I was very disappointed in this book. I've been looking for an accessible book to give to undergrads that will discuss how to do read alouds better, and I thought it would be great if the book also could discuss the WHY of read alouds as well. I loved that this book discussed the importance of read alouds, and even the importance of continuing read alouds after a child is old enough to read to herself (or even for kids as old as high schoolers).
However, here are my biggest problems with this book:
1. The research he cites is severely flawed/occasionally inaccurate/often dated: Frequently I would track down his works cited/reading lists to find incorrect authors, titles, or publication dates. This raised the first eyebrow. I then noticed that often they way he presented information (even if the source he was using didn't do so) was in a flat way that often turned the blame for illiteracy, reading gaps, and failure (whether at school or at life) to the areas that were really problematic, such as implicitly perpetuating racist, classist assumptions regarding literacy and success. While part of this might have just been outside of his scope or capability, it concerned me as someone who knows how often research can be misrepresented so as to blame the victims of systemic inequality in the U.S. (and elsewhere), and I REALLY didn't want parents' or students' already racist/classist ideas to be bolstered through his support (all I could think of was having an already prejudiced person reading this book and going, "See, there's the proof that 'they're' not as good as 'us!"), or even having a person of the marginalized group being discussed reading it and internalizing the statements. Lastly, I'm most greatly concerned at the way this book presents its research as "well done" and credible/representative....but includes research that has since been widely discussed as incredibly flawed and problematic. The biggest example is his discussion of the great importance of Hart and Risley's research on the 30 Million Word Gap as being fundamental and how it should be read by every parent. While many parents (and even some teachers/schools of education) still promote Hart and Risley, many other great scholars have discussed how flawed this research was and how it doesn't take into consideration the lived experiences or intersectional problems facing families of various lived experiences (and often borderline falls to the victim blaming that I mention feels consistent throughout Trelease's book).
2. From the beginning he argues the way to improve literacy is INFORMATION, SHAME, AND FEAR: He references the anti-smoking campaign as his greatest model for a move to increase literacy in the U.S....and then goes on quite consistently to condescend to the readers who most need his book to learn about literacy approaches in the home and/or demonize anyone who doesn't put read aloud time to their children first (again, from a very classist perspective).
3. It reads like an inflated infomercial for itself: I lost count of the number of times Trelease explicitly positioned "reading aloud to your child will get them into an Ivy league school and lead them to be an impeccably moral person with a 6 figure respectable salary." (Ok, he didn't word it like that, but really he didn't put it quite far off from this.) And, as particular positive reinforcement for his book, he frequently told stories about how readers of the book's earlier editions started reading aloud to their kids (just because of his book) and now they have a deep, long-lasting relationship with their highly educated, wealthy, successful children. In the words of scientists who critique fad diet books, Trelease puts read alouds in the hyperbolic and overly-simplistic manner of a "snake oil salesman to cure all your ails."
4. The non-inclusive and less-than-impressive list of books to read aloud to your kids: This part is a bit nitpicky of me (but I feel like I can reserve this right as a children's literature higher education scholar), but I was really underwhelmed with the books he suggested to be read to kids. Granted, this is always the flaw of physically published lists of books. They will inevitably become outdated, most likely by the time the book list gets published. Yet even with this concession, I didn't consider his books to be very good examples even on this dated scale, and if you're looking for diverse representations within his book list you'll be hardpressed to find them.
5. Despite his seeming attempt to degender reading/read alouds, he actually further supports the feminized role of reading: The BIGGEST eye roll moment for me was when I realized he assumed that ONLY women (particularly heterosexual women in a traditional nuclear family) were reading this book. One section is even written "How to Get Your Husband to Read to Your Kids." I would love to explain all the problems with this....but I'd need another day (and way more characters than Goodreads would allow in this box). Just...no.
Overall, if you're a parent, here are the take aways (without the failed/skewed research he presents):
1. You should read to your kids, if you have the ability/resources.
2. If you can't read to your kids, audiobooks or wordless picturebooks are a great supplement, but not a good enough replacement for also spending time with your kids.
3. Exposure to language and positive experiences with books and reading (like ANY activity) will nurture that experience in your kids which will positively affect their relationship to reading and, subsequently, school.
But if you're looking for respectable research on WHY it's good to read to your kids, or if you don't know how to do a good read aloud or resources to turn to for book choices, this book won't help you. PLEASE if you are not a white/middle-upperclass/privileged parent in a traditional/nuclear family, please take everything he says with a grain of salt. Or just read the above 3 bullets I wrote. Or just google other resources. Or talk to a librarian. Or MESSAGE ME! But don't allow his book to make you feel the fear/shame he explicitly states is his method of persuasion. Lastly, if you ARE a white/middle-upperclass/privileged parent in a traditional/nuclear family, please don't read his book and allow it to bolster some ideas of how you're better than other parents because you do the things he does. Not everyone has the ability to do what he says should be done. Please recognize the privilege you are granted with if you can (something Trelease doesn't do a very good job of acknowledging).