“The first time the Deity came down to earth, he brought life and death; when he came the second time, he brought hell.”
Mark Twain’s Letters from the Earth, which were written under the influence of various blows fate dealt him, like the deaths of his 24-year old daughter Suzy from spinal meningitis in 1896 and of his wife Olivia in1904, never saw publication during their author’s lifetime, probably because they were considered as heavy stuff even with regard to what could be expected of a satirist like Mark Twain.
They are a collection of letters written by the Archangel Satan, who is once again banished from the presence of the Almighty due to certain irreverent remarks on Creation and who, this time, ended up on the planet Earth. To while away his time and to amuse the other Archangels, Satan writes them a series of letters in which he comments on Man as such and on the Christian religion in particular. Satan’s first letter is comparatively harmless and amusing enough since it deals with the Afterlife as it is pictured by Christians, and here Satan states that in Afterlife Man seems to engage in all sorts of activities he shuns or grudgingly consents to during his time on Earth whereas he will abstain in his Heaven from whatever form of pleasure he has known here in this world, such as sexual intercourse.
The following letters, however, become more and more iconoclastic and bitter when the author uses the Bible and the tenets of religion in order to reduce the idea of a loving and caring God to absurdity. Partly, the letters employ a simplistic materialism, e.g. when pointing out the absurdities of the story of Noah and the Ark, but they go deeper than that, e.g. when the question of illness and disease is raised:
”The human being is a machine. An automatic machine. It is composed of thousands of complex and delicate mechanisms, which perform their functions harmoniously and perfectly, in accordance with laws devised for their governance, and over which the man himself has no authority, no mastership, no control. For each one of these thousands of mechanisms the Creator has planned an enemy, whose office is to harass it, pester it, persecute it, damage it, afflict it with pains, and miseries, and ultimate destruction. Not one has been overlooked.
From cradle to grave these enemies are always at work; they know no rest, night or day. They are an army: an organized army; a besieging army; an assaulting army; an army that is alert, watchful, eager, merciless; an army that never relents, never grants a truce.
It moves by squad, by company, by battalion, by regiment, by brigade, by division, by army corps; upon occasion it masses its parts and moves upon mankind with its whole strength. It is the Creator's Grand Army, and he is the Commander-in-Chief. Along its battlefront its grisly banners wave their legends in the face of the sun: Disaster, Disease, and the rest.
Disease! That is the main force, the diligent force, the devastating force! It attacks the infant the moment it is born; it furnishes it one malady after another: croup, measles, mumps, bowel troubles, teething pains, scarlet fever, and other childhood specialties. It chases the child into youth and furnishes it some specialties for that time of life. It chases the youth into maturity, maturity into age, age into the grave.
With these facts before you will you now try to guess man's chiefest pet name for this ferocious Commander-in-Chief? I will save you the trouble – but you must not laugh. It is Our Father in Heaven!“
It is not too difficult to detect the author’s chagrin at the loss of his daughter Suzy through an insidious and senseless disease behind these lines, and yet the deeper question of why a Deity allows His creation to suffer cannot be dismissed. Not even the usual counter-argument of pointing out Man’s liberty of action works here since diseases are usually not brought about by human actions but they simply happen.
The letters also deal with certain gory passages from the Old Testament, as, for instance, God’s cruel and inhumane treatment of the Midianites – which is probably due to the fact that when the Israelites developed monotheism, it was their god of war that by and by replaced all their other deities – but they also criticize the conception of God in the New Testament by pointing out that Jesus not only brought redemption and forgiveness but also the notion of Hell, which is true – just remember Jesus’s frequent announcement of “wailing and gnashing of teeth” for those who do not believe in him and follow his teachings. In a way, this is really hard in that believing in something is not an act of volition; what if I would like to believe but simply can’t? In this context, however, we ought not to forget that the New Testament was not divinely inspired the way the Qur’an claims to be but that it was written by human beings who had their failings and their interests – just consider the beginning of the Gospel according to Luke:
”Since many have undertaken to set down an orderly account of the events that have been fulfilled among us, just as they were handed on to us by those who from the beginning were eyewitnesses and servants of the word, I too decided, after investigating everything carefully from the very first, to write an orderly account for you, most excellent Theophilus, so that you may know the truth concerning the things about which you have been instructed.”
Theophilus was probably a Roman senator or something similar, and Luke seems to have felt it necessary – doubtless with a view to converting this important person – to write down the life, death and resurrection of Jesus after examining the data available to him. Maybe this explains why Jesus in the Gospels threatens unbelievers with the prospect of Hell over and over again. In the Letters from the Earth, however, a more cynical explanation is given for the invention of Hell:
”Life was not a valuable gift, but death was. Life was a fever-dream made up of joys embittered by sorrows, pleasure poisoned by pain, a dream that was a nightmare-confusion of spasmodic and fleeting delights, ecstasies, exultations, happinesses, interspersed with long-drawn miseries, griefs, perils, horrors, disappointments, defeats, humiliations, and despairs – the heaviest curse devisable by divine ingenuity; but death was sweet, death was gentle, death was kind; death healed the bruised spirit and the broken heart, and gave them rest and forgetfulness; death was man's best friend; when man could endure life no longer, death came and set him free.
In time, the Deity perceived that death was a mistake; a mistake, in that it was insufficient; insufficient, for the reason that while it was an admirable agent for the inflicting of misery upon the survivor, it allowed the dead person himself to escape from all further persecution in the blessed refuge of the grave. This was not satisfactory. A way must be conceived to pursue the dead beyond the tomb.”
One might ask oneself the question: Who but the clergy would have any advantage from the notion of Hell?
As one can see, the Letters from the Earth is quite a serious criticism of (Christian) religion, not only of contemporary Christians’ morals but also of their beliefs but its deeper criticism only works if you fail to consider the historicity of the Bible, i.e. that it is, like all other religious tradition, not a word-by-word inspiration coming from the Deity Himself but a man-made interpretation of man-held values and tenets. Some of the basic assumptions made by the author need not even be shared, as, for example, the Letter’s notion that Man, being a divine creation, is not directly responsible for the way he acts since his nature was preordained by God. For all their shortcomings, though, the Letters offer a lot of food for thought, as here:
”We know what the offense was, without looking; that is to say, we know it was a trifle; some small thing that no one but a god would attach any importance to.”
Now that bit has not lost one tittle of topicality for are there not still enough fervent believers in all sorts of religions running through life and claiming that God, the highest Being imaginable, can seriously be vexed by a book, a caricature, a sentence or anything else deriving from puny Man? Hmph.