As I read Willy Reese's A Stranger to Myself, I thought often that no one would ever want to make a war movie out of it despite the fact that Mr. Reese lived and what he writes about really happened. While there is war action, it's real war action, not the romanticized kind found in movies. For example, I was particularly struck by Reese's descriptions of how filthy dirty their clothes became and how long they lived in them that way. Or how they lived with their bodies infested with lice, or how sick they got but still had to march or fight or stand sentry duty. While he talks about the "freedom" of being a soldier, and being an "adventurer" in war, his descriptions have the claustrophobia of prison. And while both the foreword and the preface place the book in historical context, i.e. very few first hand accounts have come out of the Russian front of World War II on either side, I thought this book an extremely effective anti-war narrative.
Mr. Reese had talent for writing, and was clearly intelligent, maybe even an intellectual. He describes himself as more interested in books and music than in much of anything else. He was drafted in 1941 from his job in a bank, and although he's not wild about becoming a soldier, he reconciles himself to it as an experience, an adventure that he could write about. He's not at all a gung-ho soldier. He writes often how much he wants to be home, to be away from the fighting, and about the terror of facing "the enemy" which he comments are men like himself who are not his personal enemies. He describes his first winter in Russia, the near starvation, the cruelty and atrocities he and his comrades perpetrated on Russian civilians in order to survive, to get food to eat. He was 2o years old. Later in the book, he describes running from the fighting, running for cover, and he's not the only one. As I read this book, his almost matter-of-fact prose in which he uses the pronoun "we" all the time, reporting about all of them rather than about only himself, I had the distinct impression Reese chose that way of writing in order to give himself distance from what he saw, smelled and heard, from the experiences, because he was writing about them so close in time.
So, my one quibble about this narrative is that distance. It is based on Reese's diaries and notes -- he wrote the book using them as his resources -- and you can get a sense of those diaries in the end notes. This is one book that I highly recommend reading the end notes. They provide details about the German army's movements, the battles, and the geography that Reese doesn't provide, and they include a couple long diary entries as well as some notes that Reese wrote. They are in the first person and very close, immediate in emotion and reaction. I really would have like to read his diaries as companion to this narrative.
When I lived in Vienna, I heard stories about the looting, atrocities, and cruelties of the Red Army when it occupied that city after World War II. At the Russian Front, both the Germans and the Russians had orders to take no prisoners. Reese describes the resulting atrocities of those orders in this book. He describes the "sickness" he felt at carrying out those orders, and his sickness at seeing the madness all around him. He writes that war is madness. The ultimate madness is that this young man did not survive the war.
I highly recommend this book to readers of history, especially World War II, or German history. We are so used to reading about World War II from the perspective of the Allies, and this book is from the German perspective, although Reese was no Nazi.