympathize with the revolution because it favors poverty, disease and decrepitude.
Isn't it better to live a short life with "attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion, C-beams glittering in the dark near the Tannhäuser Gate, moments to be lost in time like tears in rain." (Blade Runner) than 60 years of mundane existence? Off course it is, but 60 years of "orgy-porgy" (Brave New World) is preferable to what's offered as an alternative in This Perfect Day.
Ira Levin knows how to do subtle intrigue wonderfully well, but isn't so good at pacey action as you rarely feel in the thick of it but left on the outside looking in, in a rather dodgy thriller that doesn't work.
There's also an extreme sex scene halfway through that's baffling because of the way they carry on as though nothing even happened! This reinforces the sensation of assholery, implausibility and disbelief.
No chemistry or passion, just mechanically awkward fucking, no real happiness or joy, humor or laughs, just dry and nasty lubelessness.
This Perfect Day is increasingly annoying!
My guess is the immediate fame and fortune of Rosemary's Baby in 1967 had a negative impact on the focus of this weirdly disjointed and badly constructed novel, which is a surprise in comparison to Ira Levin's normally high standards.
What a pity, but they can't all be winners.
Ira Levin gets this aspect of dystopia spot on, but with so much potential this is a strangely unfulfilling and badly planned out book mostly because the main character, Chip, is an increasingly dislikeable and disagreeable asshole!
The more he tastes "freedom" the more ruthless he becomes, while, as a reader, you're still trying to sympathize with him as a nice guy.
And if you don't believe in the mission and plausibility of the main character, coupled with poor pacing and odd jolts in plot advancement instead of smooth transitioning, you're doomed.
The immaturity and constant references to sex are unrealistic, weirdly unsexy and awkward too.
Ira Levin is a clever author, though, who instills revulsion at a future AI-controlled society, but in this book comes across as old-fashioned, crusty, reclusive and misogynistic, as though it's okay to accept male character turdism because, after all, they're fighting against the oppressive machine.
The concept is fine, but the execution is not, with poor pacing, too many implausibilities, a chucked together plot, dislikeable characters, and an overall feeling that an AI-controlled society where everyone is equal (clones if you like), with similar pay, interests and social lives is not that bad at all! And that's a fail when you can't sympathize with the revolution because it favors poverty, disease and decrepitude.
Isn't it better to live a short life with "attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion, C-beams glittering in the dark near the Tannhäuser Gate, moments to be lost in time like tears in rain." (Blade Runner) than 60 years of mundane existence? Off course it is, but 60 years of "orgy-porgy" (Brave New World) is preferable to what's offered as an alternative in This Perfect Day.
Ira Levin knows how to do subtle intrigue wonderfully well, but isn't so good at pacey action as you rarely feel in the thick of it but left on the outside looking in, in a rather dodgy thriller that doesn't work.
There's also an extreme sex scene halfway through that's baffling because of the way they carry on as though nothing even happened! This reinforces the sensation of assholery, implausibility and disbelief.
No chemistry or passion, just mechanically awkward fucking, no real happiness or joy, humor or laughs, just dry and nasty lubelessness.
This Perfect Day is increasingly annoying!
My guess is the immediate fame and fortune of Rosemary's Baby in 1967 had a negative impact on the focus of this weirdly disjointed and badly constructed novel, which is a surprise in comparison to Ira Levin's normally high standards.
What a pity, but they can't all be winners.
May 29, 2023
Relectura.
Una distopía que ha envejecido bien.
Dice la sinopsis:
Su nombre es Li RM35M4419, pero se hace llamar Chip. Era un miembro feliz de una sociedad perfecta, la Familia. Recibía un tratamiento cada mes, gozaba de sexo una vez a la semana, aceptaba con alegría los trabajos que le adjudicaban, tenia cubiertas todas sus necesidades con sólo solicitarlas, aunque a veces le fueran concedidas y otras no. Vivía en una sociedad donde no existían el odio, ni la violencia, donde cualquier actitud agresiva era alegremente denunciada y el hermano enfermo ayudado inmediatamente. Era un mundo perfecto hecho de una sucesión de días perfectos. Pero, en ese mundo perfecto de seres uniformemente perfectos, Chip sufría una imperfección: uno de sus ojos era castaño y el otro verde. Quizá fuera por eso que se iniciara en él la rebeldía, la búsqueda de una libertad mas perfecta…., en el seno de un mundo estremecedoramente utópico cuya profunda verosimilitud ha sido comparada con 1984 y Un mundo feliz.
