Most of Joel Goldman’s “No Way Out” was tightly written. I was impressed by the way he continued to have Jack Davis repeatedly sift through the clues and summarize the possibilities. With two cases going on at the same time, this would appear to require concentration from both Jack and the author. There were a few stumbles that bothered me, though. A quick rundown, without spoilers:
As previously stated, the writing was excellent. Conversations between characters were natural, and the tough detective theme wove throughout the entire novel. Mr. Goldman planted clues for us to see, and Jack would put them together at various times and lead us down the different avenues of potential outcomes. Most impressive was the use of micro-expressions in the story, described accurately and not as a trick or a tool that worked all the time (especially without a baseline). Definitely a five star effort in this area.
The plot was entertaining, and the novel was hard to set down. The author continually presented plausible clues, only to have Jack and company destroy the theories and set off in another direction. The one blip (which possibly could have been a major issue) concerned the gun used by Roni when she shot her client (this happens on page 22, so not really a spoiler). I found it difficult to believe the gun would have been returned to her as quickly as described, and when its importance was emphasized later in the book, the author lost some credibility points with me. There were certainly other options how this could have been handled (I hesitate to explain more because I don’t want to move into spoiler mode). However, this was the only problem I had with the entire story, so not a reason to recommend to anyone to not read this book.
Characterizations were excellent, and told in an entertaining manner. Like most detectives in current novels, Jack has a disability he must deal with. This tiresome plot device is used effectively in “No Way Out,” or at least blended into Jack’s personality with enough skill that it did not turn into a detrimental element.
The ending came together neatly, and all the unraveled strings were brought together and made whole. While I thought the ending was slightly convenient, overall I was happy with the book and would recommend it to anyone who likes this genre.
One huge negative was the horrible editing. I am assuming this only happened if read on a Kindle. Indentations for no reason, paragraphs chopped up and extended down the page, and shorter paragraphs jammed all together into one. If not for the high quality of the author’s writing, I would have stopped reading. It is possible to get through the book, though the editing issue is distracting. I didn’t remove any stars for the editing, keeping the star rating based on the author’s work.