Ok, so this was bad. After about a third of the way through I started skimming just to find out what happened, but eventually, I didn't even enjoy skimming.
It's just that everyone in this book was an idiot. Like, absolutely stupid, not smart, doesn't know how to talk to people or behave in public even. Was this supposed to be a satire maybe?
So to start off, Rachel is a Hollywood celebrity stylist who finds her biggest client in bed with her boyfriend and decides to get her revenge by putting the client in a bad outfit (horrendous) and sending her to a big event with media to humiliate her. The client then fires her and also takes away her phones, car and apartment because they were all gifts from the client.
And here's the stupid part - Rachel is surprised at how angry her client is! So apparently Rachel is a 30 year old woman who's been in this business for years, who somehow didn't realize that humiliating her biggest client was going to get her fired and then blackballed in Hollywood? When she first did it (before I realized that everyone in the book is an idiot) I thought of course she knew what she was doing and I was rooting for her to go out with a bang, thinking that this was a big, elaborate plan to fire her client. But then you find out that she thought this revenge would be no big deal and she would keep the client. Really? She was presented to us as a savy and successful businesswoman who's been doing well for years and yet she didn't realize that what she did would have consequences?
She then leaves Hollywood to go to her hometown where she meets Reno, the male lead, and is rude to him for no reason. They then do . . . . something. It's implied they had sex. But also implied that it only *seems* that they had sex and really they did something else. The author drags this on for far too long to the point where it was not in the least bit interesting by the time you find out what they did (it wasn't sexual). It doesn't help that there's no chemistry between them either.
Reno was annoying. For most of the book he's perfect. He buys all the candy being sold by young girls for charity, he's so hot that all the women in town giggle when they see him, he never says no to helping someone. He was completely one dimensional for at least 3/4 of the story. There was a scene in the second half of the book where Rachel talks about how he feels a need to be wanted because of some issues he has and that was actually interesting for a moment. I stopped skimming and actually read that scene! But scenes like that were pretty rare in this book.
And the side romance was just awkwardly weird. Nate is apparently really, really stupid in a way that's also sexually inappropriate, though the author seemed to want us to go "awww" at all of his bad behaviors. Like when he grabbed Angela's ass (!) to show her what to avoid when she went on a date with someone else (!!!) and then, a minute later, asks her for help in wooing Rachel who he swears is the love of his life or something.
So of course Angela and Nate end up together, but I don't understand *why* other than Angela is horny and Nate is hot? That's what it came down to as far as I can tell. We're told they both love each other, but it wasn't shown at all (platonic love, sure, but romantic love came out of nowhere). But honestly, they had more chemistry than Rachel and Reno at least.
Throw in a lot of Hollywood Girl Is Ashamed Of Small Town Life Because She Forgot Her Roots, followed by the required realization that Small Town Life is Better And More Real Than Hollywood, and you have this book in a nutshell.
It was also odd that Rachel grew up in Kismet, but was constantly amazed at how things were done in Kismet. It was like the author forgot the backstory and was confused about where the character was from?
I don't know, maybe this *was* supposed to be a satire and I just didn't get it.