Mis impresiones.
Estamos ante una distopía clásica. Bebe en las fuentes de 1984 y un mundo feliz. No es tan buena como esos dos clásicos del genéro, pero aporta su granito de originalidad. De hecho, tras las dos obras citadas, que marcan la diferencia, es de lo mejor en distopías de ese estilo que he leído.
Está dividida en cuatro partes centradas en la vida de Chip, el protagonista. La manera en la que Ira Levin, describe esa sociedad sin parar la acción es notable. El ritmo es vivo y si nos gusta el género, la novela engancha desde el principio. Cuenta, además con un par de giros bien colocados, que sorprenden y contribuyen a mantener el interés.
La trama me ha puesto los pelos de punta más hoy que cuando la leí por primera vez. En aquel entonces me parecía imposible que algo así pudiera llegar a suceder. Hoy en día, aunque no exactamente de la manera que describe el libro, sí suena mucho más probable.
La sociedad en la que Chip vive ha eliminado la individualidad, la creatividad y el libre albedrío en aras de una "convivencia" pacífica, productiva y sin emociones. Todos los aspectos de la vida los controla una computadora "UNI", que es la que determina el destino de cada miembro de la sociedad. En este contexto, Chip, se va a rebelar en busca de una vida más plena.
Los personajes están bien. Por un lado tenemos a Chip y a su abuelo, los digamos reticentes al sistema, que son los mejor trazados. Chip es el que más evoluciona. Pasa de conformista a cuestionarse algunos porqués primero, para posicionarse finalmente como rebelde e insurrecto. En contraposición con ellos, el resto de la la familia del protagonista, a los que conoceremos en la primera parte de la novela, son todo lo contrario, miembros "felices y adaptados" del nuevo orden. El grupo de "rebeldes sin causa", que contactan con Chip, representan la queja pasiva, ese estar en disconformidad, pero sin querer pasar a la acción.
El final es correcto, aunque para mi gusto le faltan hojas.
En conclusión. Una distopía de corte clásico, que se mueve a buen ritmo, engancha y entretiene. Recomendable a los amantes del género.
Una distopía que ha envejecido bien.
Dice la sinopsis:
Su nombre es Li RM35M4419, pero se hace llamar Chip. Era un miembro feliz de una sociedad perfecta, la Familia. Recibía un tratamiento cada mes, gozaba de sexo una vez a la semana, aceptaba con alegría los trabajos que le adjudicaban, tenia cubiertas todas sus necesidades con sólo solicitarlas, aunque a veces le fueran concedidas y otras no. Vivía en una sociedad donde no existían el odio, ni la violencia, donde cualquier actitud agresiva era alegremente denunciada y el hermano enfermo ayudado inmediatamente. Era un mundo perfecto hecho de una sucesión de días perfectos. Pero, en ese mundo perfecto de seres uniformemente perfectos, Chip sufría una imperfección: uno de sus ojos era castaño y el otro verde. Quizá fuera por eso que se iniciara en él la rebeldía, la búsqueda de una libertad mas perfecta…., en el seno de un mundo estremecedoramente utópico cuya profunda verosimilitud ha sido comparada con 1984 y Un mundo feliz.
Mis impresiones.
Estamos ante una distopía clásica. Bebe en las fuentes de 1984 y un mundo feliz. No es tan buena como esos dos clásicos del genéro, pero aporta su granito de originalidad. De hecho, tras las dos obras citadas, que marcan la diferencia, es de lo mejor en distopías de ese estilo que he leído.
