I get hooked to reading this book because of rare combination of value investing and Austrian economics school. This book has a good introduction with long reading list for both. But the most interesting part was about Parames' investment process.
Some quotes:
The stocks with the highest weights, over 5%, should command our total confidence to avoid a risk of serious damage. The riskiest bets should be kept to a prudent size, never more than 1-2%
We have almost always steered clear of structured products. They are hard to understand and you feel as though you are being charged hidden costs.
There are very few companies able to maintain a durable competitive advantage. Nearly all sectors end up revering towards a reasonable return on capital, which is neither high nor low - between 5% and 10%.
Do not take costs as given. This is a common error when looking at commodity or cyclical companies or companies with novel products.
Volatility is not the best measure of risk. The risk of an investment is the possibility of a permanent loss of purchasing power as a result of making an error of judgement
On Discount rate:
my best alternative investment has always been the funds i have directly managed.
The logic behind price momentum is that if you buy a stock with is already starting to rise then the opportunity cost is lower, reducing the time spent waiting for the rest of the market to wake up to the opportunity. This waiting time is the biggest problem for value investors, because we have a natural impulse to buy too soon and sell too early. In any case, for somebody accustomed to buying shares when they are on the way down, it feels counterintuitive to buy what is rising, making it a challenge to apply this price momentum strategy.
Experience ultimately teaches us that many of these cheap stocks are to be found in challenging sectors or subject major competitiveness challenges, and in the long term can remain eternal duds. Time is NOT on our side with such stocks, since the returns on capital are low and the potential upside is slow to materialize and uncertain. The balance sheet isn't everything.
Cyclical companies. This is probably the easiest and least risky way to find opportunities. Economic cycles need to be tolerated with enormous patience, but it's a reassurance to know that a falling share price is solely a cyclical effect and not due to some unknown competitiveness factor. Cycles always turn around. This means opportunities here are simple to analyze, as we already know what's driving the movement.
The biggest error with the cycle is trying to predict the exact point of inflection, which is a total waste of time. The crucial point is to keep buying throughout the fall, since the best results are obtained from the last investments that are made.
Once we have eventually uncovered some quality stocks which we feel comfortable with, we can begin to increase their concentration in our portfolio. It is vital to diversify the portfolio among minimum number of stocks. The exact figure is not important, although five to six stocks would be a bare minimum. The total number of stocks in the portfolio will depend on how much knowledge we acquire on different companies, but without going beyond a reasonable number, say 15 to 25.
Companies to avoid:
1. Companies with an excessive growth focus.
2. companies which are constantly acquiring other companies.
3. IPO
4. Bsns which are still in their infancy.
5. Companies with opaque accounting
6. Companies with key employees. investment banks, law firms, headhunters..
7. Highly indebted companies.
it’s far better to have a good understand- ing of the business and be able to determine a particular company’s capacity to generate future earnings. The goal is not to precisely forecast earnings each year, but rather to set out a logical range in which they are likely to move according to the business’s characteristics. Doing so requires reading, delving into the companies, asking, learning, and reflecting; not constructing complicated models.
Once we have a figure for normalised earnings (i.e. under stable market conditions – neither boom nor crisis) we can apply an appropriate multiple and arrive at our valuation. Discounting cash flows is a neat stylistic exercise, but adds little to the valuation.
The multiple to apply to these normalised earnings will depend on the quality of the business. A very reasonable – and probably the most suitable – approach is to use the stock market average for the last 200 years.
This average is 15, which is equivalent to an ‘earning yield’ of 6.6% (1 × 100/15), in line with the long-term real return on equities. Setting this as a target return seems pretty sensible. For some outstanding businesses we could apply a somewhat higher margin of between 15 and 20; while for more mediocre businesses, with limited barriers to entry, we should push it down to between 10 and 15. For most businesses, 15 is an appropriate multiple.
Once we have performed the valuation, we should invest where we find the largest discounts relative to this target valuation, calculated according to the multiple. Other qualitative factors will also influence the investment deci- sion, the most important one being the quality of the business and – closely related to that – our confidence in the valuation we have performed. Quality and confidence will help us decide the appropriate weight for each stock in the portfolio.
The economic cycle. Highly cyclical companies will never be in a stable situation, since the ups and downs of the cycle make it hard to know what ‘normal’ earnings look like. It’s not about predicting the cycle, rather it comes down to understanding where we are right now, which may be an extreme, good, bad, or plain normal situation. There are var- ious different methods we can use to adjust earnings in the face of this difficulty: taking the average of results over the last 10 years, adjust- ing for inflation; taking maximum and minimum earnings over the last 10 years and using the mid-point; or any other commonsense criteria.
am constantly tweaking the weights of my stocks according to their performance. If I have positions in two stocks and one goes up by 20% and the other falls by 20%, I almost automatically sell positions in the first to allow me to reinvest in the second.
