“The world is a book, and those who do not travel read only a page”. St Augustine
Either Pablo, Bethany or Juan David left this book in our home in Chía towards the end of 2017. After having a general overview, I thought that it was interesting to read it. I loved the way how in its first part the author tells stories about what were considered to be important adventures and then makes an analysis about common features of any adventure. It was excellent to see the descriptions of adventures on climbing the highest mountains in any continent or in the world (Everest), navigating to unknown places like the north or the South Pole, crossing Australia from the South to North, finding the origin of the Nile river, or following the route from Peru/Bolivia to the Tuamotu Islands in French Polynesia. In these descriptions, the book links the reader with some of the main documents available.
It was great to read the analysis of different competitions, which were valid during the 19 and 20th century, and how they succeeded or failed, depending on leadership, best equipments, plans, knowing (imagining) how to go there and how to come back and a thorough analysis on how to fight and overcome major risks (foreseen and unforeseen) that may happen because of weather, being lost, availability of food and water, animals that you can eat, while others could eat you, mosquitoes, languages, understanding local people, your own ego and the ego of other people, etc.
There was a strange feeling that in the book’s context, the Europeans or the Americans are the ones who “discover” the special points. It is a kind of history understood and written in a post-colonial context, with the riches people discovering key points in the world. It happens at the moment when there is no internet, no mobile phones or any of the modern tools available today. The case of Everest is interesting because it shows well the moment in which ascending the mountain becomes a good market for clients who can pay to get to the top. Be them old or new adventurers, it was impressive to read about the conditions that took some explorers to death.
When I go through my own experience, I can identify three “adventures” in which I might pass away.
- As a mechanical engineer, I was coming back from Araracuara (Colombian jungle in Caquetá-Amazons) to Villavicencio by plane and the pilot got lost in Northern Perú (1981)
- As social workers, we were helping survivors from the Armero disaster (November 13, 1985). We became part of a list of people who would be detained and possibly disappeared in Colombia because our jobs were observed by the army to have a subversive or revolutionary role.
- Representing an international organization I was visiting a group of teachers in El Salvador. They lived near San Salvador and they were working to support the FMLN’s development. Suddenly AF helicopters came and attacked the school where we had the meeting (1990).
There would be many elements to describe these three stories properly, but I will not do it in this text. What I found interesting was to reflect on them and see some of Conefrey’s elements of the three adventures: my role, the teams, plans, knowledge about the context, equipment, cooperation between teams, unforeseen events, the final outcome, internal and external publicity, how to share your own story... To an important degree, I was lucky because “Victory awaits him who has everything in order – luck people call it. Defeat is certain for him who has neglected to take the necessary precautions in time – this is called bad luck”, wrote Roald Amundsen.