Está dividida en cuatro partes centradas en la vida de Chip, el protagonista. La manera en la que Ira Levin, describe esa sociedad sin parar la acción es notable. El ritmo es vivo y si nos gusta el género, la novela engancha desde el principio. Cuenta, además con un par de giros bien colocados, que sorprenden y contribuyen a mantener el interés.
La trama me ha puesto los pelos de punta más hoy que cuando la leí por primera vez. En aquel entonces me parecía imposible que algo así pudiera llegar a suceder. Hoy en día, aunque no exactamente de la manera que describe el libro, sí suena mucho más probable.
La sociedad en la que Chip vive ha eliminado la individualidad, la creatividad y el libre albedrío en aras de una "convivencia" pacífica, productiva y sin emociones. Todos los aspectos de la vida los controla una computadora "UNI", que es la que determina el destino de cada miembro de la sociedad. En este contexto, Chip, se va a rebelar en busca de una vida más plena.
Los personajes están bien. Por un lado tenemos a Chip y a su abuelo, los digamos reticentes al sistema, que son los mejor trazados. Chip es el que más evoluciona. Pasa de conformista a cuestionarse algunos porqués primero, para posicionarse finalmente como rebelde e insurrecto. En contraposición con ellos, el resto de la la familia del protagonista, a los que conoceremos en la primera parte de la novela, son todo lo contrario, miembros "felices y adaptados" del nuevo orden. El grupo de "rebeldes sin causa", que contactan con Chip, representan la queja pasiva, ese estar en disconformidad, pero sin querer pasar a la acción.
El final es correcto, aunque para mi gusto le faltan hojas.
En conclusión. Una distopía de corte clásico, que se mueve a buen ritmo, engancha y entretiene. Recomendable a los amantes del género.
January 4, 2015
I think it is impossible to review this book and not mention 1984, Brave New World, We and Kallocain. Levin's book fares well in this company as I think this is one of his best.
One mighty family
A single perfect breed
Free of all selfishness
Aggressiveness and greed
Each member giving
All he has to give
And getting back
All he needs to live
Christ, Marx, Wei and Wood
Made us humble, made us good
Christ, Marx, Wood and Wei
Lead us to this perfect day
One mighty family
A single perfect breed
Free of all selfishness
Aggressiveness and greed
Each member giving
All he has to give
And getting back
All he needs to live
Christ, Marx, Wei and Wood
Made us humble, made us good
Christ, Marx, Wood and Wei
Lead us to this perfect day
April 29, 2025
Ist sehr lange her, damals hab ich nach allem gegriffen, das irgendwie nach Dystopie ausgesehen hat. In diesem Fall war es aber eher ein enttäuschendes Leseerlebnis, schlecht geschrieben, ziemlich hanebüchener Plot, aber immerhin ausreichend spannend um es fertig zu lesen.
April 6, 2017
“Being happy or unhappy - is that really the most important thing? Knowing the truth would be a different kind of happiness - a more satisfying kind, I think, even if it turned out to be a sad kind.”
― Ira Levin, This Perfect Day
DNF.
I am soo sorry to give an Ira Levin book a 2. I LOVE Levin . I feel tempted to change my rating.
SPOILERS:
It did not FEEL like a Levin book though. I was baffled reading this. And I should not say I did not finish this. I did. But with the help of alot of skimming.
The book was very dry. I could not get involved and I not only love Levin I love Dystopian..which makes me wonder If I missed something.
The rape scene turned me off as I am sure it did many. I was disturbed by the roles in society women played here.
But none of those reasons justify a 2 rating. All I c an say is I tried on many occasions to read this and the dryness of the writing and slowness of the pacing made my eyes get heavy. I know people who love this book. I just could not get nor stay involved.
I still recommend it because I looked at some reviews and this really seems one that has a great array of opinons. Plus I still love 90 percent of Levin's work. Just not this book.
― Ira Levin, This Perfect Day
DNF.
I am soo sorry to give an Ira Levin book a 2. I LOVE Levin . I feel tempted to change my rating.