When we come across an undervalued company which repurchases its shares, we are looking at the only catalyst under the direct influence of the company and its shareholders
In summary, the perfect stock is a preferred share in a medium-size company with a family holding company structure, trading on the wrong market, with a cyclical component and/or long-term investments.
The first step (optional, depending on the circumstances, as we will see) involves trying to acquire some idea about where we are in the cycle. For example, whether we should be moving towards defensive stocks, or – on the contrary – starting to be more aggressive, if we judge the declines to have been sufficient
Diversification is the clearest way to prepare the portfolio for any eventuality. Having at least 10 stocks gives us a reasonable amount of diversification. If we are managing on behalf of others it can be helpful to hold a few more, creating a portfolio of some 20–30 stocks. After that, there need to be strong arguments for increasing the number of stocks.
Pay particular attention to the weight of stocks in the portfolio. As already mentioned, over the years we got it wrong on a number of stocks, more than 40, but crucially they were seldom significant invest- ments. We must be very sure of our investment if we are going to assign it a high weight in our fund, never doing so if the company is indebted.
Changing weights. One of the ways to add value in asset management is by changing the size of positions in stocks
I don’t follow the markets until they close.
dealers or another team member will let me know if a particular stock has experienced a sharp movement or is closing in on a limit that interests us, so as to make the call on whether to buy or sell.
Some fund managers swear by the need to sleep on decisions. I agree. Giving yourself at least a day helps to fend off unnecessary haste.
APPENDIX I 26 Small Ideas and
One Guiding Principle
1. If you want to know about economics, learn German and study the Austrian masters.
2. We should only worry about the economic environment if we have a clear idea of how it might affect the market. Such clairvoyance might come to us once every five years, at most.
3. Own assets, don’t be a creditor. Loans are promises to pay which some- times are blowin’ in the wind.
4. Invest in what you know. The amount isn’t what matters, the crucial thing is knowing your limits, even if it’s your local housing market.
5. Nobody has to invest in anything. Often it’s best to do nothing.
6. If you don’t know what to do, invest in indexes. If you are completely
bewildered, invest in a cheap global index fund and be done with it.
7. Own shares, using any of the vehicles on offer.
8. If you invest directly in stocks, you need to spend time analysing the
competitive position of the company you want to invest in. The rest is
market noise, to be avoided at all costs.
9. It’s about studying companies, not the stock market. Buying a share
should be like buying the whole company. If we are not up for buying
the whole company, we’re not ready to buy a single share.
10. Businesses with a long track record have more chance of surviving than
new ones. Focusing on them will save us a lot of problems.
11. Make sure that the business is more or less capable of sustaining the same position over the next 10 years. If you’re not sure or think new technologies or new consumer trends could affect its market position,
better let it go.
12. If a company is creating value each year and improving its results, don’t
worry why the market hasn’t cottoned on to it. It’s another opportunity to keep investing at a good price.
272 26 SMALL IDEAS AND ONE GUIDING PRINCIPLE
13. The lower the price of a well-researched stock, the greater potential upside on the investment and the less risk involved. The reverse of economic theory is true: the higher the potential return, the lower the risk.
14. Acquaint yourself with the past, but be careful about extrapolating. Things change and future problems can emerge from the least expected places.
15. Speculators and volatility are dear friends: the more, the better our long-term results will be.
16. Lack of liquidity is also an ally. Other investors pay too much for liquidity.
17. Understanding what motivates others to act and how they do it, and our own rationale for what we do, is the essence of prudent and successful investment.
18. If we don’t have the right personality for investing, it’s better not to get involved. Alternatively, work on it. It’s not easy but, with the right guidance, it’s possible to improve our attitude towards investing.
19. It’s important to have firm beliefs (preferably the right ones!), but we must remain open to new ideas and ways of doing things. When we stop learning, we have one foot in the grave.
20. Investing in listed shares involves the greatest information asymmetry possible between buyer and seller. In the private market the seller knows how much the asset is worth (all homeowners know how much their house is worth). With listed shares, small investors spend too little time on analysis and institutional investors are subject to the restrictions of their institution.
21. Getting it right is not only about foreseeing what a company will do; more importantly, it’s about knowing how to distinguish between what the market thinks will happen and what will really happen.
22. Take the less trodden path. Buy what nobody else is buying. In the words of the Italian songwriter Fabrizio de André: be headstrong and go against the grain!
23. Enjoy the process. The journey is more interesting than the final destination.
24. Think. Don’t build models.
25. Read.
26. Cheer up. It’s much better to have been born in 2016 than in 1963.
Guiding Principle: Invest all the savings that you don’t need for the
immediate future in shares.