First of all, this book is complete Riel slander. At the end of the introduction, Quan claims that Riel was defeated in the Red River Rebellion. Okay, I guess Manitoba exists because he lost, then. And in each of the stories each Chief is so clearly wise because he chose not to participate in the Northwest Rebellion. Well maybe if they had said yes, Riel might have actually won! It was a damn close one and if Crowfoot had decided to have the entire Blackfoot nation join, there might have been a victory. Ah, but it was oh so wise to know that the Rebellion was doomed from the start.
Second, this book upholds the Native Chiefs as some sort of moral role models that we can look up to and then paints them as horrible people. Did you know that Big Bear was very generous? And what evidence do we have? Well, when he would steal horses from others, he would give many of them away to his friends. Not so generous to the people he stole the horses from, now is he!? And Crowfoot, known as the peacemaker because of his ability to keep peace between the Cree and the Blackfoot people. And look just how peaceful he was, we're told. He didn't like to go on raids. Well, he let his son go on raids but he stayed out of it. Well, then there was that one time that his son was killed while raiding and Blackfoot went on a raid and killed a few people to avenge his son. Truly, what a peacemaker he must be!
I realize that there are probably cultural nuances that I don't understand. I am sure that there is a way to view Big Bear as generous and Crowfoot as a peacemaker but there is no attempt at all to explain that I, a white man, don't understand the subtleties of the way things were in that particular place at that particular time for those particular people. I mean, they sell these things in gift shops so ignorant white folk like myself are prime target, I feel like 'Amazing Stories' doesn't just get to assume I have a certain amount of cultural literacy about Indigenous affairs in the nineteenth century.