Raising children (biological/adoptive/foster...) is one of the most radical experiences in a lifetime: there is nothing else that binds you more to life itself, and the bond is forever (as long as you live); the bond is even stronger and more permanent than the 'ordinary' love bond between man and woman (or man and man, or woman and woman, etc.). Now the great paradox is that this intense bond with life is also a preparation ... for death! Let me explain. During the upbringing process, the bond between parent and child at first is very intense, but gradually it becomes looser: as a baby and a small child, their lives almost completely coincide with yours as a parent, you live everything, both the lusts and the burdens in an intense interaction that is usually one of the most wonderful, fulfilling, and absorbing experiences you can have as a human being; but gradually the child tears away from you, looks at the world in his/her own way, makes his/her own life. And let it be clear: this is normal and even healthy.
But as a parent this process is difficult: it is a constant struggle with guiding (taking care and setting limits) and letting go (giving trust); the letting go is an inherent part of the upbringing process, but it’s awfully heavy to bear, because the very thing that binds you most to life goes its own way; it is as if a piece of yourself (both physically and mentally) tears off, like a planet or a moon that cuts the gravitational link and goes its own way through the solar system (and of course, occasionally flashes by again). Pay attention, here it comes: this difficult process of letting go of your children is actually an early exercise in letting go of your own life, and thus into making peace with death, accepting your own finiteness as an integral part of life... Yes, you may swallow.
I apologize for the somewhat morbid tenor of my introduction. I may have put things a bit harsher than reality, but - as you might have guessed - it goes back to my personal experience of parenthood: together with my wife I raised 4 children and letting go for me was absolutely one of the hardest experiences of my life (but let there be no misunderstanding: the bond between us and our children is still very good, and we are very proud of the course that our children go). But for me personally, I have been able to accept that letting go-process by connecting it with the perspective of my own finiteness: embracing life ànd death, accepting the limitations of life, acknowledging that it can end and that you will have to let it go (and the world will go on). I must concede that it still is difficult, this coping, but my children unconsciously have teached me to accept this form of mental peace (not that I am so fixated on the end now, I hope I still have a long way to go).
But then there is this book, 'Tonio' by the Dutch author A.F.Th. Van der Heijden (in the Netherlands he is commonly known as A.F.Th). This is not about the own finiteness of the parent, but about the finiteness of the child and the fragile bond between child and parent. I guess there is nothing as hard as losing your child in the midst of his/her young life, even before he/she has been able to develop and realize all his/her talents and dreams. This is what happened to Van der Heijden and his wife Mirjam, with their 21-year-old son Tonio, who died in a stupid accident on his bike. This bulky book is a description of the various stages of the mourning process that A.F.Th. and Mirjam went through, starting from the report of the accident until they had enough courage, three months later, to visit the site of the accident and even view the CCTV-camera footage of what really happened. Reading all this of course is heartbreaking, you can almost physically feel their own pain, and the whirlwind of rational and irrational feelings they went through: panic, grief, despair, anger, guilt and even shame.
But the novel offers more, as the subtitle itself indicates: it is a requiem novel, a tribute to a life that was broken in the bud. What I particularly noticed (in the light of the theory I outlined above) is that the author also regularly focuses on the process of letting go. Constantly A.F.Th. looks back on his interaction with Tonio, as a baby, a toddler, a teenager and an early adult, with everything that accompanies this upbringing process: the care, the love, the protection and anxiety, but also the challenge, some friction, and the whole process of tearing apart, that also for A.F.Th. clearly was a difficult one. In his case, after the accident, letting go became very definitive, and let there be no misunderstanding: that is an issue of another dimension, a real drama. Death has gotten a face, that stays permanently in your mind, and you have to learn to cope with that. "Times heals all wounds", they say, but that is only partly true, Van der Heijden clearly shows you have to integrate the wound, the pain and the mourning in your life, so that is stays a part of you, forever. In a beautiful passage towards the end of the book, Van der Heijden expresses it in a unique way to his wife: "let mourning take its course, let the pain continue, because as long as there is pain, Tonio lives on, he still lives in us, he is not completely gone". For an outsider that could seem like a form of masochism, but anyone who has ever experienced mourning, knows how real and valuable this way of looking at pain and suffering is.
You can be shocked by the embarrassing introspection that A.F.Th. offers on his grieving process, with its great and small aspects, including the addiction to alcohol and painkillers. I can understand that. I must say, this form of narcissism and the enlargement of the ignoble aspects of his own life were elements that I didn’t appreciate in his earlier books. But here it seems just the right thing to do: showing life as it is, in all its small miserableness, in the midst of the worst possible crisis.
Finally, two aspects that also make up the greatness of this novel. In the first place the endearing way in which the close bond between A.F.Th. and his wife Mirjam is described. Their co-meandering through what certainly was the most difficult period of their lives, their unrelenting support to each other (even though they were not on the same mourning rhythm) is nothing short of moving, because it also is not so evident: a lot of relations break under this harsh experience. And then there’s also the literary quality of the book: the gargantuan style of Van der Heijden's previous novels wasn't my thing, and perhaps also this book could have done with 150-200 pages less, but the literary level of most passages is so high that this does not matter. On the contrary: mourning has an aspect of timelessness that calls for the rawness of it to be spread over as many pages as possible. It is a matter of respect to accept that, in homage to a life that was prematurely broken off, and in homage to the grieving of those that stayed behind.
(rating 3.5 stars)