SPOILERS:
It did not FEEL like a Levin book though. I was baffled reading this. And I should not say I did not finish this. I did. But with the help of alot of skimming.
The book was very dry. I could not get involved and I not only love Levin I love Dystopian..which makes me wonder If I missed something.
The rape scene turned me off as I am sure it did many. I was disturbed by the roles in society women played here.
But none of those reasons justify a 2 rating. All I c an say is I tried on many occasions to read this and the dryness of the writing and slowness of the pacing made my eyes get heavy. I know people who love this book. I just could not get nor stay involved.
I still recommend it because I looked at some reviews and this really seems one that has a great array of opinons. Plus I still love 90 percent of Levin's work. Just not this book.
October 17, 2017
I listened to this with my husband on a long car journey. We enjoyed it! It was fast-paced and engaging and thought provoking, but I had some ISSUES with it.
*spoiler warning for those who care*
The theme of a perfect utopia which turns out to be a sinister dystopia, where people are being disposed of down waste chutes as soon as they stop being useful and nobody is Truly Free, is a bit of a science fiction cliché. Even in the 70s it’d been done many times before, but I don’t think that matters, as long as the author puts a different spin on it.
My main issue was the relationship between Chip & Lilac. ‘Problematic’ is putting it mildly. He claimed to be in love with her but I thought his feelings seemed more like obsession, especially as he tended to focus a lot more on her appearance (e.g. her ‘rose-brown’ skin and ‘conical’(??) breasts) than her personality. She made it very clear on multiple occasions that she did not love him, and in fact was in love with someone else, but that didn’t deter him, heck no. After he kidnapped her it started to become obvious that he expected & felt he was owed sex. Wasn’t she grateful about how he’d RESCUED her?? I mean, it was at gunpoint, with violence and threats, but that was necessary. Plus, he'd spouted his feelings at her and told her about how much he loved her, and on two occasions he hadn’t even raped her when he could have! What was she WAITING for?? When she still steadfastly refused to sleep with him I knew what would happen next, and sure enough. Afterwards he rather reluctantly apologized, while explaining how it wasn't really his fault. She agreed, forgave him, requested sex the very next day, then... no I'm not kidding about any of this... fell in love with him and eventually married him.
What. The. Heck.
I could NOT believe it. I kept holding out hope that she was just playing along and waiting until he was asleep so she could stab him in the kidney, but nada. After they got married she pretty much turned into a submissive housewifey who got pregnant, did the dishes, sewed the clothes, and patted Chip on the back consolingly when he got drunk and embarrassed her at parties. He barely noticed when they had a baby, although of course it had to be named after HIS grandaddy. He was too busy planning his heroic mission, which he did against Lilac's wishes and without consulting her about anything. When she ventured a sensible (and correct, as it turned out) doubt about the plans, he patronisingly dismissed her and told her everything was fine, then worried about it secretly because she totally had a point. Also, near the end, as part of his cunning plan to play along with the programmers, he slept his way around the entire colony including two 16 year old girls at the same time on his first night (he is 37), which I’M SUPER DUPER SURE was a necessary evil, nobly done against his wishes in order to make sure nobody suspected him.
So yeah. I had, like, minus a billion sympathy for this guy, which is perhaps another reason why I found it hard to accept him as a hero.
Was he meant to be a hero? My husband thought maybe the entire novel was intentionally ironic. I’m not sure. It’s possible, but my feeling is that it’s not. I think Chip is genuinely meant to be the ultimate Defender of Freedom of Choice, the only one who can see things the 'right' way. Not just smart enough to escape from drugged oblivion in UniComp, not just a skilled leader and planner who can orchestrate a successful attack on Uni from Liberty island, but also principled enough to withstand being corrupted by the fabulous luxury of the programmers lifestyle! Even being offered basically eternal life in paradise, he STILL fights for the freedom of the human race.
