The subject manner seems interesting - tackle the crimes we've seen on TV from the prosecutor's perspective. Unfortunately, the book suffers from three major drawbacks:
(a) It has a very disjointed writing style. While I get that you would rather tackle the subjects "victim blaming", "trial profiteering", etc. as chapters, jumping back and forth between this high profile trial and that trial, makes it really hard to feel invested in any of the actual cases
(b) Her solutions are horrifying - admit polygraphs, track your children via GPS, etc. Now this may be just some clueless European speaking her, but America's fear for their children has taken on irrational behavior, because of a few high profile cases. Reading this book, you would think there is an epidemic of rapes, kidnappings and murder of children happening - it's not!
(c) Victim blaming is bad, I agree. But how about attacking the presumption of innocence. Attacking the defense team of the central park 5 in hindsight doesn't seem very smart. Attacking people making money out of high profile cases, when she worked for Court TV! Lastly, this is just personal, but I don't believe in the death penalty, so her continuous hailing it as the solution was sad. Never was redemption ever on the table for her.
I was ready to be swayed, but unfortunately Nancy Grace could not convince me with her objections! Dismissed! :/