Wow! This is quite a book. For being over 800 pages I can't say that it is really worth it. It's scholarly breadth is top notch. Schillebeeckx again brings his style and critical drive to the whole of the NT cannon in search for the meaning of the word "Christ".
This book is really two books. Within it is about a 400 page analysis of NT documents. The rest is Schillebeeckx's argument about who Christ is. It is an arduous undertaking to read, but it is also refreshing.
There is not much out there in contemporary theology which represents the neo-orthodox tradotion which was prominent around the turn of the 20th century. Shillebeeckx synthesizes all the various strands of thought and forms a critical and well thought out tradition for our modern times in encountering the Christ. Shillebeeckx's goal is simple: Who do we say Christ is? What do we make of him in our modern world?
To answer this Schillebeeckx examines the NT literature which shows how the writers adapted and re-interpreted the Christ in order to fit their circumstances and environment. But through these various strands there were elements which remained constant.
Then in a Tillichian style Schillebeeckx gives an existential basis for us to relate to Christ through the reconciliation of our alientation, failure, death, guilt, suffering, and meaninglessness. Schillebeeckx follows the pattern of modern theologians of changing the language of faith, but at the same time, I believe, he stays true to the heart of the Gospel.
However, it must be recognized that there are some fundamental doctrines which have to be reconsidered in order to accept Schillebeeckx line of thought. The first is Biblical inerrency. The Word of God is Jesus and the canon of the NT represents an experience the Church fathers had with the risen Lord. This experience can be described as revelation, and in order for us to take this revelation seriously a critical examination of the text becomes necessary. For Schillebeeckx the text of the Bible is authentic, but the authority of the Bible only comes through an interpretation, and thus necessitates an experience. There is no stand alone authority of the Bible. It rests on faith.
The next is Christian Particularism. Now as a Chritian Schillebeeckx remains faithful to the claim that salvation is only found in Jesus, but at the same time Schillebeeckx is moved by grace and the reality of the solidarity of man. Schillebeeckx is not committed to the idea of a definate distinction as to what "marks" a Chritian and non-Christian. Though it is never explicitly stated, Schillebeeckx seems to fall into line with a kind of soft universalism. But at the same time, Schillebeeckx remains committed to evangelism and sharing the Gospel. For Schillebeeckx there is almost no distinction between sharing the informational datum of how Jesus is Lord and at the same time bringing a person to a deeper awareness of brotherly love and community. Both are representatives of the same phenomenon and neither should be neglected for the sake of the other. In this vein, Schillebeeckx looks no further for a definition of what a "Christian" is other then a follower of Christ, and at the same time it was Christ's mission to reconcile the world to him.
In all, I do not think Schillebeeckx offers anything "new" theologically. Salvation still comes through faith, and it is still by grace, and it is still through the resurrection of Jesus Christ. There are dimensions of the Christian faith which Schillebeeckx challenges, like the ethical demands found in the NT, but he does not abandon. Schillebeeckx identifies with an import of ethical influence in the NT, unique to our experience in Christ, but this does not follow a fundamentalistic or literalistic trend. In all Schillebeeckx sees the Christian faith is a dialogue. There is an inherent tensions which exists and we must involve ourselves in the resolution. Being dogmatic and objectifying excludes us from this process, which Schillebeeckz sees as God's continuing saving activity among men.