Whether he’s supposed to be or not, we don’t think he IS a hero. He's quite mad, and evil! A megalomaniac, far worse than Wei. So convinced he knows what's best for everyone that he feels qualified to make decisions on behalf of the population of the entire world. He believes the system is corrupt and wrong, so instead of trying to fix it or make it better, he just chucks a bomb into the central hub, deliberately, knowing full well that worldwide chaos, anarchy, war, murder, starvation and BILLIONS OF DEATHS will result. Oh well, I'm sure they'll sort themselves out, right? Not Chip's problem! He's going to nip off back to the island in his chopper so he can sleep with his wife and ignore his baby again, happy in the knowledge that everyone in the world is now Better Off, by his estimation, even if they don't realise it.
He was in a position of power in the programmers group, and could quite conceivably have used that to slowly influence things for the better, to campaign for alteration of the things he saw as wrong, such as euthanizing everyone at 62. At the very LEAST he could have overthrown Wei and taken control himself, if he’s so sure he’s got it right. Wei’s system was corrupt, yes, but it was a functioning, peaceful society free from hunger and pain. Maybe Tom and I are both secret evil commie overlords, but we kind of agreed with a lot of Wei’s decisions, and felt with a few tweaks UniComp could actually have achieved a true utopia. Obviously there were some big problems, but by golly they had SOME things right. No sickness, ever, for the whole world's population! That's amazing! Everyone single person in the world has enough to eat, clothes to wear, and a warm clean place to sleep! Also amazing! Is population planning really too high a price to pay for that?
So yeah, although it aggravated me a little that Chip’s point of view was presented as morally correct and heroic, I liked the fact that other points of view were also introduced. Chip did have some conversations with Wei (and others) where they discussed the ethics of world leadership, freedom and control. The book raised a lot of interesting theoretical points about the way the world is and the way it could be or might be under different circumstances, which we really enjoyed discussing.
*spoiler warning for those who care*
The theme of a perfect utopia which turns out to be a sinister dystopia, where people are being disposed of down waste chutes as soon as they stop being useful and nobody is Truly Free, is a bit of a science fiction cliché. Even in the 70s it’d been done many times before, but I don’t think that matters, as long as the author puts a different spin on it.
My main issue was the relationship between Chip & Lilac. ‘Problematic’ is putting it mildly. He claimed to be in love with her but I thought his feelings seemed more like obsession, especially as he tended to focus a lot more on her appearance (e.g. her ‘rose-brown’ skin and ‘conical’(??) breasts) than her personality. She made it very clear on multiple occasions that she did not love him, and in fact was in love with someone else, but that didn’t deter him, heck no. After he kidnapped her it started to become obvious that he expected & felt he was owed sex. Wasn’t she grateful about how he’d RESCUED her?? I mean, it was at gunpoint, with violence and threats, but that was necessary. Plus, he'd spouted his feelings at her and told her about how much he loved her, and on two occasions he hadn’t even raped her when he could have! What was she WAITING for?? When she still steadfastly refused to sleep with him I knew what would happen next, and sure enough. Afterwards he rather reluctantly apologized, while explaining how it wasn't really his fault. She agreed, forgave him, requested sex the very next day, then... no I'm not kidding about any of this... fell in love with him and eventually married him.
What. The. Heck.
I could NOT believe it. I kept holding out hope that she was just playing along and waiting until he was asleep so she could stab him in the kidney, but nada. After they got married she pretty much turned into a submissive housewifey who got pregnant, did the dishes, sewed the clothes, and patted Chip on the back consolingly when he got drunk and embarrassed her at parties. He barely noticed when they had a baby, although of course it had to be named after HIS grandaddy. He was too busy planning his heroic mission, which he did against Lilac's wishes and without consulting her about anything. When she ventured a sensible (and correct, as it turned out) doubt about the plans, he patronisingly dismissed her and told her everything was fine, then worried about it secretly because she totally had a point. Also, near the end, as part of his cunning plan to play along with the programmers, he slept his way around the entire colony including two 16 year old girls at the same time on his first night (he is 37), which I’M SUPER DUPER SURE was a necessary evil, nobly done against his wishes in order to make sure nobody suspected him.
