Here's an aphorism that needs to be debunked: Being a frequent reader does not make you a better person; all that this book proves is that being a frequent reader makes you more well-read. You will still suffer the same dysfunctions the non-reading public suffers, but maybe you can quote Dorothy Parker every once in a while for solace.
I'm on the bus with the need to read with and to your kids, and a lesson in endurance and loyalty to the cause goes down nice and easy. But author Ozma spent so much time making excuses for her father's ice-cold demeanor and her mother's abandonment and selfishness, I never felt comfortable both with her family's strange dynamics or the comfort that a bedtime story should invite, but never did here. Her father never TOUCHES her, aside from their nightly reading. I mean, no hug, no kiss, not even shaking hands. Of course the child will be begging for a thousand-night streak of reading, if only it guarantees a little warmth and acknowledgement from the one parent left in her house. Ice, I tell you.
And I love that Dad is a dedicated school librarian who painstakingly creates his book collections and strives to create a comfortable reading environment with furniture, art, light music, etc., (all an attempt to counter his isolating personality, I'm guessing), but when Ozma consistently reminds us how often he rehearses his readings, not just for his students, but his own daughter, it frightens me to see how afraid he is to be authentic with his own child. What about the shared excitement of speculating a plot? Why does Dad need to be such a control freak? Why can't he let his daughter know he sometimes makes mistakes, but the world doesn't end regardless? Even worse, he CENSORS bits of ya literature that make him uncomfortable, but are both essential to the plot and important for a young girl to consider, especially in this isolating household. Dad can't broach the subject of bras, even to the extent of using an author's words instead of his own? What a selfish ass...Worse, Ozma seems to think this is -- cute. Oh my silly dad. No, your dad is a wimp, a phony, and a hypocrite. Read, but read it my way.
I was really amazed that Ozma wrote a chapter pretty much advertising her father's singlehood. Any single women out there who hate to be touched, love to be relentlessly teased with sarcasm, and look forward to every major holiday spent with the ex? Write in!
This book is not what I expected, nor is it what the cover and blurbs convey. This is not about how particular books shaped a child's worldview. It's about an OCD dad who dumped his politically-correct and therefor good-father-approved obsession with books on his daughter in an attempt to connect, where all other normal father-daughter connections failed. Ozma matures into an empathetic, impassioned adult, but it still feels like she doesn't even understand the strange compulsions that govern her father, even though the only perspective we have on their relationship is her own writing. It ends well, or at least dramatically, with the threat of the end of reading and her father's strategy to fight it, and I'm behind that 100%, but I think it's important to realize that reading won't solve every problem or be the appropriate stand-in for an otherwise emotionally insufficient father-daughter relationship.
I hope that Ozma continues to write, and branches off into less personal territory, since it's her family that is perplexing, not her writing. There is a lovely chapter about the death of her alpha fish that reads well all on its own, and even her parents come off as somewhat engaged and empathetic. Ozma writes very persuasively from the vantage of precocious child interpreted through the matured older self. I think she could write a dynamite children's book, ala Beverly Cleary. Just please leave Dad out of it.