Ruskin Bond ended up disappointing me which was a surprise in itself. Of the six novels that this Classic Edition comprises not one presented itself as anything unique.
Bond, it seems, has a kind of template setting for all his stories with only few details that defer here and there. All his stories have the same mix - a small town somewhere in the hills of North India, a protagonist who is usually a writer and wanderer, a friend who has seen bitter circumstances and ends up selling trinkets off a tray, going on an adventure to some other part of the hills with said friend or a boy the protagonist just happened to meet, a train, a Peepul tree, stories about jinns and ghosts, a prostitute who is charming, a few other people like your friendly grocer/barber/dhobi/beggar. It's the same theme but with different names and addressed in different persons (either first or third). I can almost imagine 'Delhi is not Far' to be the third instalment of a trilogy following 'Room on the Roof' and 'Vagrants in the Valley' even though it's (supposedly) different. What shocked me the most was to read an exact same passage involving the village mute person following the protagonist and his friend in both Delhi (Chapter 8) and Vagrants (Chapter 3). The only difference in the excerpts was the names of the people (barring that of the mute man who is called Goonga -which is literally the word for 'mute' in Hindi - in both the stories) and the point of view the text was written in. I have to say I do not expect it of any author worth their salt to copy their own text almost verbatim from one novel to the next and quite pointlessly too, as it had no bearing on the rest of the story in the case of Delhi.
'A Flight of Pigeons' had a promising storyline but failed to excite me for the duration of it. After the exciting beginning with reference to the 1857 Sepoy Mutiny, its subsequent effects on the people around were almost mundane, especially since the narrator, a young girl, hardly brings any emotion or excitement into her narration but rather seems to be giving a chronicle of her life for the one year, where almost nothing happens except in the very beginning and the very end.
When I started reading 'The Sensualist' and the narrator comes across the man in the cave who offers to tell his story, I frankly felt that if I was the narrator I would have rather walked off into the forest than listen to the egotistical ramblings of the man's sexual conquests. The only redeeming quality of the story is that in the end the narrator finds the man in the cave to be a shallow, coward of a person and goes on his way. But that doesn't take away the fact that you've wasted time plodding through the rest of the man's story before the narrator comes to this splendid conclusion. Like I said, if I was him I'd have left the cave sooner.
I had thankfully read 'Handful of Nuts' long back and hence I was able to have a better opinion of it then, if I had read it as part of this series, I'd surely have grown irritated at yet another pointless story of a life in the hills with good-natured friends.
In Bond's defence, he is not a bad writer. When I first read his books I found it quite interesting and the simplicity was refreshing. In retrospect, those books also followed similar plots and characters but at the time it was a good read. Reading his works in succession makes the same simplicity seem tedious. He also seems to draw inspiration from one thing - life in the hills with good-natured friends, good-natured locals, good-natured bad guys and a good-natured but promiscuous girl or a prostitute or two. Yes, I'm aware of the repetition of the word 'good-natured' but if you read his books you will know what I'm getting at. Everybody is just too darn nice apart from having a few character flaws which can be easily overlooked. I honestly found his Children's Omnibus better and think he should have stuck to writing stories for children, even though his novels have some adult content it is written in a childishly simple way without even being too explicit about said adult matter.
I think partly the fault lies with the publisher for putting his novels together under one title and partly with me for reading them one after the other in succession.
My recommendations are as follows:
- Read Bond's book by keeping a considerable gap of a good few months between each book. Years would be even more helpful
- Read it when you want to read something light and simple
- Make sure its predecessors are not too rich, complex and/or mentally stimulating in content because this will definitely pale in comparison