So yeah. I had, like, minus a billion sympathy for this guy, which is perhaps another reason why I found it hard to accept him as a hero.
Was he meant to be a hero? My husband thought maybe the entire novel was intentionally ironic. I’m not sure. It’s possible, but my feeling is that it’s not. I think Chip is genuinely meant to be the ultimate Defender of Freedom of Choice, the only one who can see things the 'right' way. Not just smart enough to escape from drugged oblivion in UniComp, not just a skilled leader and planner who can orchestrate a successful attack on Uni from Liberty island, but also principled enough to withstand being corrupted by the fabulous luxury of the programmers lifestyle! Even being offered basically eternal life in paradise, he STILL fights for the freedom of the human race.
Whether he’s supposed to be or not, we don’t think he IS a hero. He's quite mad, and evil! A megalomaniac, far worse than Wei. So convinced he knows what's best for everyone that he feels qualified to make decisions on behalf of the population of the entire world. He believes the system is corrupt and wrong, so instead of trying to fix it or make it better, he just chucks a bomb into the central hub, deliberately, knowing full well that worldwide chaos, anarchy, war, murder, starvation and BILLIONS OF DEATHS will result. Oh well, I'm sure they'll sort themselves out, right? Not Chip's problem! He's going to nip off back to the island in his chopper so he can sleep with his wife and ignore his baby again, happy in the knowledge that everyone in the world is now Better Off, by his estimation, even if they don't realise it.
He was in a position of power in the programmers group, and could quite conceivably have used that to slowly influence things for the better, to campaign for alteration of the things he saw as wrong, such as euthanizing everyone at 62. At the very LEAST he could have overthrown Wei and taken control himself, if he’s so sure he’s got it right. Wei’s system was corrupt, yes, but it was a functioning, peaceful society free from hunger and pain. Maybe Tom and I are both secret evil commie overlords, but we kind of agreed with a lot of Wei’s decisions, and felt with a few tweaks UniComp could actually have achieved a true utopia. Obviously there were some big problems, but by golly they had SOME things right. No sickness, ever, for the whole world's population! That's amazing! Everyone single person in the world has enough to eat, clothes to wear, and a warm clean place to sleep! Also amazing! Is population planning really too high a price to pay for that?
So yeah, although it aggravated me a little that Chip’s point of view was presented as morally correct and heroic, I liked the fact that other points of view were also introduced. Chip did have some conversations with Wei (and others) where they discussed the ethics of world leadership, freedom and control. The book raised a lot of interesting theoretical points about the way the world is and the way it could be or might be under different circumstances, which we really enjoyed discussing.
November 29, 2014
"You are only partly alive. We can help you more than you can imagine."
I had never heard of this book before it was selected for an SFF Audio Readalong discussion, and I think I liked it more after we talked about it for an hour or so.
There is a lot to think about here. The novel is in four sections and quite a bit of it has hints of other dystopias - the community with scheduled sex and neighbor-reporting is similar to We, the drugging of society feels like Brave New World, and I was completely expecting it to go in the direction of the ending of 1984.
This book won the Prometheus Award from the Libertarian Futurist Society for examining concepts of freedom. Hmm, I have read 18 books from their list. What does that mean?
But that may be the most interesting part of the novel, or at least what I was thinking about while reading it. Many people rate the book low because of the rape scene, and while it feels gratuitous in the moment, I actually think it is our first huge clue that Chip is a questionable hero. What is he going to do if he overthrows Uni? Would he be someone to follow? And what is worse, knowing the truth or living a passive, expected life?
And one little quote, one I felt very deeply considering recent events:
"We’ve got to fight, not adjust. Fight, fight, fight."
I had never heard of this book before it was selected for an SFF Audio Readalong discussion, and I think I liked it more after we talked about it for an hour or so.
There is a lot to think about here. The novel is in four sections and quite a bit of it has hints of other dystopias - the community with scheduled sex and neighbor-reporting is similar to We, the drugging of society feels like Brave New World, and I was completely expecting it to go in the direction of the ending of 1984.
