To me, it seems that Michael Jecks’ portrayals of the medieval period is significantly darker than those of Ellis Peters. To be sure, Peters’ Brother Cadfael encounters disease and lack of sanitation, but Jecks’ Sir Baldwin de Furnshill makes one smell it and step in it. Peters’ Cadfael offers a more cerebral image of a more violent and repressive era while Jecks’ Sir Baldwin viscerally shoves the gore and atrocities in the reader’s face. That being said, both series of medieval mysteries have their place and I enjoy reading from both, depending on my moods.
The Butcher of St. Peters doesn’t refer to the expected victim of murder [It is, after all, a murder mystery.] but rather to a major suspect in said murder (or murders). And, while Jecks pleads historical grounds for the kinds of abuses (both political and ecclesiastical) described in the book, it is rather a cautionary tale on morality, despite delineating an unexpectedly cavalier attitude toward certain sins than one might expect. And, since The Butcher of St. Peters describes motives for a myriad of suspects from cathedral and cassocks to brothels and bailiffs, it does a good job of preparing the reader for the final resolution. Not that the final resolution will be satisfying to those looking for a “happy” ending, but within the limits of authentic justice within feudal society, the resolution does provide a “just” ending. Of course, there is a happy ending for some folks, just less than one normally expects.
The Butcher of St. Peters takes place within Jecks’ fictional chronology well after the last novel I read [admittedly out-of-sequence], Belladonna at Belstone. The latter gave an interesting perspective on life within a convent while the former builds on a historical rivalry/conflict between the wandering priors and priories and clerics and cathedral. This rivalry was fascinating to me as I was unaware as this dispute over burial rites.
This novel also seems to deal better with the psychological aspects of crime, greed, jealousy, revenge, and violence. There is a sibling rivalry in The Butcher of St. Peters that is as unsettling as it is vivid. It is unsettling because it features the kind of broken relationship that has happened again and again throughout history. It is also unsettling in its depiction of people who are pulled further and further into the whirlpool of self-destructive behavior and the casual display of misogynistic behavior by husbands treating their wives as property.
The Butcher of St. Peters offered me more thought-provoking appetizers than the average historical mystery.