When this book is doing these mourning, sad, craven inward adjustments, it really works. When it bloats into a big CanLit namedrop “here’s what real writing probably should sound like” moralizing endeavor, well then it gets a little harder to love. Maybe it’s just the annoyance at little jabs at theorists while simultaneously generating a mythic canadian vibe, anti-academy but otherwise uncritical; maybe this is the killdeer motif coming through as intended, or maybe it’s just the kind of anger poetry holds onto. Whatever it is that draws in a lot of obtuse telling muscles out the strengths of the book that lie in feeling, in remembering. Anyhow, toss in a mound of Irving Layton mentions and an opinion on Purdy falling flat once he’s dead and the award-world will love that you fall into the tradition by referencing it and you’ll get your GG. I hope to look up other work by Hall soon because I think he does have a felicity with the poe(m/ssay), and I assume some of his writing must be less alienating, less bitter; maybe that there’s a lot of bitterness and not much anger, maybe that’s what ejects me each time I come back. Maybe hype killed it. Either way, disappointing. Sometimes I agree with the obtrusive thoughts on what makes good writing, but that it seems to be the only anchor outside grief, and seems too to tug away from the grief’s potency, kills the energy. To spend so much time complaining about how “Each year Father bestows MAs for bad sequences on budding / novelists” while speaking in such a popular Canadian poetic voice, one that those MA students get taught to parrot (and I would say do so to great success) makes me wonder in what world PH thinks “authentic” writing comes from, because I am w(e)ary of all that M(F)A polished writing too, but I’m tired of the Atwoods and Ondaatjes and even the Purdys and the Nichols some days too. PH voice here implies that good writing and any hope of political liberation died off with a bunch of writers he was friends with when they lived, and it seems the strength of his craft outstrips the depth of his reflection in the collection; and immediately I want to say “that’s how grieving can be,” but it’s not the grieving moments that have that strange attitude. Anyhow, he already won the GG and me sitting here with brain damage writing a moderate goodreads review so I can remember what the hell I thought of the book in 6-months isn’t gonna take that away from him.
//
On Bronwen Wallace:
“I write poems so that if she were to knock again – I’ll have some”
//
“Our sometimes worthy impulse to shock & say the unadorned – / can become aligned – by form alone – with art that is too careful / / Too accurate – too simple – too ‘good’ – in a school-bookish way”
//
“I was there [in Crete] – writing on an old door propped between rocks / under a fig tree – because I admired those people who had fought / so intractably for their island back – in ways my own country never / would”