This book won the Prometheus Award from the Libertarian Futurist Society for examining concepts of freedom. Hmm, I have read 18 books from their list. What does that mean?
But that may be the most interesting part of the novel, or at least what I was thinking about while reading it. Many people rate the book low because of the rape scene, and while it feels gratuitous in the moment, I actually think it is our first huge clue that Chip is a questionable hero. What is he going to do if he overthrows Uni? Would he be someone to follow? And what is worse, knowing the truth or living a passive, expected life?
And one little quote, one I felt very deeply considering recent events:
"We’ve got to fight, not adjust. Fight, fight, fight."
August 23, 2011
*sigh* I love this book. I recommend this book to people when they ask me for a sci-fi suggestion & I'm assuming they've read the ABC's (that's Asimov, Bradbury, and Clarke) and perhaps haven't been introduced to Levin. This is oft-compared to "1984" and "Brave New World" -- and I could rave about "Brave New World," especially since this was originally published in the 1970s so it wasn't breaking into the same future-predicting, but for some reason, this story & Chip (the main character) spoke to me more. I was originally introduced to this book in seventh grade by my social studies teacher at the time. I was goofing off in class because I was usually ahead in the material & bored, so he held me after class one day and gave me his copy of this book & told me to read it as an extra credit assignment & write something up about what I thought about it, and any themes I saw in it. I think I read it twice before I gave it back to him, and wrote up a much longer paper than he expected :)
I re-read this the other day because someone recently asked me what it was about, and I could only give a vague outline, though of course I raved about it generally. And so I thought, "Well hey I should probably read this again to make sure it still stands as something I'd want to recommend to people." And, yes, it still does.
I re-read this the other day because someone recently asked me what it was about, and I could only give a vague outline, though of course I raved about it generally. And so I thought, "Well hey I should probably read this again to make sure it still stands as something I'd want to recommend to people." And, yes, it still does.
August 9, 2010
This is one of my absolute favorite books of all time. Do yourself and favor and read it if you haven't before. I pick it up and reread it every couple of years, and I think I always notice something new in the story....but that may just be because my view on life changes over the years, and thus I come at it from a different approach.
It is very much in the vein of other books that deal with the concept of a futuristic dystopian world, i.e, Brave New World, 1984, and Logan's Run.
It was out OOP for several years, and after reading (and losing) my mother's copy when I was a teenager....I scoured used books stores for YEARS before I finally stumbled on a paperback version. A few years later, I also came across an original first run hardcover edition from 1970. It is one of my favorite possessions. :D
It is very much in the vein of other books that deal with the concept of a futuristic dystopian world, i.e, Brave New World, 1984, and Logan's Run.
It was out OOP for several years, and after reading (and losing) my mother's copy when I was a teenager....I scoured used books stores for YEARS before I finally stumbled on a paperback version. A few years later, I also came across an original first run hardcover edition from 1970. It is one of my favorite possessions. :D
March 21, 2017
Una distopía clásica con toques de sus antecesoras 1984 o Un mundo feliz. La he leído en dos sentadas porque me ha resultado muy amena pero hay algunas cosas que para mi gusto restan, la principal la motivación del protagonista. Pese a esas cosas, lo bueno gana y se lleva 4 estrellas.
June 26, 2008
I'm surprised at the low rating many have given this classic.
What makes This Perfect Day a must read is not just a well-crafted, twisting plot and setting, but the depth of the main character. The author reveals him to us gradually -- as the character becomes less drugged/more cogent, we know and care about him even more.
The style of writing, although in the past tense and 3rd person, achieves an immediacy that transports the reader to the setting and action as it happens. For instance, as Chip, the protagonist gets lost in the beauty of woman; another character (her boyfriend) interrupts Chip's "thoughts" and our vision. It's a humorous and subtle style that you don't find often. And it is very effective in the pacing and telling of the story.
