This is a book written in 1817 of a first person account of a shipwreck and subsequent enslavement of an American merchant crew in what is modern day Western Sahara. The tale is told by the Captain - James Riley. The fact that he lived to tell the tale meant that he and part of his crew reached freedom via the time-honored path of ransom.
But you know all this already.
Is the book a good read?
Before answering, I should point out that the book apparently sold 1 million copies through multiple edition between 1817 and 1859. This is outstanding - especially as the book is not well-known today.
The first few chapters were interesting, especially the shipwreck, their attempts to escape in a leaky ship's boat, and their ultimately surrendering out of hunger, sunstroke, and thirst to the locals, who promptly enslaved them. You get a good feel for the times, the clash of cultures, as well as dealing with extreme hardship. Since we can picture the bleak coastline of Western Sahara, we can appreciate the crew's ordeal.
The book remains interesting as we learn how they survived on long treks across the desert, sometimes only with camel urine for sustenance.
Once sold to Sidi Hamet, who agreed to keep them alive in exchange for a promised ransom in faraway Mogador (in the Kingdom of Morocco), the book bogs down into day-after-day tramps through the desert with little to eat or drink and frequent run-ins with 'bad guys'. This gets repetitive and the middle to near the end of the book become tedious, mirroring the real journey.
Riley never once uses the voices or thoughts of his shipmates who were part of the group. He cares for them, wanting to keep them alive - but they are ciphers throughout the book - always near death, falling off camels, bewailing their fate, etc.
Riley also seems to have photographic memory of the long, more-than-one year, journey - this makes the account sometimes hard to believe in spots - but the overall story rings true.
Summary
a) Is it exciting? No (except to a 19th century audience). You know the ending and since his compatriots are featureless, you don't care about them as people and hence are uninterested whether they make it out alive or not.
b) Does it provide an interesting anthropological description of the peoples who lived in that area. Sort of, the only problem is that Riley saves most of his observations for a final chapter, long after his ransom. Had these been blended in during the story, it would have broken up for the reader the endless camel rides up and down dunes and mountains.
c) Is it hard to read because of stilted 1815 prose? Absolutely not. I was surprised at how readable this was and how close to modern English. There is no flowery language. And Riley does not overly place his deliverance as a godly miracle - although he certainly felt that way.
So read it as a first person account of an adventure and to gain insight into what Americans of 1817-1859 found as a best-seller.