In short, there are many sci-fi/fantasy books that tell a good story. This Perfect Day, however, is a masterpiece of the genre. Take it to the beach or read it on a rainy weekend. You won't be disappointed.
What makes This Perfect Day a must read is not just a well-crafted, twisting plot and setting, but the depth of the main character. The author reveals him to us gradually -- as the character becomes less drugged/more cogent, we know and care about him even more.
The style of writing, although in the past tense and 3rd person, achieves an immediacy that transports the reader to the setting and action as it happens. For instance, as Chip, the protagonist gets lost in the beauty of woman; another character (her boyfriend) interrupts Chip's "thoughts" and our vision. It's a humorous and subtle style that you don't find often. And it is very effective in the pacing and telling of the story.
In short, there are many sci-fi/fantasy books that tell a good story. This Perfect Day, however, is a masterpiece of the genre. Take it to the beach or read it on a rainy weekend. You won't be disappointed.
April 19, 2015
A ripoff of Brave New World, only with more racism, heteronormativity, and rape. Seriously, all the drugged dull masses are tan-skinned, slant- eyed communists, and the ~truly alive aware hero of this story and his first love interest are unusual for having white features (pale skin and 1 green eye). The protagonist kidnaps a woman he's obsessed with, rapes her, and afterwards she tells him "don't feel bad about it, it was natural, you woke me up," and she becomes his pregnant nagging housewife and spends her afternoons sewing baby clothes. Like I said, there's not even any new ideas in here that weren't covered by Brave New World 40 years earlier, don't waste your time with this one.
January 23, 2025
This is the first time I have not loved something by Ira Levin.
February 11, 2024
کتاب درباره آرمانشهری است که توسط ابرکامپیوتری به نام یونی کامپ اداره می شود. یونی درباره آینده و زندگی همه انسان ها تصمیم گیری می کند و انسان ها هم به واسطه تزریق موادی که در فواصل معین انجام می شود از این وضعیت بسیار راضی و خوشحال هستند.
داستان بسیار روان ، ترجمه خوب و چاپ کم اشتباه باعث شد که امتیاز خوبی را بشه بهش داد.
داستان بسیار روان ، ترجمه خوب و چاپ کم اشتباه باعث شد که امتیاز خوبی را بشه بهش داد.
June 11, 2012
I’ll admit right up front that I’m not a fan of dystopian fiction. However, I am a fan of Ira Levin (both his novels and his plays). “This Perfect Day” was published in 1970 – after his play “Dr Cook’s Garden” (1967) and before his novels “The Stepford Wives” (1972) and “The Boys from Brazil” (1978). I site these three works because they too deal with issues of creating the “perfect” society through euthanasia, genetic engineering or cloning.
Set far in the future the entire world is under the control of Uni – a computer programed with a mix of philosophical dogma based on Christianity and Marxism among others. Everyone is drugged with a lithium cocktail to ensure domestic harmony. No one ever gets too angry, horny or overjoyed, and everyone is equal. Docility is the objective. A society where no one lives past the age of sixty-two (the optimum age to die); everyone eats and drinks the same things, look basically the same (everyone’s complexion is the same and all are approximately the same height and weight) and has passionless sex once a week (hetero only). All needs are provided – shelter, food, and healthcare. All members of the family are classified to determine their vocation, and a pre-determined few are allowed to have children.
Anyone with a reasonable degree of intelligence will be able to guess where this story is headed. Yes, rebellion. Our hero “Chip” would rather think for himself, express himself…feel more. I’m not going to reveal more.
Of the four works mentioned above, “This Perfect Day” is my least favourite. It lacks the tight construction of the aforementioned works. The author falls into the narrative trap of needless reiteration; belabouring his points to the brink of tedium. I say brink because just when you’re ready to hurl the book across the room, its forward momentum kicks in again. Now, that sounds harsh…though I didn’t love the book, I did find the story interesting and thought provoking. So, is it worth reading? Certainly; especially to those who don’t mind protracted narratives, the redundant expression of ideas or who simply fancy dystopian stories.
Displaying 1 - 30 of 1,105 reviews